I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
In post 328, BloodB0t wrote:
I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
Just checked Titus and no evidence that she’s lurking. Doesn’t of course mean that’s impossible but this game is the last thread she’s posted in.
In post 328, BloodB0t wrote:
I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
what theory of lurkscums?
i had no theory on that. people not posting does not equal lurking lol
ill explain more on that later, when i hear more on this specific player to confirm what i had thought.
so, in conclusion u dont have no one as scum?
"With grandpa in the game the postcount goes up and up and up and up...." - T3 | I have a GTKAS page now. Feel free to ask me questions here!
I don't like the last posts of Blood. The Titus comment looks appeasing. Also the comment on Mena is just weird -- @blood, what relevance do you think the absence of votes has? Do you think there is some blatant reason why people should be voting there but yet haven't?
I don't like the last posts of Blood. The Titus comment looks appeasing. Also the comment on Mena is just weird -- @blood, what relevance do you think the absence of votes has? Do you think there is some blatant reason why people should be voting there but yet haven't?
VOTE: bloodb0t
+townping
we are on the same wavelengh with the line of reasoning that comes from a townmindset. its more of a "since im thinking this and im town, you probably are town too."
"With grandpa in the game the postcount goes up and up and up and up...." - T3 | I have a GTKAS page now. Feel free to ask me questions here!
Tbh I'm still quite unconvinced on Imaginality. There is something that rubs me in the wrong way about 155, even in context, but I may just be in a tunnel.
I'm also particularly interested on Imaginality green read on Blood, @Imaginality?
In post 23, imaginality wrote:
@BloodB0t, the way that chess game shows pieces in the wrong places is like some demonic incestuous offspring of chess, checkers and time travel. If the intent is to gain advantage by making everyone else's heads ache then job done!
@
Drew not sure I'd go as far as policy limming a hydra
, but I do like the idea of putting hydras under pressure early as I always find them hard to read.
VOTE: Defective Agency
Positioning himself as reasonable
Spoiler: 2
In post 102, imaginality wrote:
My vote on the hydra was rvs in that I didn't have any reason to vote them based on play (it was page 1!) but motivated in that I dislike playing with hydras. I just find them hard to read (also because I generally don't know the meta of the players in them) plus some of them post too much.
So I figure seeing how they react to a wagon on them could help with reading them plus given the choice between catching a scum solo player and a scum hydra I'd rather the latter.
Never heard of Doctor Drew or the running joke.
I don't see posting chatGPT answers as copying Porkens' gimmick in this particular game (if Porkens does that in other games then it would be if someone does it there).
I am also staggered Defective Agency thought I was being serious with that chatGPT post or in general (until now).
I have a hard time believing they genuinely believed that. My vote stays.
Incredibly safe position to take as scum with the omgus. We're already opposing him, so he just accepts and cements that.
In post 115, Morning Tweet wrote:
The subplot where on one side, ChatGPT/Porkens says its suspicious for players to cast doubt on ChatGPT -- and on the other, bloodb0t finds Porkens suspicious for practically assimilatign with the AI, seems notable. I don't like bloodbot's repeated insistence against ChatGPT which feels ultimatley like a distraction to me. Like it mostly goes without saying that ChatGPT isn't exactly sherlock holms yet bloodb0t seems to feel the need to discredit it anyway. Poor learning model
On that front, some musings:
Do you think 96 is a direct neutral chatGPT output or is it
Porkens' own content in chatGPT style (perhaps rephrased by chatGPT), or chatGPT told to argue a specific view?
If it's the latter:
Do you think continuing to mix chatGPT and their own content (if Porkens were to continue to do so) is scummy, towny or NAI?
Bonus thought: compare and contrast playing using chatGPT as support (either for private discussion or for content generation) with playing in a hydra
Not really directed at anyone, just musing.
You could have these thoughts in an MD thread or pre-game. Much easier content to put out than your thoughts on other players.
In post 185, Defective Agency wrote:
How many scums are we thinking because if it's 3 I've already found them all
Maybe not but I've got it down to [Dei Ex Machina, imaginality, narrow parking, Menalque, Porkens]
Should be 3 and one 3p, at least per the queue post.
Also, I somewhat disagree with that list. Are Dei there chiefly just because of their KT vote?
PE: god, that rap was awful
This was already clarified earlier in the thread (119). And Defective Agency has been following the thread, so the "how many scums are we thinking" in the post bianco quoted here seems like a deliberate attempt on DA's part to appear uninformed.
This is an attempt to get us for 'fake townslipping' which is a really superficial and reachy thing to push us for. I hadn't checked the setup or seen anywhere that it was 9/3/1.
So yeah, bit of a scumcase for you Dei Ex Machina.
My vote stays
-Mr. Glance
Not in the mood to wagon imaginality day 1 as that leads to people doing stupid shit
In post 269, GrandpaMo wrote:
i lowkey forgot this game existed. just got prodded.
tldr; im a good prompt engineer for chatgpt, so if you want chatgpt to say anything, please tell me to do so, i can do it for u.
also u can find mafia by using specific parameters. u have to basically compose an algorithem for it to find mafia, by using percentages and specific criteria, u can find mafia lol . there is some subjectiviety, but if there is usually consensus on a specific person, then that subjectivity turns into possible criteria for person
In post 278, Porkens wrote:
Spare me. My posts were a lightning rod that generated the majority of content in this game so far. You are just nipping at my heels as a pet wagon while ignoring the e-2 situation completely.
In post 246, BloodB0t wrote:
wrt Porkens, I was lulzing and I'm not reading much into him doing it or 'reactively' dropping it. Though he does seem light on content. Not sure if this take from KT is AI.
I wasn't saying I agree with his take on MT, I just meant that I didn't know what he meant by "puffed up" and now I do.
On Menalque, I thought asking "Show me where bianco isn't being natural and genuine in 1086" would make more sense. And for some reason specifically asking for 3 posts seemed weird to me. My read on Menalque is mostly based on vibes and that question for me was the tipping point for me to want to articulate it, but I'm not always good at articulating good reasons for my reads even though they can be right while nobody else sees it.
In post 328, BloodB0t wrote:
I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
I don't really object to your sus. Not lurking but I didn't vla. I didn't expect to get my ass kicked at work. It's catching up with me.
In post 328, BloodB0t wrote:
I was more coming at it just wanting to hear more about imaginality, my read on him was/is still null. I've only given your posts a cursory glance btw.
I mean I do suspect Titus but there's not much to go on. It does fit with your theory of lurkscums.
This game deserves a bit more of my attention and I might do a whole readthrough by the end of the day, if not then I will tomorrow. atm I kinda scumread DEM too but this is a very lazy take, subject to change. Kinda suprised nobody has voted Menalque either but yeah I don't have much more to offer right now.
I don't really object to your sus. Not lurking but I didn't vla. I didn't expect to get my ass kicked at work. It's catching up with me.
fwiw I think also I scumread titus that one game where i became angry with u lol because I thought u were lurking . I think u flipped town
"With grandpa in the game the postcount goes up and up and up and up...." - T3 | I have a GTKAS page now. Feel free to ask me questions here!
yall r hilarious
yall r hilarious
