Rapid fire posting without substantive content, with a post asking why someone who was not voting you had a vote on you.In post 339, Klick wrote:What was bad about them?In post 337, Drixx wrote:Okay. But there's a clear 220 post gap after you announced V/LA, and you clearly made a re-entry with a few posts in a row, and they were bad. Responding with "I'm still on V/LA" is disingenuous at best.In post 307, Klick wrote:I'm still on V/LAIn post 291, Drixx wrote:FB, Kuribo, Dunn and TSQ all seem town to me. I don't like Klick's ISO, most especially the re-entry from VLA.
No gymnastics here my friend. Trying to use an aggressive question to get someone to accept the premise is an old debate trick, as you are certainly aware.In post 340, Titus wrote:Can I get your gym membership?In post 335, Drixx wrote:LAMIST = look at me I'm so townie. Titus used an old trick with that post to Shea. Asserted being town and pressed for town reads. Many people reading that would feel pressured to respond, and the premise that Shea thinks Titus is town would be passively accepted.In post 309, Dunnstral wrote:What does this mean?In post 291, Drixx wrote:LAMIST coaching?In post 121, Titus wrote: Shea, who, besides me, is town?
There's also an angle there that Titus is capable of and would play as scum: tagging her partner to get them engaged in the game, and doing so in a way that looks like she is trying to pocket them, so that if she gets roped, the partner looks good on the later re-read.
I'm also concerned that Titus suggested I was sidestepping, especially after my first post.
Let's try some actual engagement please.