In post 1872, patchwork wrote:
In post 1757, Blue. wrote:
What am I missing?
You say I "didn't say anything" and did not give an explanation for my read. That's taking issue with my rhetoric. But why is not elaborating scummy?
You accused me of "looking for something to push" - that's a direct quote. I asked why I would be targeting Black in this fashion if that was the case. What point am I missing?
In your own words, you have said that I was "looking for something to push" but also had "no explanation" - how do these go together? Doesn't pushing someone necessarily require explanation if you hope to be persuasive? These ideas, to me, seem to be at odds with one another.
These are all asking you to simply clarify your own thought process, and in response you have just repeated the same banal reasoning toward me. I don't think what I am asking is unreasonable. You are accusing me of something, and I am asking you to explain why you think it is scummy.
OH okay thanks for elaborating
1 - i think it's weird because usually scum will try to find a townie to push and it aligns with what i sort of try to do- lay the grounds for a somewhat weak push. it's weirder because when you were voting black you didn't really contest what she was saying? you just went, oh, you're grandstanding, oh, this is out of bad faith, but never explained why. it just makes me a little more skeptical of your motivation
2 - your questions were kind of missing my point in hand because i didn't think they were responding to what i was tyring to say
3 - they do go together- having no explanation is a hyperbole, sorry. i was just trying to show that from my point of view, your defense on cakez was just generally kind of mediocre and pushing black with little to no reasoning didnt vibe right w me.
sorry for teh short responses, 6am, mafia addiction, etc
"usually scum will try to find a townie to push" - okay, and town will usually try to find scum. What makes, in your estimation, my push on Black more likely to be a scum motivated one than a town motivated one? You don't trust the fact that I didn't explain enough for you - is that a scumtell?
You argue that I was missing your point - how could I possibly be doing that when I was
directly quoting you
and trying to get you to explain? Was I somehow not responding to you when I did that? Or are you just being evasive?
Literally two points above this you said I never explained my push, and now you claim it's hyperbole. You can't seem to stick to a single narrative, you twist and turn with every new post. You can claim you simply didn't like my arguments, but you still claimed I was "looking for something to push". You haven't actually explained how that goes along with not having an explanation, you just said "uhh yeah they do". That's not an answer.
I find your reasoning to be nonsensical. You've mostly said the same thing over and over, but in a more word salad way. It doesn't feel like you actually care about or are trying to understand my thinking, and are just making up excuses to attack me.
