In post 142, xofelf wrote:
Either the gimmick has grown on me, or I'm just fluent in them from way too many Survivor games. I kinda like what the Bread is laying down, it's followable. Idk if I agree with any of the assertions so far, but there's nothing too outrageous there.
Unvote
let me stare at it, idk how to explain it this is hard
In post 318, hellbooks wrote:
i think vp baltar isnt acting unlike the game we were in where he was scum but i choose to believe hes not scum, because we're friends. and also theres no way you roll scum again i mean comme on what are the odds of that. dont answer that. put away your math book tris
Yes what are the chances...
YOUR AD HERE
Too busy with work to play mafia right now but I shall return some day!
In post 142, xofelf wrote:
Either the gimmick has grown on me, or I'm just fluent in them from way too many Survivor games. I kinda like what the Bread is laying down, it's followable. Idk if I agree with any of the assertions so far, but there's nothing too outrageous there.
Unvote
let me stare at it, idk how to explain it this is hard
I think it's something tonal + the non-stanceyness (not the act of upvoting)
or like, this is a complete rvs vote. I looked just now it was post 35, a joke about the flavor. why are you explaining it like that
"either the gimmick has grown on me.. " why are you legit explaining removing ur rvs vote, gut bad
"I like what he's laying down, it's followable"
weird
"Idk if I agree with any of the assertions, but there's nothing outrageous"
weird
In post 332, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
I think it's something tonal + the non-stanceyness (not the act of upvoting)
or like, this is a complete rvs vote. I looked just now it was post 35, a joke about the flavor. why are you explaining it like that
"either the gimmick has grown on me.. " why are you legit explaining removing ur rvs vote, gut bad
"I like what he's laying down, it's followable"
weird
"Idk if I agree with any of the assertions, but there's nothing outrageous"
weird
has it occurred to you that your read on that post could be bad?
In post 332, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
I think it's something tonal + the non-stanceyness (not the act of upvoting)
or like, this is a complete rvs vote. I looked just now it was post 35, a joke about the flavor. why are you explaining it like that
"either the gimmick has grown on me.. " why are you legit explaining removing ur rvs vote, gut bad
"I like what he's laying down, it's followable"
weird
"Idk if I agree with any of the assertions, but there's nothing outrageous"
weird
has it occurred to you that your read on that post could be bad?
it could be incorrect but I think my general vibe-reading quality like this is immaculate
my take on this conversation is that you are full of shit and these are the kind of lengths you have to go to to justify your stance.
I actually have a really hard time seeing how it.
First I though it likely isn't impossible for that xof post to be made by a wolf but I think it's much more likely that that is a genuine xofelf reaction
then I read garlic's breads posts up to that point and xof unvote post makes significantly more sense and makes me think more so that this is something that xofelf just thinks.
I think your approach of looking at the post and trying to see how you can attack it as opposed to actually looking at the events that happened to see if such a stance would make sense to have or whatnot just ping wolf to me > town who wants to actually be right on a read
In post 344, Alisae wrote:
I actually have a really hard time seeing how it.
I am stoned I did not finish this sentence.
I have a really hard time seeing how this is town having a read as opposed to a wolf making up their stance on the spot
In post 337, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
I think overall too xofelf might be my main scumread just for like general non-stance-ness
this pings me. Didn't you play with xof in election?
I was actually thinking abt like I remember them p immediately doing like a “vibes” read for each player in whichever game I played with them and I was gonna ask them to do that gun-to-head for this game because that feels really different to the approach right now
I just don’t rly get the post’s thought that ur talking abt in the first place which is why the post is textbook wolfy to me
If it was like, “I now think garlic is villagery so I will unvote” or like “my first vote was for wolfpings but now I’m unvoting” I see things totally different but the post is “he has content so I’m unvoting” and said in a slightly wolfy way
And it feels like ur painting the post to be like not the last one which is just a view of fact
YOUR AD HERE
