vote scum and you'll win a whopper
BK, kill it with fire.
Tempting, but I really don't feel like voting town today. Maybe tomorrow. Today I'm gonna vote for scum.In post 495, petapan wrote:vote ydrasse, her vibes are offIn post 493, GreyICE wrote:God am I supposed to read this game and shit? It’s 20 pages long and a bunch of furries in zebra outfits are harassing grown men and making me watch.
Someone give me a good vote and a halfway decent reason. Not you LLD.
You can ignore me.
Oh but no unwnd. You killed yourself because you are a very logical person.In post 963, unwnd wrote: It's all documented where I think you wouldn't let yourself play so sloppily as scum
I maintain that
Can you see it I wonder? Mmmm. Small oopsies.In post 754, unwnd wrote: Little bit different readlist but I'm piecing shit together
Bell/Notty
--
Ceph
Peta
--
Marci
KT
LLD
GreyICE (complete fucking null)
Ydra (The line about marci coaching is hmmmery)
Taly
StD
--
Dunnstral
Lukewarm
Oh no. I'm criticizing that when you made this list you forgot the central mechanic of the game. This is, after all, PYP.In post 969, unwnd wrote:You believe that I am criticizing my wagon in relation to my reads which (besides you) are all nearing the bottomIn post 967, GreyICE wrote:Oh but no unwnd. You killed yourself because you are a very logical person.In post 963, unwnd wrote: It's all documented where I think you wouldn't let yourself play so sloppily as scum
I maintain that
Can you see it I wonder? Mmmm. Small oopsies.In post 754, unwnd wrote: Little bit different readlist but I'm piecing shit together
Bell/Notty
--
Ceph
Peta
--
Marci
KT
LLD
GreyICE (complete fucking null)
Ydra (The line about marci coaching is hmmmery)
Taly
StD
--
Dunnstral
Lukewarm
It's the #4 post from our good friend Pookie of course!In post 978, notscience wrote: What the fuck is a number four bear bc I’m still confused what I’m missing exactly
They could of course. Hoopla pulled that gambit in the first PYP I played in, and I called it out (to famously mixed results). But the thing is, they have to think "I'm the sort of player that can benefit more from the town cred if the other half dies than getting good PRs."In post 988, Ydrasse wrote: i feel like in a recent pyp scum picked same numbers
i might be hallucinating
I think town is looking to solve game. I think they're going to use what tools they have. Sure, some people don't give a shit. Does that strike you as Uwnwd? As scum you have to fake that. Not telling you much if I tell you scum know all the townies, right? You can't legitimately scumhunt, you have to fake it. All of that is about fitting in. And moving a few names around because it "looks wrong" or "I wouldn't be townreading that person" is common.In post 999, petapan wrote:i'm fairly sure in the ensuing decade+ of this setup being run scum have never doubled up, not once. letting town get first shot at the strong PRs is too risky. Was the same when I drafted as scum - we discussed it but chickened out.
now, that being said, let me interrogate your view here - you say unwnd is scum for not paying attention to the draft numbers when he was forming his reads list and putting together two players who can't be scum. what make you certain scum is unlikely to think about/care about such things, as opposed to town who is simply going by feels on day 1 and not thinking about guessing the exact team? maybe he wasn't even paying attention to the numbers. in my experience i feel like town is a lot more likely to be careless about those things and make reads in a free association way, where scum are going to be more concerned with making sure everything makes 'sense' from a draft logic pov
Off of vague 'interactions'? That's real hard to do. Off of mechanical stuff like picking the same number? That's much firmer. Again, I'd go so far as to say that I'd prefer to eliminate someone who picked a double number this round (well aware that's me too). That's how important it is, it's as far as to narrow my potential pool of people I'm interested in down to 8. Which I'm aware eliminates Uwnwd from my pool, but dayum I do not like them.In post 1114, Lukewarm wrote:Ah.
Do you think that at this point in the game that Unwnd would be thinking of his scum reads in terms of how they mesh together as a team?
Here, I'll make things easy for you. I have a cop guilty on Dunnstral. Vote.In post 2118, fferyllt wrote:Apparently not one of what I thought you had!In post 22, notscience wrote: On the off chance ffery replaces in I have 1 so far
Come on man, there's a cop guilty. Vote.In post 2124, notscience wrote: Let her catch up first then we’ll chat
We've been punished for our sinsIn post 2126, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:you petapandered to the threadIn post 2125, petapan wrote: what did i even do in the first 10 pages
Trying to work yourself up for another day of chainsawing for Dunnstral?In post 2140, unwnd wrote: I don't feel demotivated at all
You make the noises, but I see no vote.In post 2147, unwnd wrote: Oh no don't get it twisted, Dunnstral fits in those 4 I talked about
I'm very interested in why you're not voting Dunnstral.In post 2164, notscience wrote: GI I’m very interested in what you’re seeing about LLD
Yay!
Awwwww booo hooo, it's so unfair when the moderator sends me your alignment.In post 2215, Dunnstral wrote: GreyIce is hiding behind hypo claims and doesn't have any opinions other than me and unwnd being mafia
What possibility of failure? I'm not depicting a solution to anything, I wanna eliminate mafia.In post 2226, unwnd wrote: Yeah so.
It's all unproven but I maintain what I said about StD/Dunn having one scum. GI's hypo cop is it's own process. There's no amount of formulative play that answers for everything. I don't see the benefit in just following procedure with unknown variables at play. You also can't really quantify intuition and feelings as well. That feeling of 'one scum between' persists even if GI is depicting a solution for us. I agree with the practicality of it but what if it fails?
I don't understand where you're not accounting for failure, GI.
Yes, yes, I could have hard information. And if I don't, anyone we vote to eliminate without hard information is a gamble. Would I just gamble and vote someone without actually having hard information... I mean don't we work past that in the newbie queue? Like wow, if you don't have hard information you still vote, because bad eliminations might lose you the game but no eliminationsIn post 2231, unwnd wrote: You're pairing me with LLD/Dunn like it should follow procedure when we (or if) we eliminate Dunn?
If your results are real you're helping us win and good for you. If they're not then you can always say you were taking a gamble and it didn't pan out.
What part of my last post was aggressive or offensive? He makes no sense. He has the opportunity to explain himself, or better yet, change his behavior.In post 2247, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Hey so, I agree with you but the tone you're taking will only result in heckles being raised and you'll get nothing from Unwnd this way.
I recognize you scumread me so my voice saying this may just raise your own paranoia alarms but... Unwnd is town. So I'd appreciate if you approached this in a manner that either let him prove that to you, or at least hang himself if you're really that convinced.
I mean I'm cheating because I know for a fact you're right. But if you want #2, I'd lean more STD.In post 2517, unwnd wrote: We're smart people.
There has to be scum between Dunn/StD/Marci.
Right? ..Right?
Like cop is easy for scum to fakeclaim. "I'm super cop. X is town. Y is town. Z is town. Look I know because they're not in the scum PT with me".In post 2531, Bell wrote: Hey, I did ask.
But I would like to selfishly continue to claim that I need a methodology and accept the criticism anyway.
If you actually think she's scum, then there's two possibilities:In post 2535, unwnd wrote: Marci is just there because I see people still want marci dead (Peta, et al). I don't know what marci is up to but I've seen her come in here saying that we don't care about her reads and then someone will say 'Yeah Marci, we actually do' then she leaves. I have to ask myself if I want that type of play to be anywhere near the top-half of a readlist.
As far as her claim goes? I believe someone said that outing her result gives scum a lead on other PRs because she claimed her target didn't visit anyone.
There's three whole targeting roles left alive that could have submitted a night action last night. (Doctor, Ascetic Cop, Draft Cop) If she's picking someone scummy who is middle/end of the pack (because none of the investigative roles are targeting the top 4, where scum are going to be shooting), what are scum going to potentially learn? Lukewarm/Fferlyt doesn't have one of those three roles? Gee. I bet they'd have never guessed.In post 2539, unwnd wrote: Pray tell how the first point is absolutely true? Let's say she's real. If her check is on
1) A member who didn't submit a kill
2) A vanilla townie who doesn't have an ability
Then that's basically nothing gained.
I see where you're coming from though in regards to if she's scum though. If I were to be blunt, I feel indifferent. She's not town on my list and she's a lim candidate so she's there with the other two
...In post 2544, petapan wrote:no she can literally be a tracker who is still scum? what are you on aboutIn post 2538, GreyICE wrote:If you actually think she's scum, then there's two possibilities:In post 2535, unwnd wrote: Marci is just there because I see people still want marci dead (Peta, et al). I don't know what marci is up to but I've seen her come in here saying that we don't care about her reads and then someone will say 'Yeah Marci, we actually do' then she leaves. I have to ask myself if I want that type of play to be anywhere near the top-half of a readlist.
As far as her claim goes? I believe someone said that outing her result gives scum a lead on other PRs because she claimed her target didn't visit anyone.
- She's actually the Tracker at which pointscum know the fucking results
- She has to fakeclaim, meaning she either fakeclaims a target on a scumbuddy, or risks fucking it up.
Or you could think she's town. Do you think she's town?
I mean she's playing poorly. But then we also have to consider that she's playing poorly. It'd be really poor play to want attention and then kind of have some half baked stuff and decide it's too much effort to do and kind of flake. But if I had a nickel for everyone flaky awful townie... I'd have enough nickels to throw at flaky awful townies.In post 2547, unwnd wrote:Bolded - She's not really being cooperative. You assume this methodology follows someone who is paying attention and it's likely they're not. No disrespect to her on a personal level we're friends but yeah. I also don't think she really cares about her awesome role because a lot of her bemoaning comes from 'I'm not being listened to' which I think maybe half or more of the plist has said 'ok Marci, the floor is yours!'
And then no response
You'd be amazed how little you care about reading someone's posts when you know they're scum.In post 2551, Dunnstral wrote:I wasn't the one who brought up hypocops ladIn post 2542, GreyICE wrote: As for Hypocops, we should have a long talk in the postgame about why they're very bad and you should have never fallen for Dunn's gambit.
Like the idea of Marci actually going and looking up the other PYP game is so weird to me. Like it's kinda tryhard, but like it's not completely out of character.In post 2552, unwnd wrote: Coaching would definitely happen in this plist but my grace with peta is that yeah
No doubt he'd be a complete saltmeister if marci was just doing this shit as partners. Peta went up for me because 1) he's here 2) he's posting reasonably 3) holding him in this odd paranoia state where ohh he could be snowing me is not doing me any favor. Like I have to trust the person putting the effort in and if they really feel that brazen to make a point to fool me then fuck it right? Marci is not doing anything and has chosen to be this way.
In post 2579, Ydrasse wrote: when these wagons end up t v t and all wolves off wagon
"PYP setup" is a subset of everything, a category also labeled "things you do not understand" so it makes you angry.In post 2979, Firebringer wrote: Also i have played PYP like 3 times now, and i still refuse to try to understand the setup.
theres like a draft and shit. Beyond that i don't care all this role and setup talk in this game type always makes me turn of brain.
It doesn't seem like a complex setup but i dislike the design of it so i refuse to understand it.
So Taly/RH9 is the only one of those you even think might be scum, but "all the wolves off the wagon"?In post 3010, Ydrasse wrote:at that point in time it was ffery/marci/rh9. of those the only slot i'm interested voting now is the rh9 slot.In post 3009, GreyICE wrote:In post 2579, Ydrasse wrote: when these wagons end up t v t and all wolves off wagon
not voting [4]:
fferyllt, marcistar, RH9, notscience,
Specifically which of these do you have a problem with?
I don't disagree with the general thrust, but this post is a little shade cast-y
Like... what
My opinion about you? If you demonstrate an IQ above room temperature I'll swallow my hat in shock.In post 3012, Firebringer wrote:see you haven't changedIn post 3011, GreyICE wrote: "PYP setup" is a subset of everything, a category also labeled "things you do not understand" so it makes you angry.
More like I'm not sure how marci's tracker information changes that much on Taly/Fire.In post 3026, Ydrasse wrote: that comes across as mean regardless but ... yeah >.>
Oh one up. My bad. Does not really change anything, but thanks for the heads up scum-buddyIn post 3032, Dunnstral wrote: Marci's result is on Ydrasse; not on Taly slot