Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
I don't get itIn post 24, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:History of this game, statistics, number picking logic...In post 22, Alisae wrote:so like, what is this based on?In post 18, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:wolves plural? I don't, or at least, if they did it's a gambit and I'm happy to call the bluff killing there day 1 and leaving it on the tableIn post 14, Alisae wrote: why do you think wolves picked 6?
Wolf singular? Because in this game where 3 numbers overlap in pick, it's pretty likely there is at least one scum in the grouping.
it's not 100% but nothing is, but it's significantly increased.
Groovy~
From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.
okay, so do you know why my team was able to predict that we should never pick 6?In post 27, Alisae wrote:I don't get itIn post 24, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:History of this game, statistics, number picking logic...In post 22, Alisae wrote:so like, what is this based on?In post 18, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:wolves plural? I don't, or at least, if they did it's a gambit and I'm happy to call the bluff killing there day 1 and leaving it on the tableIn post 14, Alisae wrote: why do you think wolves picked 6?
Wolf singular? Because in this game where 3 numbers overlap in pick, it's pretty likely there is at least one scum in the grouping.
it's not 100% but nothing is, but it's significantly increased.
Burt is Mugi (eyebrows)
I'm literally explaining it, and you're literally not engaging with the explinations.In post 30, Ythan wrote:From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.
Show me where you explained before my post then.In post 34, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm literally explaining it, and you're literally not engaging with the explinations.In post 30, Ythan wrote:From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.
You're just saying "it doesn't make sense and you're not explaining" which is an incredibly frustrating way to go about this.
If you don't understand, ask and assess then, instead of whatever this assumption shit is.
if 2 wolves, they're gambiting that there isn't more than 1 wolf in a pile when wolves get to group draft together, which can bring wolves to endgame.In post 35, Alisae wrote: So why would wolves want to opt for 6?
Ah yes, that old chestnut of you asking me on the TOP OF PAGE FUCKING 2 to explain in EXTENSIVE DETAIL something I am explaining truthfully and fielding questions about AS YOU POST IT.In post 36, Ythan wrote:Show me where you explained before my post then.In post 34, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm literally explaining it, and you're literally not engaging with the explinations.In post 30, Ythan wrote:From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.
You're just saying "it doesn't make sense and you're not explaining" which is an incredibly frustrating way to go about this.
If you don't understand, ask and assess then, instead of whatever this assumption shit is.
But you just said you did explain it...In post 39, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Ah yes, that old chestnut of you asking me on the TOP OF PAGE FUCKING 2 to explain in EXTENSIVE DETAIL something I am explaining truthfully and fielding questions about AS YOU POST IT.In post 36, Ythan wrote:Show me where you explained before my post then.In post 34, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'm literally explaining it, and you're literally not engaging with the explinations.In post 30, Ythan wrote:From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.
You're just saying "it doesn't make sense and you're not explaining" which is an incredibly frustrating way to go about this.
If you don't understand, ask and assess then, instead of whatever this assumption shit is.
Tensing matters, reading is tech.In post 42, Ythan wrote:But you just saidIn post 39, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Ah yes, that old chestnut of you asking me on the TOP OF PAGE FUCKING 2 to explain in EXTENSIVE DETAIL something I am explaining truthfully and fielding questions about AS YOU POST IT.In post 36, Ythan wrote:Show me where you explained before my post then.In post 34, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 30, Ythan wrote:From my perspective it looks like you're full of shit though and you aren't actually explaining any of this math/history/logic in a way that makes me feel differently!In post 25, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Just because you're not capable of understanding the math and history behind this open setup that leads to this logic being correct does not make it not correct.In post 23, Ythan wrote: VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
The argument you are making does not make any sense to me.
<3
Nor does your lack of understanding it make me scum.I'm literally explaining it,and you're literally not engaging with the explinations.
You're just saying "it doesn't make sense and you're not explaining" which is an incredibly frustrating way to go about this.
If you don't understand, ask and assess then, instead of whatever this assumption shit is.you did explain it...
Cool so help me put some pressure on Imaginality and we'll get a read there together. Apologies if I'm not willing to trust someone in the 6s as the sole arbiter of reading that player. That requires me to townread you and you know that's not happening strongly day 1 basically ever.In post 44, Alisae wrote: I caught Marashu before and Imaginality I think I can get a good read on. Last time I played with him I pushed him as low hanging fruit and railroaded his elim extremely quickly.
You literally are. I'm literally attacking you for poking me about this instead of asking me questions to sort whether I'm right or not, and you're giving me bullshit reasons why you're not doing it, including CHANGING THE TENSING OF MY POST TO SUIT YOUR NEEDS which is hyper frustrating.In post 46, Ythan wrote: I'm not being defensive?? You're being like extremely defensive though. Are we reading the same game????