Why are people still in RVS stage. Anyone have any actual reads?
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Let's play a game. Who has been the scummiest person so far? Everyone give an answer. Let's see how far all of your hope can get us.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Ah, yes. Our first battle of wits. Lets see whose hope is stronger.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Stephen is trying to justify his RVS vote on me calling my reads fake, with the intention of parking his vote and not really contributing to the game. You can call anyone here awkward, scummy, etc, but that's having an actual scum agenda
In post 185, Pink Ball wrote:
Stephen is trying to justify his RVS vote on me calling my reads fake, with the intention of parking his vote and not really contributing to the game. You can call anyone here awkward, scummy, etc, but that's having an actual scum agenda
You're just trying to antagonize me at this point. I had two posts before you voted me, if your vote wasn't random, then my theory of you voteparking is still right, even more right I'd say
In post 174, Pink Ball wrote:
But I assume you're taking that "being too serious" as not being scum indicative since you didn't vote, right?
i don't know them and it's page 7 so that's a fair assumption.
Who do you think is the scummiest so far? Even if it's just a very small read?
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
You're just trying to antagonize me at this point. I had two posts before you voted me, if your vote wasn't random, then my theory of you voteparking is still right, even more right I'd say
if I was parking my vote on you and twiddling my thumbs and doing shit-all and you were a person with like one vote maybe you could claim voteparking is scummy because I would be literally doing nothing
as it stands sir you are the leading wagon and I am trying to kill your slot so calling my vote "voteparking" is silly.
You should say my push on you is scummy because ??? - you can add the reason in there.
You just started pushing me after I started pushing you, don't try to change the facts. You were actually twiddling your thumbs and doing shit-all until I pushed you. You're justifying my comments, not contradicting them
You're just trying to antagonize me at this point. I had two posts before you voted me, if your vote wasn't random, then my theory of you voteparking is still right, even more right I'd say
In post 195, Pink Ball wrote:
You just started pushing me after I started pushing you, don't try to change the facts. You were actually twiddling your thumbs and doing shit-all until I pushed you. You're justifying my comments, not contradicting them
In post 185, Pink Ball wrote:
Stephen is trying to justify his RVS vote on me calling my reads fake, with the intention of parking his vote and not really contributing to the game. You can call anyone here awkward, scummy, etc, but that's having an actual scum agenda
Here. The only post between you and me to this point with some actual arguments and not an RVS vote or a "fake reads" statement. You were trying to be funny, you actually were, but that's it
-- Or here if you just wanna see fae/faer used in context.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
