ofc the same types of dynamics occuring between kira and follower will occur between detective and assistant, including wrt pushing people to e-1 and what will each claim and whatnot. when you kira hunt you will eventually push town PRs, there's no way around it.
In post 847, Gimli wrote:
the detective and the kira will play similarly
Knowing this don't you think it would be wise to push people for reasons other than how they are playing? If you think Kira/detective will lurk/not contribute much then why are you using these things as your sole reason to push these people?
In post 849, Gimli wrote:
I just put her there cause std defended her in a premeditaded manner. i wasn't making a detective read, i just put a pair there for flimsy reasoning
That's silly. Assistant might also defend the detective in this way. You're ignoring that when you push
In post 849, Gimli wrote:
I just put her there cause std defended her in a premeditaded manner. i wasn't making a detective read, i just put a pair there for flimsy reasoning
That's silly. Assistant might also defend the detective in this way. You're ignoring that when you push
I'm literally acknowledging that? std did what assistant would do to detective. and what follower will do to kira. can you parse the difference? cause I can't mate, unless I'm the assistant or the detective I can't tell the difference.
I can't parse the difference and because of that I wouldn't push people for having that playstyle knowing they could be Kira/detective. I would find other things to look at. But you're not and I feel like that's coming from a wolf mindset
what does it mean 'its just gimli'? there are three scums, and you already waffled this answer before because you think I can be either kira or follower, so how come 'its just gimli' is a real thing you're thinking? flipping me ends the game, thats what 'just gimli' means?
In post 862, Gimli wrote:
what does it mean 'its just gimli'? there are three scums, and you already waffled this answer before because you think I can be either kira or follower, so how come 'its just gimli' is a real thing you're thinking? flipping me ends the game, thats what 'just gimli' means?
Obviously I'm not using "just" as in you're the only scum. What? I think you're probably a follower though tbh
So I kinda like kawaii for town when reading backwards, but it’s very soft and probably will change. I like the responses so far.
I kinda have std as a soft town read mainly because I don’t think scum std would try to stick his neck and defend me if he was scum on a flip less game.
UNVOTE: std
I’m 50/50 on gimli. So hunting for associates without flips just lines up chains of elims with very little information. I just don’t see the full motive on either alignment for what he’s doing.
I still like the emjo guy even tho he jumped on my bandwagon like a kid going “oooh I want candy from this guy in a van”.
Which leaves me with gander and black.
And idk
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 870, Malakittens wrote:
I just don’t see the full motive on either alignment for what he’s doing.
The wolf motive is pretty clear imo. Stick your neck out D1 and try to control the game so no one suspects you. Try to vote for people that are lurky while pushing the idea that lurky probably means detective, but cover it up by saying Kira is probably lurky too. This also clears himself due to his own aggressive behavior. Push wagons to try and pressure the lurky detective to claim. Hop off and push someone else that might be detective after you drop the read on the other player
In post 857, Black wrote:
So nothing changed to make you think mala is more likely to be Kira and yet here you are pushing her
Take note that Gimli dodged this observation twice
I stand corrected here. Gimli said he thinks mala is Kira because he townreads kawaii. That's not a good reason to move someone from "probably detective" to "probably Kira" and then push them though
