Pokemon Battles 2 - Attack on Giratina [GAME OVER]

[sheepsaysmeep]

VOTE: kittytacky

Nah, he's probably town.

why

[patchwork]

i find it a little strange that they sprang that read on sheep when sheep had four or five posts. i, myself, literally forgot sheep had even posted at all, so i believe that gives squirtle's argument more credibility.

you find it strange that Squirtle made on that argument on Sheep cuz Sheep had so few posts but since you forgot about Sheep it has more credibility?

no bc squirtle's initial post was "vibes are off" or something along those lines... WHERE ARE THE VIBES IM NOT PICKING THEM UP

[patchwork]

You waved a hand at a hugely long exchange, decreed "wifom" and that's it. It discredits what they were trying to do with sheep to read them, as well. If you have more thoughts worth writing, you are expected to give them of your own volition, rather than wait to be asked.

but i'm not discrediting them? my post literally said that i felt it was wifom?

It seems like you think there is a distinction between those things. I don't think that there is. This conversation is not accomplishing anything.

I read this post as calling me confusing, i.e. unreliable. It's possible that was not what you intended to say.

no, i was just saying i was getting confused....

Maybe, or maybe you're backing off because this interaction wasn't going well for you. I don't have perfect knowledge of which of those worlds we live in.

i think you're just misunderstanding me here.

[Ranger]

VOTE: patchwork

VOTE: patchwork

[Invisibility]

i find it a little strange that they sprang that read on sheep when sheep had four or five posts. i, myself, literally forgot sheep had even posted at all, so i believe that gives squirtle's argument more credibility.

you find it strange that Squirtle made on that argument on Sheep cuz Sheep had so few posts but since you forgot about Sheep it has more credibility?

no bc squirtle's initial post was "vibes are off" or something along those lines... WHERE ARE THE VIBES IM NOT PICKING THEM UP

I'm still confused sorry :P what gives Squirtle's argument more credibility?

[Flavor Leaf]

Political positioning is when someone makes reads specifically to take a stake and play and help control a gamestate.

As someone who also makes reads list as town and scum, I can feel the difference when a player is actually reading the gamestate in such a way or if they’re listing to have a better spot in the general gamestate.

The fact they had multiple at the top, and non existent me is fake af.

It makes the people closer to the top happy with Ranger, and the ones kind of in the middle hope to go up.

Ranger started to put me up once I called them out hoping I’d start liking them more.

Their lower tiers are there being held down and likely going to take some flak.

They put me there with little to zero content when they literally just went through a game with me not too long ago where i just posted gifs all day 1.

It was a political placing of myself on the bottom, and multiple people at the top

[patchwork]

I am processing what to make of the surprising tone of patchwork's responses here. I'll let you know when I've arrived at the most righteous conclusion.

wdym surprising tone...

[Ranger]

You have never played with Ranger?

Sheep joined during my break from this site. Was gone from 2017 - 2022.

[Flavor Leaf]

the best part about ranger read lists is knowing what pages lots of stuff happened on and then seeing almost no changes at all when they get to those pages.

It's like asking chatGPT to slightly change a list every page with no rhyme or reason at all

It’s completely political positioning. There’s no merit to some of those reasonings except to put people in certain boxes.

As far as I can see, Ranger hasn't posted any "reasonings" for her reads apart from her read on me. So what are you talking about?

Reasonings for reads don’t matter.

Kind of my point. It’s the specific angling. Reasonings are easy to make up as scum anyways. It’s early game, and they’re doing this thing where they’re corralling the social dynamics of this game with the reads list.

It’s not the fact they’re doing reads list, it’s the how

[patchwork]

i find it a little strange that they sprang that read on sheep when sheep had four or five posts. i, myself, literally forgot sheep had even posted at all, so i believe that gives squirtle's argument more credibility.

you find it strange that Squirtle made on that argument on Sheep cuz Sheep had so few posts but since you forgot about Sheep it has more credibility?

no bc squirtle's initial post was "vibes are off" or something along those lines... WHERE ARE THE VIBES IM NOT PICKING THEM UP

I'm still confused sorry what gives Squirtle's argument more credibility?

squirtle says (this is oversimplified) "sheep just sort of disappeared, i think this is scum-indicative". i

forgot

sheep had even posted, so i think the argument is more fair.

[Chandra Nalaar]

I am processing what to make of the surprising tone of patchwork's responses here. I'll let you know when I've arrived at the most righteous conclusion.

wdym surprising tone...

Reconciliatory, trying to find mutual understanding, slightly hurt. It's not how most players respond to a hard push.

[Ranger]

{Pink Ball, jjh927, Doctor Drew, Chandra Nalaar}
{Metens, sheepsaysmeep}
{Klick, Blue}
{NorwegianboyEE}
{Skygazer, Titus}
{KittyTacky}
{Not_Mafia}
{SirCakez, Firebringer}
{SquirtleSquad}
{Black, Flavor Leaf}
{Magical Girl}
{Invisibility}
{WhemeStar, patchwork}

P14

[Invisibility]

i find it a little strange that they sprang that read on sheep when sheep had four or five posts. i, myself, literally forgot sheep had even posted at all, so i believe that gives squirtle's argument more credibility.

you find it strange that Squirtle made on that argument on Sheep cuz Sheep had so few posts but since you forgot about Sheep it has more credibility?

no bc squirtle's initial post was "vibes are off" or something along those lines... WHERE ARE THE VIBES IM NOT PICKING THEM UP

I'm still confused sorry :P what gives Squirtle's argument more credibility?

squirtle says (this is oversimplified) "sheep just sort of disappeared, i think this is scum-indicative". i

forgot

sheep had even posted, so i think the argument is more fair.

ooooh ok ok

[SquirtleSquad]

Political positioning is when someone makes reads specifically to take a stake and play and help control a gamestate.

As someone who also makes reads list as town and scum, I can feel the difference when a player is actually reading the gamestate in such a way or if they’re listing to have a better spot in the general gamestate.

The fact they had multiple at the top, and non existent me is fake af.

It makes the people closer to the top happy with Ranger, and the ones kind of in the middle hope to go up.

Ranger started to put me up once I called them out hoping I’d start liking them more.

Their lower tiers are there being held down and likely going to take some flak.

They put me there with little to zero content when they literally just went through a game with me not too long ago where i just posted gifs all day 1.

It was a political placing of myself on the bottom, and multiple people at the top

I guess I don't understand why they'd place you at the bottom if they're being political. Are you saying they wouldn't care about what you think about them or what?

[SquirtleSquad]

i find it a little strange that they sprang that read on sheep when sheep had four or five posts. i, myself, literally forgot sheep had even posted at all, so i believe that gives squirtle's argument more credibility.

you find it strange that Squirtle made on that argument on Sheep cuz Sheep had so few posts but since you forgot about Sheep it has more credibility?

no bc squirtle's initial post was "vibes are off" or something along those lines... WHERE ARE THE VIBES IM NOT PICKING THEM UP

I'm still confused sorry what gives Squirtle's argument more credibility?

squirtle says (this is oversimplified) "sheep just sort of disappeared, i think this is scum-indicative". i

forgot

sheep had even posted, so i think the argument is more fair.

ooooh ok ok

this does not even slightly resemble what I said about sheep.

[patchwork]

I am processing what to make of the surprising tone of patchwork's responses here. I'll let you know when I've arrived at the most righteous conclusion.

wdym surprising tone...

Reconciliatory, trying to find mutual understanding, slightly hurt. It's not how most players respond to a hard push.

oh

[Invisibility]

this does not even slightly resemble what I said about sheep.

ooooh it does not

[patchwork]

this does not even slightly resemble what I said about sheep.

wait what did you say then....

[Flavor Leaf]

If we could get some more votes on WhemeStar, that would be great. I would also accept patchwork. Get in on the ground floor of this scum catching opportunity! #girlboss

You have my vote. <3


{Pink Ball, jjh927, Doctor Drew, Chandra Nalaar}
{Metens}
{Skygazer, Titus, sheepsaysmeep}
{Klick}
{Not_Mafia}
{NorwegianboyEE}
{Invisibility, SirCakez, Firebringer}
{Magical Girl}
{SquirtleSquad}
{Blue, Black, Flavor Leaf}
{WhemeStar, patchwork}

P9

{Pink Ball, jjh927, Doctor Drew, Chandra Nalaar}
{Metens, sheepsaysmeep}
{Skygazer, Titus}
{Klick}
{Not_Mafia}
{NorwegianboyEE, Blue}
{SirCakez, Firebringer}
{SquirtleSquad}
{Black, Flavor Leaf}
{Magical Girl}
{Invisibility}
{WhemeStar, patchwork}

P11

I didn’t even post from Page 9 to Page 11, and I happened to move up? This post came after I was coming after them too.

This is scum political positioning.

[Chandra Nalaar]

the best part about ranger read lists is knowing what pages lots of stuff happened on and then seeing almost no changes at all when they get to those pages.

It's like asking chatGPT to slightly change a list every page with no rhyme or reason at all

It’s completely political positioning. There’s no merit to some of those reasonings except to put people in certain boxes.

As far as I can see, Ranger hasn't posted any "reasonings" for her reads apart from her read on me. So what are you talking about?

Reasonings for reads don’t matter.

Kind of my point. It’s the specific angling. Reasonings are easy to make up as scum anyways. It’s early game, and they’re doing this thing where they’re corralling the social dynamics of this game with the reads list.

It’s not the fact they’re doing reads list, it’s the how

I don't see how you can conclude someone's reasons are invalid if you don't know what their reasons are.

I think the things you think are happening are just straight up not happening, but I don't want to pick a fight with you yet, so I won't.

[Ranger]

I’ve made like 2 posts.

Yeah, all bad ones.


{Pink Ball, Doctor Drew, Chandra Nalaar}
{Metens, sheepsaysmeep}
{jjh927}
{Klick, Blue}
{NorwegianboyEE}
{Skygazer, Titus, KittyTacky}
{Not_Mafia}
{SirCakez, Firebringer}
{SquirtleSquad}
{Black}
{Magical Girl, Flavor Leaf}
{Invisibility}
{WhemeStar, patchwork}

P15

[patchwork]

ur argument was about scum attracting attention though... right???

[Flavor Leaf]

Political positioning is when someone makes reads specifically to take a stake and play and help control a gamestate.

As someone who also makes reads list as town and scum, I can feel the difference when a player is actually reading the gamestate in such a way or if they’re listing to have a better spot in the general gamestate.

The fact they had multiple at the top, and non existent me is fake af.

It makes the people closer to the top happy with Ranger, and the ones kind of in the middle hope to go up.

Ranger started to put me up once I called them out hoping I’d start liking them more.

Their lower tiers are there being held down and likely going to take some flak.

They put me there with little to zero content when they literally just went through a game with me not too long ago where i just posted gifs all day 1.

It was a political placing of myself on the bottom, and multiple people at the top

I guess I don't understand why they'd place you at the bottom if they're being political. Are you saying they wouldn't care about what you think about them or what?

Because I wasn’t around and it seemed free and like it wouldn’t mess with the gamestate that much.

[SquirtleSquad]

this does not even slightly resemble what I said about sheep.

wait what did you say then....

specifically I did not like sheeps entrance because I thought it was trying to find jokey places to be present in the thread. The whole argument with Klick was about whether or not that was something scum tend to do or not so I have a hard time seeing how you could have actually read the conversation between me and klick without picking up on that.

[SquirtleSquad]

At no point was my point about activity on not being present in the thread.