i designed this setup in 2019 [game over]

Elements · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:52 pm

My vote wasn't a response to the "town core" voting me

Frogsterking · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:53 pm

Yeah, let's make sure to townlock imaginify because it's really sus how in a 23 person game, a few UTRs moved their votes onto imaginify after imaginify made a series of scummy posts. Nice one.

Frogsterking · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:54 pm

In post 500, Elements wrote:My vote wasn't a response to the "town core" voting me

Talk about why you scum read imaginify then.

Elements · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:54 pm

In post 495, Frogsterking wrote:Dear lord, Gamma and Elements interaction looks forced too.

You think it's scum theatre?

Elements · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:55 pm

In post 501, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah, let's make sure to townlock imaginify because it's really sus how in a 23 person game, a few UTRs moved their votes onto imaginify after imaginify made a series of scummy posts. Nice one.

I don't understand what this is a response to

Elements · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:55 pm

In post 502, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 500, Elements wrote:My vote wasn't a response to the "town core" voting me
Talk about why you scum read imaginify then.

Vibes and tone

Elements · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:56 pm

I think it's quite possible imaginify isn't that invested in the game atm and that's why their posts read the way they do

Titus · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:57 pm

In post 502, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 500, Elements wrote:My vote wasn't a response to the "town core" voting me
Talk about why you scum read imaginify then.

Cry more.

Frogsterking · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:58 pm

In post 503, Elements wrote:
In post 495, Frogsterking wrote:Dear lord, Gamma and Elements interaction looks forced too.
You think it's scum theatre?

I'm not sure yet, it's definitely theater on Gamma's end, but it kinda looks like you and Gamma are trying to make the imaginify wagon seem like ass.

Frogsterking · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:58 pm

In post 506, Elements wrote:I think it's quite possible imaginify isn't that invested in the game atm and that's why their posts read the way they do

I don't.

Elements · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:59 pm

Interesting take

HighPrincessErinys · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 1:59 pm

In post 488, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 484, HighPrincessErinys wrote:Went back to this post and it's... interesting. Says "Haha, what if Ranger is scum? Anyways, I agree with her.", calls out a non-existent AtE on KT as 309 and 310 are unrelated to why he actually townreads Gamma, and calls Titus's scum pair reads scummy because...? He calls KT's reasons for townreading Gamma worth scumreading in the same post, has been pushing and scumreading Ythan, and again points out the possibility of a scum Ranger, which all together kinda gives this an OMGUS feel considering he's the last person in those reads. This one agrees Titus explaining her scumreads would be nice, but the scumreads themselves being scummy? Not so sure.
It would be helpful if Town (?) stops tinfoiling a scum motivation into isolated comments they find from my iso.

In post 489, Frogsterking wrote:I'm not sure what the scum motivation you're supposedly seeing is either. If you are suggesting I may secretly be trying to sabotage Ranger then by golly you must think I am an awful scum player.

\

Hey, nothing about scum motive or sabotaging Ranger. This one just wants to know what's up, especially with the Titus point here. What exactly about 379 is scummy to you?

Frogsterking · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:00 pm

In post 504, Elements wrote:
In post 501, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah, let's make sure to townlock imaginify because it's really sus how in a 23 person game, a few UTRs moved their votes onto imaginify after imaginify made a series of scummy posts. Nice one.
I don't understand what this is a response to

Oops I missed the quote:

In post 491, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 490, Elements wrote:
In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not gonna feel good about a wagon where people I suspect are frontloaded on it
Do you think imaginify is town?
At this point, yes. My initial reasoning to suspect them wasn’t ironclad, and the wagon on them happening so fast and in the way it did spooks me.

In post 501, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah, let's make sure to townlock imaginify because it's really sus how in a 23 person game, a few UTRs moved their votes onto imaginify after imaginify made a series of scummy posts. Nice one.

Elements · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:01 pm

That makes much more sense

Cat Scratch Fever · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:07 pm

In post 499, Titus wrote:I can see CSF scum.

What's up Titus?

Titus · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:11 pm

In post 514, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:
In post 499, Titus wrote:I can see CSF scum.
What's up Titus?

Wagon hops. No words.

Frogsterking · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:12 pm

In post 480, Elements wrote:VOTE: imaginify

In post 481, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 480, Elements wrote:VOTE: imaginify
I’d rather you vote me.

In post 482, Elements wrote:Why?

UNVOTE: Elements

The way Titus (502) and Gamma are engaging the thread right now kinda makes me think Gamma saw Elements vote and decided to capitalize on it. 481 is such an awkward statement and one that Elements is so likely to respond to that I think it makes more sense Gamma was baiting Elements with 481 to draw them into a damning interaction that will look bad after Gamma flips. The comment "oh gee look how fast the imaginify wagon is moving" right after Elements voted makes way more sense if Gamma and Elements aren't associated.

HighPrincessErinys · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 2:29 pm

Worth mentioning in relation to Gamma asking to be voted/limmed:

In post 146, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Gonna give y’all a little tip: you might not want to kill me.

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:I realized the exact reason why this push reeks of bullshit: it’s the same crock of shit Krazy used to pull against me. This sort of “scum!Gamma always reacts this way” comment is one I’m well-acquainted with, and one that imo ensures one of us is scum. So I think today’s vote absolutely SHOULD be between me and Frogsterking.
It’s still not wise to vote me out, unless you want a lot of deaths really fast.

McMenno · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:05 pm

In post 479, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 478, McMenno wrote:im townreading gamma now this is epic
McMenno moved to town lean for me based on pre flip associations with Gamma.

that's about the worst way to read people

Frogsterking · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:07 pm

In post 518, McMenno wrote:
In post 479, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 478, McMenno wrote:im townreading gamma now this is epic
McMenno moved to town lean for me based on pre flip associations with Gamma.
that's about the worst way to read people

You're wrong, it's one of the best, and you should improve at the game before you decide which methods you will apply and which you will reject.

McMenno · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:08 pm

well I'm loving the confidence at least

Frogsterking · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:11 pm

In post 520, McMenno wrote:well I'm loving the confidence at least

Thanks

Ythan · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:13 pm

In post 519, Frogsterking wrote:You're wrong, it's one of the best, and you should improve at the game before you decide which methods you will apply and which you will reject.

You're the same person who's been posting on that account all game yeah?

imaginality · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:15 pm

(Only read up to page 18)

My point isn't "They're voting me so they're scummy" which would be lazy and omgussy. It's "with my slow posting and name confusion and umimpressive entry into this game I've given superficially good reasons for people to vote me, that's a wagon scum love to jump on because it means they don't have to bullshit therefore it's more likely scum are on me compared to if the main argument against me was bullshit"

Frogsterking · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Sat Dec 24, 2022 3:21 pm

In post 517, HighPrincessErinys wrote:Worth mentioning in relation to Gamma asking to be voted/limmed:
In post 146, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Gonna give y’all a little tip: you might not want to kill me.

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:I realized the exact reason why this push reeks of bullshit: it’s the same crock of shit Krazy used to pull against me. This sort of “scum!Gamma always reacts this way” comment is one I’m well-acquainted with, and one that imo ensures one of us is scum. So I think today’s vote absolutely SHOULD be between me and Frogsterking.
It’s still not wise to vote me out, unless you want a lot of deaths really fast.

I really am not scared in the slightest and I think softing TPR is about the scummiest thing she could have done. The way she did it is an element of her scum game I have seen before which I will be going over in my meta case on Gamma. By the way, I will be referencing 6 completed games I have played with Gamma instead of 4 (402) because I decided it would be savvy to include counter-examples from my games with Town!Gamma of what I haven't seen from them here.

I think a better reason to not vote Gamma out today is that they are posting so much in the thread they will be a gold mine for associative tells come end game, so it's more efficient to try and hit a low-poster scum D1 and maybe D2.