Micro 1087 | It's normal | It's over!

[medeia]

Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof

Roleblocker
Ascetic

Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me

uh, well i not good at this, but! i am here

so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,

i kinda think the roleblocker would probably be something else if this were the case? like maybe 1-shot strongman or a rolecop or something

just seems like so many potential false positives and! hard for mafias to interact with both the jailkeeper and bulletproof

but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns

no database for micro normals because they're usually not played in the normal queue +/

Being jailed wouldn't you not get any result if you tried using an investigative PR? You would just get "No Result," correct?

i believe this is true of most investigative prs but

checker is simply checking to see whether it gets a result or no result however

like ‘result’ = successful, ‘no result’ = not successful

and i would get an identical not successful regardless of why the check failed i believe

...

...

Could you share a paraphrased role PM on this?

i mean,

checks someone to see whether my action was successful

can also link the wiki if you want or you can ask the mod

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Checker

[Random Nurse]

Is
Jk
Checker
Bulletproof

Roleblocker
Ascetic

Balanced?
Plz someone who is good at this help me

uh, well i not good at this, but! i am here

so i potentially get false positives from jailkeeper and roleblocker, but true positive from ascetic,

i kinda think the roleblocker would probably be something else if this were the case? like maybe 1-shot strongman or a rolecop or something

just seems like so many potential false positives and! hard for mafias to interact with both the jailkeeper and bulletproof

but i don't actually know how often designers try to make the mafia powers line up with the towns

no database for micro normals because they're usually not played in the normal queue +/

Being jailed wouldn't you not get any result if you tried using an investigative PR? You would just get "No Result," correct?

i believe this is true of most investigative prs but

checker is simply checking to see whether it gets a result or no result however

like ‘result’ = successful, ‘no result’ = not successful

and i would get an identical not successful regardless of why the check failed i believe

...

...

Could you share a paraphrased role PM on this?

i mean,

checks someone to see whether my action was successful

can also link the wiki if you want or you can ask the mod

I don't think the mod would offer one considering this is a Closed setup.

Could you link me the wiki, please?

[Random Nurse]

Nvm, just saw it above.

[skitter30]

prevents a nightkill tonight then it confirms random nurse

mm, actually could still do the no nightkill thing towards this end i guess, sigh

nevermind

How do u feel abt voting pooky

[skitter30]

I probably don't vote in the prs today

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

im shocked skitter wants to flip me over the guilty

shocked

[Random Nurse]

im shocked skitter wants to flip me over the guilty

shocked

The guilty?

Which one is that?

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

:eyeroll:

[skitter30]

It's a soft guilty and i'm not sure i believe it's actually a guilty

[Random Nurse]

It's a soft guilty and i'm not sure i believe it's actually a guilty

Skitter, does he mean me?

[Random Nurse]

I'd be fine warming my hands on a Pooky bonfire.

I'll even bring the marshmallows.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

im not gonna waste time convincing people a guilty is a guilty

[Random Nurse]

im not gonna waste time convincing people a guilty is a guilty

That's fine you'll spend that time cooking instead.

[skitter30]

It's a soft guilty and i'm not sure i believe it's actually a guilty

Skitter, does he mean me?

Yes

[skitter30]

im not gonna waste time convincing people a guilty is a guilty

Convince me if you want to lim him

[Random Nurse]

It's a soft guilty and i'm not sure i believe it's actually a guilty

Skitter, does he mean me?

Yes

OK yeah let's burn him.

[sheepsaysmeep]

I probably don't vote in the prs today

I feel like we should because I think it's unlikely all three pr's are real that's just a weird 9p setup

[sheepsaysmeep]

and I sorta believe nurse rn lmao which kinda means ij just wanna vote chicago I guess

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

im not gonna waste time convincing people a guilty is a guilty

That's fine you'll spend that time cooking instead.

ok i dont care

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

like its p clear balance wise to me that you dont put a town checker and a town jailkeeper in a micro cuz false positives are stupid and unbalanced.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

but i guess people believe anything nowadays so whatever

[sheepsaysmeep]

If town jailkeeper in 9p is nearly balanced then a checker could just serve as like an altogether red-herring non vt lmao idk I’ve never encountered one of these

[sheepsaysmeep]

Pooky do u agree there’s almost def one wolf in Chicago/nurse

Or if nurse flips villa then Chicago still could be town

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

yea i think there should be at least one wolf because Jk + bulletproof is terrible setup design

thats like an extra false positive

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

like if this setup really has a town checker bulletproof and a jk

it would be designed as a giant middle finger to the town

because thats two different false positives and p much no help for the town to figure out anything