im thinking about drixx. i dunno if i'm a sucker for all that ATE or what. i'm also not sure that i agree with people's stance that doubting the lovers/caterers has to be scum widening the POE. i don't see why we can't use reads from previous days to help dictate our decisions on whether people are in the POE or not, regardless of how clear they may or may not appear to be.
ive gone back and forth over and over and i'm not sure how i ultimately feel about dunn's vote/push
In post 6128, Save The Dragons wrote:
i don't see why we can't use reads from previous days to help dictate our decisions on whether people are in the POE or not, regardless of how clear they may or may not appear to be.
Can you explain this a little further? I don't get what you're saying
In post 6122, Drixx wrote:
Lunch break: by definition nobody in the PoE can achieve a quick rope on someone else in the PoE without someone outside the PoE voting. Without a vote from one of you, you can sit and watch forever, and nobody else is gonna vote because they don't want to out themselves. I'm town and they know it.
If the game continues and I'm still alive, I'll try and have at least one ISO up before I sleep. If you rope me, I've already told you my order of suspicion and you'll have to do without me more deeply examining it, should the game continue.
OK but why haven't you voted back? From your POV isn't this a 1v1 if you think there's 4 scum?
Call it a mindset thing but if my number one suspect just voted me in a situation where the PoE is like this my first inclination would be to think they're confirmed scum from my pov and vote them.
Got some progress on ISO notes. Should be able to finish before sleep I think. May not comment heavily on today's posts because it's basically Dunn going "post your work" and me saying "it's not done yet" and various iterations of that.
@TSQ - You know the answer already because we've played together before. I very infrequently vote, and I am ridiculously careful about voting in potential end of game scenarios. I feel like you've played with me enough before to know that? Or with me and Cerb in hydra as Reasonably Rational? It might be the most consistent aspect of my play.
To be fair I don't remember games that well unless they happened recently, I tend to remember social interaction much more than game interaction so I guess its possible we've played together before and I just dont remember it.
I recognized your name in the player list, so I thought we must have played before. I assumed it would have been in a Varsoon game. Even if that's faulty memory on my part, it's also super easy to confirm by just going through games.
For example, in the game we're currently playing I voted a grand total of twice.
In post 6128, Save The Dragons wrote:
i don't see why we can't use reads from previous days to help dictate our decisions on whether people are in the POE or not, regardless of how clear they may or may not appear to be.
Can you explain this a little further? I don't get what you're saying
Don't just mech clear people when they're not mech cleared, use reads too. Some people are doing that though.
In post 6128, Save The Dragons wrote:
i don't see why we can't use reads from previous days to help dictate our decisions on whether people are in the POE or not, regardless of how clear they may or may not appear to be.
Can you explain this a little further? I don't get what you're saying
Don't just mech clear people when they're not mech cleared, use reads too. Some people are doing that though.
Yes, but how is this applicable to Drixx.
I see it applicable to you during this day, not Drixx during the entire game.
Drixx isn't stating paranoia, they are just berating others. They have made it pretty clear they suspect in the poe, Including you Save The Dragons, except they have been saying it could be 3 mafia
I'm talking about before D4 paranoia, not today's. Drixx has been slightly throwing jabs at mechanically conftown slots since early D2 and that's what I'm saying is fake paranoia to widen the PoE. Drixx is not doing what you're saying he's doing StD
