In post 163, biancospino wrote:
This is a thing that Aureal also did, and it does sit a bit uneasy with me, I'm not convinced that it's fair to say that Enchant was backtracking. They said that neither of their picks were Mafia, and then revealed a set of pick descriptions that were not of Mafia picks. Aureal did at some point imply that this there was a contradiction there because some of those picks
could
be assigned to Mafia, but... I don't see it?
I also don't see what sort of backtracting could Drew possibly have seen here exactly? I would like clarifications, I'm open to admit having misunderstood someone along the way.
At this point I'm thinking some of it might just be a problem I have with understanding what Enchant is trying to say, since the grammar is quite lacking in clarity there. As for this... I dunno, it just sort of felt like the initial "I don't really have mafia picks" might have been an attempt to brush off the idea of just doing mafia ones? It just doesn't sit quite right with me.
For the record, I am open to the idea of sharing info, but I expect reasoned discussion about why it's expected to be beneficial to the town. This clearly seems to be beyond this group, so I'm fine with how we've moved past it.
furtiveglance wrote:
1) Because it's based on Enchant's bad mech argument. Why would Mafia enter the game and suggest something that's bound to get scumread?
So that's a "too scummy to be scum" argument? If it's so obviously scummy, why did so many people shrug it off?
2) No, they did comment on our argument and called both/all arguments 'weak'. They refused to pick who was townier between us, which I think is +scum.
You've got a weird way of thinking.
furtiveglance wrote: In post 178, Aureal wrote:And that's not even a good representation of my Enchant read.
It is literally why you voted them, I read that post. Please disabuse me of this notion if you can.
You were talking about my vote remaining there, not why I voted in the first place. Vote has remained there for the reasons given in my post earlier, none of which was "bad strategy". I could also further add things like "self-voting/threatening to", "posting little but random useless comments that just seem to want to stir the pot" or "suggesting a lim for no discernable reason."
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
-furtiveglance