In post 299, Doctor Drew wrote: Dammit, I was so obv vig that game as well.....still bitter about it.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
In post 299, Doctor Drew wrote: Dammit, I was so obv vig that game as well.....still bitter about it.
In post 254, GuerillaWoo wrote: The wagon on Andante's pretty good, but Drew has said he wants to catch up so I don't know why he's being wagoned either.
If you think Andante is a good wagon, why did you never vote her?In post 256, GuerillaWoo wrote: I'll keep that in mind, ty
Came in with some brazen stuff and immediately self-declared obv town. The assumption ig is that scum wouldn't engage in any bravado or start questioning TRs on themselves? But that assumption is worth more when it's not Andante just saying "So what I did just now makes me locktown". It comes off as awareness of reads on yourself, and like, feigning confidence in RVS is just super easy to do. She did this after saying Implo is tryharding early.In post 255, Aisa wrote: Why is the wagon on Andante good?
It's a solid place for a wagon.
I need to reread the thread and try to figure out if I have any town reads based on anything said that early. I think Invis and skitter saw the logic innotseeing the logic in Andante's posts, but I'm not sure if there were any more, and I don't have a better yardstick for townie behavior thus far.
The wagons are wagons.In post 301, Alianna wrote: I still haven't read up on the wagons, let me do that.
That last line is exactly how I feel about your posting.In post 246, implosion wrote:Weirdly this is the first post that Alianna has made that maybe makes me think she's town :XIn post 237, Alianna wrote: Also, I forgot that Dunnstral was a player in this game.
Not really something I think scum would be inclined to say with Dunn either as town or as scum.
Most of her posting recently makes me go "yeah, this is well and good but well scum definitely can make this post"
what are these reasons?In post 305, Alianna wrote: The votes there are all meh for different reasons.
I wanted my 285 as a bit of a talking point, I feel it can lead to many directions.In post 305, Alianna wrote: Not interested in Andante wagon because I think she's town. The votes there are all meh for different reasons.
Drew wagon is somehow even more meh.
Cephrir and Invis are voting there because...why?
Woo wagon feels slightly better, at least on CSF's side. 250 raises some good points. Doc's 285 feels a little tinfoily though lol.
Yours is meh because I TR you (in general, not because of the vote) and I get where you're coming from, but I also don't think you're voting scum. So it kind of averages out.In post 307, Invisibility wrote:what are these reasons?In post 305, Alianna wrote: The votes there are all meh for different reasons.
Mostly because it's out of nowhere.In post 310, sheepsaysmeep wrote: can u briefly talk abt drew too lol
do u townread him or does it just seem meh cuz out of nowhere
In post 247, GuerillaWoo wrote: I am not sure I understand why I am being wagoned, but hello o/ Lookin like wagons are forming and dissipating in the span of a handful of post
In post 248, implosion wrote: Well, you have two votes on you which is nominally a wagon. Do either of the votes on you make you think anything about the people voting you?
this just seems like a direct contradiction to meIn post 249, GuerillaWoo wrote: Nah, not really. They thought I was inactive and wanted to pressure. It's pretty NAI, scum could do it for the town vibes.
I agree with the sheep reasoning. I disagree on the Invisibility reasoning - I don't think that is town indicative.In post 57, implosion wrote: Well I mean, kind of but not really. sheep is town for 40 being the kind of thing town would try to do early and that I think would be a less natural remark for scum to make. Invis is town specifically for wagoning off "gut pingss" being a slightly brazen thing for scum to do. I also kind of want to call the "don't eat wagons" banter townish just for idk, natural banter in thread on page 2.
This is eyebrow raising for me.In post 67, skitter30 wrote: The fact that i had had the same thought abt vizzy
Why can't town try hard?In post 79, Andante wrote:cause it's less than 100 posts in and implosion is trying like super hard, it just screams sk to meIn post 76, Invisibility wrote:how do you distinguish this from town solving?In post 72, Andante wrote: If we have a serial killer, pretty sure it's implosion based on how he's playing, it reads to me as like "hey! tr me!!! look at my effort" and sk not knowing scum team? easy to do this
I agree with thisIn post 103, Cephrir wrote: andante seems a bit like an exaggerated version of andante right now but idk
Generally when a player is gone for 48 hours the mod will send them a prod. After an additional 24 hours the mod will begin to look for a replacement.
Well, considering that you just didn't exist for the first 48 hours, I thought maybe you hadn't confirmed. My bad for assuming though.In post 319, Dunnstral wrote:Generally when a player is gone for 48 hours the mod will send them a prod. After an additional 24 hours the mod will begin to look for a replacement.
So no, I don't think we will need a replacement in this scenario.
If you're town your problem is that you will townread everyone for light banter and giving the bare minimum of content. You are not being skeptical enough.In post 316, Alianna wrote: So we have a problem. One person is sus and there's 2-4 bad guys in the game.