Pot callingIn post 6067, Drixx wrote: Dunn's ISO is a textbook example of "appearing to be active" while doing absolutely nothing.
Kettle blackIn post 6071, Drixx wrote: Oh hi, Bettlejuice
Pot callingIn post 6067, Drixx wrote: Dunn's ISO is a textbook example of "appearing to be active" while doing absolutely nothing.
Kettle blackIn post 6071, Drixx wrote: Oh hi, Bettlejuice
Hmmm yes it's not like I've interacted with people trying to sort them or given places to jump off discussionIn post 6054, Drixx wrote: You haven't done anything except make rage posts Kuribo. That's clearly not getting it done.
I invite you to go look at the amount of analyzing Cerb and I did in "Steven Universe" when we were IC. Give Cerb 90% of the credit, and I still worked circles around the effort on display here (and it wasn't a 90/10 situation, but I'm trying to make a point).
You can rage at me all you like. You can even vote me. Doesn't change the fact that all you're doing is raging, and the folks who share in your status are also just doing nothing useful.
I'll literally eat my shorts if town can manage a single scum lim at this point, let alone find a path to victory.
Oh but when I asked the guy to take a stance he just hit me with more whining and bitching about how all I do is rageIn post 6076, Dunnstral wrote: PB I feel your convo with Drixx is noise; it's just a slap fest.
Make Drixx take a stance on his stated reads.
Yeah look at what I posted in 6053In post 6081, kuribo wrote:Oh but when I asked the guy to take a stance he just hit me with more whining and bitching about how all I do is rageIn post 6076, Dunnstral wrote: PB I feel your convo with Drixx is noise; it's just a slap fest.
Make Drixx take a stance on his stated reads.
I think Drixx is in full antispew mode and is intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"In post 6080, Pink Ball wrote: If you think this isn't contributing I agree, this day should end and we should all vote Drixx
And for those of you who think GiF is towny. Look at their associatives with Drixx. They say they'll look at them but they don'tIn post 5199, GuyInFreezer wrote: I guess I could look at Drixx/STD in the meantime
But my vote ain’t moving today unless FA has the biggest wagon. I won’t be voting myself but I do accept my wagon today as well. NGL I really had a rough start with rl issue from the beginning and I’m prob gonna botch things in ELo so
Why aren't you responding to things?In post 6085, Drixx wrote: I don't have to worry about associative posting. I don't know who my teammates are.
Okay I'm gonna askIn post 6084, Dunnstral wrote:I think Drixx is in full antispew mode and is intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"In post 6080, Pink Ball wrote: If you think this isn't contributing I agree, this day should end and we should all vote Drixx
and so instead they take pot shots at kuribo and pink ball who are outside of the poe and outside of their consideration
I'm pretty sure it's the idea that a scum will reveal their partners.In post 6089, kuribo wrote:Okay I'm gonna askIn post 6084, Dunnstral wrote:I think Drixx is in full antispew mode and is intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"In post 6080, Pink Ball wrote: If you think this isn't contributing I agree, this day should end and we should all vote Drixx
and so instead they take pot shots at kuribo and pink ball who are outside of the poe and outside of their consideration
What the fuck is spew
I cannot, intentionally or unintentionally, reveal anyone I'm aligned with. I am uninformed of their identities.In post 6091, Dunnstral wrote: Read it like this:
"I think drixx is trying to avoid creating links between who they are and are not aligned with by intentionally avoiding giving hard stances on people "in the poe"
Just because you don't like the answers I already gave doesn't obligate me to give new ones.In post 6094, Dunnstral wrote: Drixx, one last time, why are you ignoring stuff?
I reject the idea that I could possibly discern actual associative links from false positives in a game state where no scum are known. There's no way to separate signal from noise.In post 6097, Dunnstral wrote: But you haven't given answers. You haven't responded at all to being asked to case your two strongest scumreads together.
To be clear, I'm not asking for these things for my own personal amusement or because it's funIn post 6097, Dunnstral wrote: But you haven't given answers. You haven't responded at all to being asked to case your two strongest scumreads together.