The only town motivation I can think of for redirecting is to divert a kill from Titus to you. I don't think you're actually scummy to justify that though; there are better targets for that.In post 1680, Elements wrote:All those assuming the redirection is from scum, why?
In post 1688, kitten around wrote:CSF probably just wrong, one of Prince/Math scum.
Why is one of Prince/Math scum? Do you think you've been town enough such that they shouldn't be voting you?In post 1689, kitten around wrote:Whichever one is scum here definitely doesn’t want a 1v1 with me but I’ll more than happily engage with it to take out scum. Try me.In post 1688, kitten around wrote:CSF probably just wrong, one of Prince/Math scum.
I think this is a townpost, reminds me of meIn post 1724, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think the bolded reaction is a bit premature. Your wagon fell apart very quickly, and now no one is voting youIn post 1695, Quiet Owl wrote:i haven't put much effort into defending myself becausei see my elimination as inevitable. i don't act like normal town. never have, probably never will. therefore i am trying to arrange my iso to be useful after my death, which will prove my alignment and in theory then be helpful. arguing over my alignment is a distraction, and i think it's very very easy for scum to get brownie points by going after me.
Not sure how I feel about the rest of the post tbh
You force reveal of one of most powerful roles in the game.
the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
I wonder what idiot would shot mason claim.In post 1733, Elements wrote:the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
Is this a jab at my pushing for limming mason N_M that game?In post 1734, Enchant wrote:I wonder what idiot would shot mason claim.In post 1733, Elements wrote:the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
yes and then mislimming me at 4 ppl elo.In post 1735, Elements wrote:Is this a jab at my pushing for limming mason N_M that game?In post 1734, Enchant wrote:I wonder what idiot would shot mason claim.In post 1733, Elements wrote:the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
are you even reading this game?In post 1734, Enchant wrote:I wonder what idiot would shot mason claim.In post 1733, Elements wrote:the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
partiallyIn post 1737, Gimli wrote:are you even reading this game?In post 1734, Enchant wrote:I wonder what idiot would shot mason claim.In post 1733, Elements wrote:the hypothetical was to swap titus out of a potential vig shot to save her as mis-lim materialIn post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
why notIn post 1739, Gimli wrote:why would town redirector redirect from titus to elements though? anyway
If Elements is scum and Titus is town, why wouldn't she bus drive herself with Titus?In post 1732, Enchant wrote:If it was mafia redirector, they just swap them with some unprotected lurker and kill titus unopposed.
In post 1738, Gimli wrote:but enchant has a point, redirector shouldn't claim yo
Yeah exactly, i think it was a scum actionIn post 1739, Gimli wrote:why would town redirector redirect from titus to elements though? anyway
DieIn post 1744, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:In post 1738, Gimli wrote:but enchant has a point, redirector shouldn't claim yoYeah exactly, i think it was a scum actionIn post 1739, Gimli wrote:why would town redirector redirect from titus to elements though? anyway
I think it's worth claiming, because if no one claims it, it's very likely we have scum in titus and elements, and that's important knowledge