I think one of the things that pinged me about mr fire is red is that his post about people's alignments felt like it was hedging in a way that was kinda self conscious. Like you're giving reads on page 5 I feel like town knows that's ridiculous and just sort of says shit but fires is all hedgy. Shea COULD be town. Sheep COULD not be.
And also like kinda vaguely well poisony for somewhat similar reasons "hellbooks i think may have thought up most of these posts before she even got her role pm" etc.
It's kind of similar to the posting in the last game and feels sorta distinct from his town game that I've observed in that regard.
In post 127, Thestatusquo wrote:
I think one of the things that pinged me about mr fire is red is that his post about people's alignments felt like it was hedging in a way that was kinda self conscious. Like you're giving reads on page 5 I feel like town knows that's ridiculous and just sort of says shit but fires is all hedgy. Shea COULD be town. Sheep COULD not be.
And also like kinda vaguely well poisony for somewhat similar reasons "hellbooks i think may have thought up most of these posts before she even got her role pm" etc.
It's kind of similar to the posting in the last game and feels sorta distinct from his town game that I've observed in that regard.
i always hedge and im always self conscious
my page 5 reads are also better than my page 100 reads tbh so i don't really agree that making them is ridiculous
the hellbooks comment was to say that her posting was probably not alignment readable to me so far
In post 122, fireisredsir wrote:
last coalition i didn't make it into the coalition and it was kinda lonely and dark and cold out there
fire if neither of us make it into the coalition i am going to literally generate such an overflowing excess of private inside jokes that all the coalition folks are gonna be sit there in silence and be like "oh..... turns out this wasnt the fun car." they're all gonna be too awks to pass the aux. and i bet they wont even be playing dethy in there.
In post 118, tris wrote:
so far i just have the tiny isis townread im keeping in a jar.
why to me her posts are kind of alarming but its a little bit hard for me to say because most of the times I've observed her town game its been through the lens of her playing on some alt gimmick account. I'm used to a more solving mindset early on even when its like idk filtered through the lens of her saying things like "the moon whispers to the trees that shea could be fearing the evils ones" or w/e
In post 122, fireisredsir wrote:
last coalition i didn't make it into the coalition and it was kinda lonely and dark and cold out there
fire if neither of us make it into the coalition i am going to literally generate such an overflowing excess of private inside jokes that all the coalition folks are gonna be sit there in silence and be like "oh..... turns out this wasnt the fun car." they're all gonna be too awks to pass the aux. and i bet they wont even be playing dethy in there.
i really hope you're mafia so that it is actually a good idea for people to exclude us from the coalition bc now im excited to not be in it
I think isis is extremely capable of making that post as scum and it worries me that tris doesn't think she is and it double worries me that you're chiming in to support that side of the argument.
i don't think that isis thinks along very many similar lines to you but i did actually also slightly side eye at that post so im not really arguing against you
In post 241, Thestatusquo wrote:
posting a thread emoji and then later going back to be like "oh man i tipped my hand i should have gathered more ammo and then hit em with an even more epic thread emoji" is something i would extremely extremely say as scum to perform the ability to post fire thread emojis btw
tacking these two posts up on the bulletin board and connecting them with a
i think that isis could talk about how she's scum as scum and you could talk about how you're scum as scum but the two of you would do it in different ways and for very different reasons
what if we all decide on a coalition as usual but don't actually submit it, and then we let the people in the coalition vote amongst themselves for one player who they think shouldn't be in the coalition, and one they think should be, and we make the swap. or alternatively they vote for no swap
i think this idea that i spent 30 seconds thinking about is optimal, actually
except it's better if the mafia don't know about it. so don't tell them we're doing it until it happens and then it'll be this big surprise and we'll catch them because they'll be the people going "huh???"
In post 84, Thestatusquo wrote:
ok so my gut reads are that hellbooks and sheep are town and skitter could be scum and I will refuse to deviate from those for the remainder of the game.
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
