Community Redux | Postgame

N.Y. M · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:08 am

In post 298, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 295, N.Y. M wrote:What readslists? Bell has so far only made one read on Flavia.
That's sketch, Bell needs to post a read on every player. Same for herta.

The point is he has enough content on several players to give some reads and yeah I agree. Nothing in his ISO looks townie. Weird irrelevant fluff posts point to him being greater > rand scum and his hyper focussing on Flavia also looks very bad. Flavia based on last game alone, looks like an easy target to focus on. A lot of people wrongly thought she was scum last game and she doesn’t sound any different this game.

Frogsterking · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:10 am

VOTE: Bell

In post 299, N.Y. M wrote:
In post 297, Frogsterking wrote:Internet issues give me a break lol. Andres and ActionDan can get angleshot half a dozen ways here.
There’s nothing pointing against it. He hasn’t been onsite, I checked. There’s no evidence to suggest he’s avoiding the game. If Bell towns it up, I’ll reconsider but I think he’s very likely scum here.

~N

232?? 294?

Frogsterking · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:12 am

What do you mean "nothing on site"? There is a clear sign that andres doesn't have limited access.

Frogsterking · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:13 am

I don't think it matters anyway though because I'm down to hammer Bell and I think we're arguing over which scum to kill first.

Frogsterking · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:16 am

I think scum team is toast, with Meuh not far behind.

Bell

/andres/herta/ActionDan

N.Y. M · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:20 am

In post 303, Frogsterking wrote:What do you mean "nothing on site"? There is a clear sign that andres doesn't have limited access.

There is? Where? If he hasn’t been onsite how does that disprove that?

Meuh · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:22 am

Oh, I was confused by what Frog was saying cause I thought the mafia was 3 people, not 4.
I admire the confidence in that solve and I don't disagree with it enough to argue against it.

N.Y. M · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:30 am

In post 307, Meuh wrote:Oh, I was confused by what Frog was saying cause I thought the mafia was 3 people, not 4.
I admire the confidence in that solve and I don't disagree with it enough to argue against it.

[*]This is a Large Theme themed around a delegation of militants and a government official.
[*]The
Residents
are the uninformed majority and the
Delegation
is the informed minority.
[*]There is a
Government
official who is
Antisocial
. If they win, all other players will lose.

Frogsterking · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:31 am

In post 307, Meuh wrote:Oh, I was confused by what Frog was saying cause I thought the mafia was 3 people, not 4.
I admire the confidence in that solve and I don't disagree with it enough to argue against it.

Your scheme to pump me up and use me as a battering ram for your 3rd party win would be brilliant if I weren't already aware of your machinations

In post 306, N.Y. M wrote:
In post 303, Frogsterking wrote:What do you mean "nothing on site"? There is a clear sign that andres doesn't have limited access.
There is? Where? If he hasn’t been onsite how does that disprove that?

Come on Nancy Drew, find the clue!

Meuh · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:34 am

In post 308, N.Y. M wrote:
In post 307, Meuh wrote:Oh, I was confused by what Frog was saying cause I thought the mafia was 3 people, not 4.
I admire the confidence in that solve and I don't disagree with it enough to argue against it.

[*]This is a Large Theme themed around a delegation of militants and a government official.
[*]The
Residents
are the uninformed majority and the
Delegation
is the informed minority.
[*]There is a
Government
official who is
Antisocial
. If they win, all other players will lose.

I looked at the previous game’s setup. Thought it was 3/1/10, but it was 4/1/9. I’m assuming the ratios are the same this time around

DeasVail · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 9:45 am

I’m prepared to vote Bell if needed prior to deadline

furtiveglance · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 11:39 am

Before the day ends let me say this game feels like original community:

Everyone agreeing that someone is scum but I'm not sure (I was wrong last time)

Frogsterking naming the 3p out of nowhere (correct if wrong but didn't that happen last time)

PenguinPower · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 12:37 pm

Thanks for reminding me that frogster needs to eat his laundered socks.

Titus · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 2:17 pm

Reading up Sunday. If you ask, prepare for bitch.

PenguinPower · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 2:26 pm

uh...deadline is waaaaay before then

just vote bell

Meuh · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 2:48 pm

Yeah it'd be nice if everyone can just vote Bell
I think 10 or so hours left before night?

PenguinPower · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:04 pm

i have a strong feeling we're going to end up with a no elim at this point

Meuh · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:09 pm

I think we're at E-2 so a nolim would be really embarrassing...

DeasVail · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:16 pm

VOTE: Bell

Meuh · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:17 pm

OOoooooh who gets to hammer, who gets to hammer??

Herta · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:19 pm

VOTE: bell

I thought we were already there actually.

PenguinPower · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:21 pm

poor enchant

Meuh · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:22 pm

Robbed of the hammer

Herta · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:23 pm

Hey man don't make me feel bad for kneecapping enchant.