In post 175, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
you're new here, and i've been sort of nice so far but I have a limit.
I do not generally explain townreads. The answer you get this time is GUT >=D!
The more detailed answer is I saw something within their play that indicated they are town within those first like, 5 posts, mostly an exchange with you.
What that is, I'm not explaining.
She's lying. She'll explain her town reads, in great detail, any time it suits her. It's mostly because the town read is weak and for nebulous reasons, and if she gives details then scum-black can play into them. So basically if the read is weak, there's no good motive to give any details because if you're wrong all it does is encourage scum to play into a confirmation bias (and if the logic becomes accepted it becomes a blind spot that can last until endgame).
Besides, we're only eliminating one person today. That means no matter what, there's twelve people we're not eliminating, and any good townie would tell you that's eleven living people too many. So discussing the elimination is far more productive.
So, moving past the theory discussion Rogue, you tossed down your vote on post 21. That's fine, it's a good vote for post 21. But here's the thing, unless something has changed, I have to assume that your reason is the same as it was in post 21. So has anything progressed for you? Because I can be sold on wagons, but unless you've got the mother of all Stoofer tells I'm not doing it off a post 21 read.