I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
pedit; ask my parents tbh
I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
The real question is would firebringer and isis think it’s meaningful outside an open setup?In post 2850, Ausuka wrote:I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
pedit; ask my parents tbh
In post 2842, Comus wrote: I don't think I care all that much about victory,
Please play to the rules.In post 1, MegAzumarill wrote:¤ Play to win - but most importantly, have fun!
Hobittses are weeeird maaanIn post 2851, Menalque wrote: @comus you really think this setup passes? Like I’m generally not a huge fan of trying to outguess the mod but I just don’t think this ever passes review
Comus: VT
Gimli: VT
geraintm: VT
Sky: Informed Detective
Enchant: Modified Doctor Shield
Menalque: VT
+4 VTs
Vs
3 mafia goon
HiderIn post 2804, Klick wrote: Can you confirm quickly what your role is?
I don't really think so, no?In post 2854, Menalque wrote:The real question is would firebringer and isis think it’s meaningful outside an open setup?In post 2850, Ausuka wrote:I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
pedit; ask my parents tbh
Sorry I only listen to my preciousssssss you're not my precioussssssIn post 2856, Klick wrote:In post 2842, Comus wrote: I don't think I care all that much about victory,Please play to the rules.In post 1, MegAzumarill wrote:¤ Play to win - but most importantly, have fun!
So you think sky has to be town?In post 2860, Ausuka wrote:I don't really think so, no?In post 2854, Menalque wrote:The real question is would firebringer and isis think it’s meaningful outside an open setup?In post 2850, Ausuka wrote:I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
pedit; ask my parents tbh
Sad u didn’t ask me what I meant by this ausukaIn post 2852, Menalque wrote: Ausuka, your role is being upgraded
Policy lims are still a thing that exist and can be used! And if towns actually started using them this would be less of a problemIn post 2859, Klick wrote: I hate that site meta has basically become 'be right on Day 1 or Day 2 otherwise the two townies who don't care about winning will make it endgame'
I missed itIn post 2863, Menalque wrote:Sad u didn’t ask me what I meant by this ausukaIn post 2852, Menalque wrote: Ausuka, your role is being upgraded
I mean yeah kindaIn post 2862, Menalque wrote:So you think sky has to be town?In post 2860, Ausuka wrote:I don't really think so, no?In post 2854, Menalque wrote:The real question is would firebringer and isis think it’s meaningful outside an open setup?In post 2850, Ausuka wrote:I mean I agree but shrug I don't think named townie is meaningful outside open setupsIn post 2847, Menalque wrote: I think MG suggested it would basically just be like a named townie and I can buy that
pedit; ask my parents tbh
If you believe this why weren't you trying to policy comus earlier when it wasn't the day before elo with a 1v1In post 2864, Menalque wrote:Policy lims are still a thing that exist and can be used! And if towns actually started using them this would be less of a problemIn post 2859, Klick wrote: I hate that site meta has basically become 'be right on Day 1 or Day 2 otherwise the two townies who don't care about winning will make it endgame'
You are now a loud visionary double voterIn post 2865, Ausuka wrote:I missed itIn post 2863, Menalque wrote:Sad u didn’t ask me what I meant by this ausukaIn post 2852, Menalque wrote: Ausuka, your role is being upgraded
What do u mean
any modifiers??In post 2858, KawaiiKame wrote:HiderIn post 2804, Klick wrote: Can you confirm quickly what your role is?
NoIn post 2871, Skygazer wrote:any modifiers??In post 2858, KawaiiKame wrote:HiderIn post 2804, Klick wrote: Can you confirm quickly what your role is?
oh noIn post 2864, Menalque wrote:Policy lims are still a thing that exist and can be used! And if towns actually started using them this would be less of a problemIn post 2859, Klick wrote: I hate that site meta has basically become 'be right on Day 1 or Day 2 otherwise the two townies who don't care about winning will make it endgame'
Disagree but I guess that’s a separate pointIn post 2866, Klick wrote: I have ethical issues with them
Blacklists are better than playing with someone just to vote them out at the start
Hang on, im not saying I want to policy comus here, i was talking about the problem klick is speaking about in generalIn post 2868, Ausuka wrote:If you believe this why weren't you trying to policy comus earlier when it wasn't the day before elo with a 1v1In post 2864, Menalque wrote:Policy lims are still a thing that exist and can be used! And if towns actually started using them this would be less of a problemIn post 2859, Klick wrote: I hate that site meta has basically become 'be right on Day 1 or Day 2 otherwise the two townies who don't care about winning will make it endgame'