In post 1449, Ausuka wrote:
Maybe like 50/50? She's certainly suspicious and I think is considerably >rand scum but it's hard to be sure about anything on d1 and people who don't make sense flip town sometimes
Ok then how about we flip Cook for being obvscum and go solve the game from there?
In post 1449, Ausuka wrote:
Maybe like 50/50? She's certainly suspicious and I think is considerably >rand scum but it's hard to be sure about anything on d1 and people who don't make sense flip town sometimes
Ok then how about we flip Cook for being obvscum and go solve the game from there?
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
I wonder if MH coached Italiano at all or if that was just rock solid scum play start to finish.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I don’t feel like this specific town could have beaten this scum strategy played as strongly as it was.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I'm frustrated with myself that I can't get any sort of read on you.
Is it possible Cook would be our only investigative role? I personally don't think we should vote for her because it might be really hard to find scum this game.
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
Ausuka meant exactly that. Ausuka is operating from a town mentality, so only considers a world where the vig is hunting scum
In post 1458, KatyKimFanClub wrote:
Is it possible Cook would be our only investigative role? I personally don't think we should vote for her because it might be really hard to find scum this game.
If she is the only investigative town will probably have significant power even if it's a goon game. If she's a scum rolecop she's forced to reveal what scum know from her role, unless they try a tricky gambit.
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
Ausuka meant exactly that. Ausuka is operating from a town mentality, so only considers a world where the vig is hunting scum
No what I meant was if vig can’t kill bulletproof then what does being scum have to do with anything. So the way I read it and interpreted it was “the vig would work if the bp was town” which is what I get out of “we can’t ask vig to cook cook because she could be mafia” almost like it would make a difference if the target was town.
Am I making sense or no?
I wonder if MH coached Italiano at all or if that was just rock solid scum play start to finish.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I don’t feel like this specific town could have beaten this scum strategy played as strongly as it was.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I'm frustrated with myself that I can't get any sort of read on you.
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
Ausuka meant exactly that. Ausuka is operating from a town mentality, so only considers a world where the vig is hunting scum
No what I meant was if vig can’t kill bulletproof then what does being scum have to do with anything. So the way I read it and interpreted it was “the vig would work if the bp was town” which is what I get out of “we can’t ask vig to cook cook because she could be mafia” almost like it would make a difference if the target was town.
Am I making sense or no?
No, to this one Ausuka does. She's saying that, if this game had a vig, then if this vig decided to sort cook and the claim is scum then it's a wasted shot and only the bp part is confirmed. On consideration this one understands your point but ultimately feels Ausuka was being sincere.
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
Ausuka meant exactly that. Ausuka is operating from a town mentality, so only considers a world where the vig is hunting scum
No what I meant was if vig can’t kill bulletproof then what does being scum have to do with anything. So the way I read it and interpreted it was “the vig would work if the bp was town” which is what I get out of “we can’t ask vig to cook cook because she could be mafia” almost like it would make a difference if the target was town.
Am I making sense or no?
No, to this one Ausuka does. She's saying that, if this game had a vig, then if this vig decided to sort cook and the claim is scum then it's a wasted shot and only the bp part is confirmed. On consideration this one understands your point but ultimately feels Ausuka was being sincere.
Not even confirmed perhaps depending on bunyips and blockers and the like
In post 1464, Asri Teroka wrote:
This one has never played with happy but has played with T3, just so you know.
Lol so how do you know he’ll be sorted later? Anyway, if you show me why you feel it’s T3 in a couple sentences or something I’ll see if it makes sense and possibly compromise there. I’m at work and posting on phone so can’t really go back an iso at the moment.
I wonder if MH coached Italiano at all or if that was just rock solid scum play start to finish.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I don’t feel like this specific town could have beaten this scum strategy played as strongly as it was.
- MUSHSHAGANA
I'm frustrated with myself that I can't get any sort of read on you.
In post 1390, Ausuka wrote:
Unfortunately we can't just ask vig to cook cook because she might be a mafia bp shrug
Umm vig can’t kill bulletproof regardless of alignment right so how does “we can’t ask vig to kill cook because she might be a mafia bp” make sense, unless you misspoke.
If there's a vig cook is probably scum, so it would be nice and simple if they could just shoot her, but they can't because bulletproof.
I'm curious what you're getting at here. Like, is there some kind of scum motivation to phrasing things this way?
In post 1464, Asri Teroka wrote:
This one has never played with happy but has played with T3, just so you know.
Lol so how do you know he’ll be sorted later? Anyway, if you show me why you feel it’s T3 in a couple sentences or something I’ll see if it makes sense and possibly compromise there. I’m at work and posting on phone so can’t really go back an iso at the moment.
Fair, this one's logging off,
Happy will be easy to read, they really will be.
This one has some prior statements regarding T3, address them if you desire