144 is pro town and moves the game forward regardless of Dease' alignment.
148 and 138 give me scum pings (herta and furtive respectively.) Herta is a bad mix to me right now of both being really defensive (85) and evasive (148.)
In post 144, DeasVail wrote:Herta's looseness feels different from last game, where they felt more stilted. 23 feels particularly carefree, where scum might worry that they may garner suspicion for looking like a tractor.
My counter argument to the above is that herta can be savvy enough to mix up their approach if they got a scum PM twice in a row with the same players and setup.
The question from furtive in 138 looks like the kind of question scum might throw in to fake engagement. Furtive's comment about Dease signaling (116) looks a lot worse for furtive now that Dease posted 144.
__
VOTE: Bell
There is 0 depth behind my vote.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
In post 126, Frogsterking wrote:Hey can you do something besides whine about getting called out for your dog shit posts? Like, post anything that doesn't make me want to throw up in my mouth when I read it? What gave you the idea to "preliminary town read" MT based off a mech post?
In post 126, Frogsterking wrote:What gave you the idea to "preliminary town read" MT? Was it only based off their mech post?
EBWOP @ herta. I'm sorry I said your posts are dogshit, that was way too harsh and not accurate of what I actually think. I think your posts are consistently null or scummy and I'm struggling to come up with any reasons to rule you out as a suspect. I don't really believe your posts or play are of sub par quality and I'm sorry that I wrote what I did in #126.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
When i open this game, and starting read, i immediatly close it because i starting strongly consider self last townie alive and others are just jesters.
I feel like this is one of those games where I get run up for acting like a power role and then spam the thread until I convince people otherwise.
Can I skip it.
*ahem* I meant seeming like scum when I'm a power role.
People always get their wires crossed but I'm here for it.
I'm totally not a power role btw.
and I'm not useful.
I miss Lukewarm suddenly.
I suppose I can't be in all the games with him. Alas.
I also miss Dunnstral, but I have no idea why when he would have like, 1-2 posts max at this point.
I wonder if the lack of granades matters here or not.
Their posting's alright. For them. Herta's response is interesting but doesn't make a lot of sense, they might just be prickly.
I already entirely forgot what they were like last game.
In post 156, Bell wrote:*ahem* I meant seeming like scum when I'm a power role.
People always get their wires crossed but I'm here for it.
I'm totally not a power role btw.
and I'm not useful.
Though yes, please share your reasons. *pokes MT*
I wonder if this is the part where I go "oh yeah that makes sense, I've FoSed players who were power roles before" and then I start hard defending scum!Bell all day.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
In post 159, Bell wrote:I wonder if the lack of granades matters here or not.
Their posting's alright. For them. Herta's response is interesting but doesn't make a lot of sense, they might just be prickly.
I already entirely forgot what they were like last game.
Traitor. And yes, plays differently here. Not more interested in how their post would be perceived but less pushy for an elim.
OK, Meuh...probably town based on the answers to NH. I mean, as as scum, they'd have quite a few things to attack based on NH's very early townreads.
Now, Titus...so, the last setup, there was no role that had this sort of abilities. Knowing stuff other than the traitors thing. This setup is changed at least in some ways (whomever asked). Don't know how much, but yeah, not exactly the same roles. Still, don't think mafia- a role like this would be useless. Or the third party.
In post 165, Flavia wrote:Now, Titus...so, the last setup, there was no role that had this sort of abilities
There was a role like this last game. (which was town-aligned) viewtopic.php?p=13589333#p13589333
(Clerk)
To quote one of its powers:
“Information: You know additional information about the setup: At least one role provides a misleading result.”
In post 165, Flavia wrote:Now, Titus...so, the last setup, there was no role that had this sort of abilities
There was a role like this last game. (which was town-aligned) viewtopic.php?p=13589333#p13589333
(Clerk)
To quote one of its powers:
“Information: You know additional information about the setup: At least one role provides a misleading result.”
Yep, sounds like Bell probably got a red role pm. I thought he was really obvious town in the og setup.
I voted Bell, so why was my vote skipped? @mod
* * *
Anyway not wasting a post on that.
* * *
If Bell’s really a PR, I’d want to wait to hear more from him.
VOTE: Herta
Think I want to switch to this. Herta sounds really annoyed and I understand Deas’ reasoning for the tr but keep in mind, that we all have access to the og setup and can easily crosscheck if people are playing very differently, so unlike your usual meta read, this one is going to logically be a lot more accurate. So we know he was scum last time, well if I roled scum in two incarnations of the same setup, I think I’d be really pissed because you really can’t argue, different play, different game like you could with general meta reads, so I just can’t help thinking that Herta’s possibly upset because he rolled scum again? What gives me a little bit of pause is how he seems to almost be going out of his way to provoke Frogs and that might make me not want to vote there but calling Frogs’ post about apologizing for really over the top harshness, how is that suss? I sometimes do that. Whenever I get upset and think I’ve maybe over reacted to something, I’ll apologize too because I don’t want to seem unnecessarily mean or toxic to anyone and I know that Frogs has previously incurred mod spankings for that behaviour so he’s probably a lot more aware of how he’s coming accross.
In post 159, Bell wrote:I wonder if the lack of granades matters here or not.
Their posting's alright. For them. Herta's response is interesting but doesn't make a lot of sense, they might just be prickly.
I already entirely forgot what they were like last game.
Traitor. And yes, plays differently here. Not more interested in how their post would be perceived but less pushy for an elim.
OK, Meuh...probably town based on the answers to NH.
I mean, as as scum, they'd have quite a few things to attack based on NH's very early townreads.
Now, Titus...so, the last setup, there was no role that had this sort of abilities. Knowing stuff other than the traitors thing. This setup is changed at least in some ways (whomever asked). Don't know how much, but yeah, not exactly the same roles. Still, don't think mafia- a role like this would be useless. Or the third party.
Liking this post by Flavia. Sounds like that post - particular the bolded - is coming from a townie mindset because scum like to find really dumb reasons to sr someone and that would be beyond seriously dumb, because I think scum in general dislike having too many early positive reads.
I wrongly tr Deas last time but comparing his posting this game, I now realize that something was kind of off about him last time and he does vibe differently this time.
@Mod: Extension, Holiday season doesn't count.
@Mod: Prod people please I'm not Bah humbug enough to request it on christmas. But I sure am the day after.
