No. Your position is that I cannot be controlled and therefore should die. You're posting repeatedly about supposedly being no reason to townread me while simultaneously shooting down every reason you've been given. This isn't about facts. It never has been.In post 1645, MathBlade wrote:I am not “rah rah Titus is scum follow me or die”.
Mason claim when partner wagoned, people say Titus as scum wouldn't do it
You: *strawman* Titus would
Locking into a claim that requires me to die, scum don't usually do that
You (fairish): Titus had fun in the role
Titus has been giving reads and responding and trying to work with people
You: But scum have to be pushing a wagon
You want to talk about fishy claims, look at McMennos. You've ignored the claim because you think scum are pushing it because it was a collective compromise so someone has to be scum on it. You aren't engaging with facts and it's infuriating. I don't know whether or not I'm right but I want people to organize.
I invited you to open up on who is strategic and you presumed I was attacking you and never answered the question. I am trying to engage with you and work with you as I townread you but backlash game after game is just bullshit.