In post 4896, Klick wrote: Show me a single game in the last like 3 years where a Cop-equivalent chose to target their strongest scumread and I'll self-vote
![Image](https://i.ibb.co/g6MZ1Qg/3-DE76365-0-EDF-46-FD-A1-A6-6-A1-FEC416891.jpg)
In post 4896, Klick wrote: Show me a single game in the last like 3 years where a Cop-equivalent chose to target their strongest scumread and I'll self-vote
The reasons people suspect me are lazy and complete bullshit and make me have little faith that tomorrow will be any better without me aroundIn post 4898, Pink Ball wrote: Ok Klick assume you're already dead and we're on D4, I think this day will be more useful if you do that but this continous back and forth between you and everyone who suspects you is doing nothing for both parts
I don't think it's that weird as you're trying to depict it, specially coming from a newbie.In post 4896, Klick wrote: Show me a single game in the last like 3 years where a Cop-equivalent chose to target their strongest scumread and I'll self-vote
*die in the game obvIn post 4905, kuribo wrote: You were fucking scum before the soft guilty
You're just mad you're "caught for the wrong reasons"
I've been there it sucks.
Now die.
I don't see bad reasoning, I see a lot of little reasons that add up to a pretty self explanatory conclusion, but you're picking every little reason as if they were independent and acting like they aren't big enough to scumread you which is not the pointIn post 4902, Klick wrote: People need to be challenged on bad reasoning
That's been Klick's MO all gameIn post 4908, Pink Ball wrote:I don't see bad reasoning, I see a lot of little reasons that add up to a pretty self explanatory conclusion, but you're picking every little reason as if they were independent and acting like they aren't big enough to scumread you which is not the pointIn post 4902, Klick wrote: People need to be challenged on bad reasoning
I can see that and I would be too if I were the main focus of two consecutive days, but you're making yourself the main focus by answering every line of thought about you. My main problem is that nothing of value is being added in this conversations, there's nothing new about you being the prime suspect of the bunch.In post 4906, Klick wrote: That's probably fair PB, I'm just annoyed
And sometimes it's the "little things" that mean someone is scumIn post 4910, Klick wrote: 'Little reasons' don't exist
They aren't real
Things either mean someone is scum or they don't
Oh but there is a point to Klick doing it, because it WORKED YESTERDAYIn post 4912, Pink Ball wrote:I can see that and I would be too if I were the main focus of two consecutive days, but you're making yourself the main focus by answering every line of thought about you. My main problem is that nothing of value is being added in this conversations, there's nothing new about you being the prime suspect of the bunch.In post 4906, Klick wrote: That's probably fair PB, I'm just annoyed
It's surely not uncommon to cop your scum reads.In post 4892, Klick wrote: Since fucking when is the meta that people use checks on the slots they're most certain are scum lmfao
"It has a tail" - "sure could be any animal"In post 4911, Klick wrote: If people have several different 'little reasons' to scumread me and all of them are inaccurate then am I just meant to sit there and go 'oh ok I guess you believe that!' or am I meant to go 'hey, that doesn't actually make me scum'
viewtopic.php?t=89826#topIn post 4896, Klick wrote: Show me a single game in the last like 3 years where a Cop-equivalent chose to target their strongest scumread and I'll self-vote
That’s actually the best moment to trueclaimIn post 4809, Firebringer wrote: GIf i can appreciate the gambit game. But I don't think anyone is taking any of it seriously
HuhIn post 4918, GuyInFreezer wrote:viewtopic.php?t=89826#topIn post 4896, Klick wrote: Show me a single game in the last like 3 years where a Cop-equivalent chose to target their strongest scumread and I'll self-vote
Selfvote please