mystery box of silver 15: i'm killing hostages (negotiated)

[Dannflor]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

[BlueSnakelet]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

[Doctor Drew]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

Well this is terrible.

Why so certain they will be killed by Schadd?

[MUSHSHAGANA]

Yeah, have to agree there. It's one thing when it's loudly scummy slots, but if schadd_ is down to the lurkers, either all of town is obving or we got a Matt Olson situation going on and town's in a real bad spot.

[BlueSnakelet]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

Well this is terrible.

Why so certain they will be killed by Schadd?

I'm not. If he is really scum, then he wont be.killed by Schadd.

[Doctor Drew]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

Well this is terrible.

Why so certain they will be killed by Schadd?

I'm not. If he is really scum, then he wont be.killed by Schadd.

Uh....wut

[Dannflor]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

I mean, for anyone

Are any of the wagons enticing to you? You haven't said anything about ofrhz I don't think

[DkKoba]

alright this is where i reveal that schadd did indeed give me a PR that lets me for 1 series decrease Tommy Edman's ability to bat. Not sure about the legality of all this, but you're welcome.

[BlueSnakelet]

is there a reason you aren't voting right now, blue

You mean, for Happy? He's barely in the game.

If he continues not saying anything, he'll just get executed as a hostage. If he doesn't die, then I'll have a real reason to vote for him.

I mean, for anyone

Are any of the wagons enticing to you? You haven't said anything about ofrhz I don't think

I haven't payed any attention to ofrhz so far.

[MUSHSHAGANA]

alright this is where i reveal that schadd did indeed give me a PR that lets me for 1 series decrease Tommy Edman's ability to bat. Not sure about the legality of all this, but you're welcome.

The man already can't bat! That's too cruel for words, schadd_. I'm disgusted.

[Doctor Drew]

alright this is where i reveal that schadd did indeed give me a PR that lets me for 1 series decrease Tommy Edman's ability to bat. Not sure about the legality of all this, but you're welcome.

Well, I have an ability send steroids to Edman anytime I want.

So....you want to go first?

[iamveryhappy]

Oh no! I might get killed as a hostage! Obligatory shitpost coming up.
hello
Bluesnakelet
what do ya want from me

[BlueSnakelet]

Ok, I paid attention to ofrhz. Mostly the things It's Highness pointed out in #472.

I read Ranger and ofrhz combined ISOs. From #15 to #91 it's all Ranger (including her readlists). From #97 to #112 it's all ofrhz talking about things other than Ranger. The next post from either of them is ofrhz's "serious" vote on Ranger, which he later explains was because of Ranger's readlists.

I agree, this development makes 0 sense. ofrhz voted without a reason, and then invented a reason when questioned.

VOTE: ofrhz

[BlueSnakelet]

Oh no! I might get killed as a hostage! Obligatory shitpost coming up.
hello
Bluesnakelet
what do ya want from me

Well... For starters, you may coment on the Koba VS Ranger dabate or it's immediate fallout. That'd put you up to speed.

[Skygazer]

well at least someone on the cardinals can hit a home run

[Skygazer]

says me, a person that can hit zero home runs

[HighPrincessErinys]

says me, a person that can hit zero home runs

can you hit a hole in one tho

[BlueSnakelet]

How does one watch the game. Is it live streamed on the internet? If it's only on television, then I'm out of luck.

[Skygazer]

i had the espn play by play in a tiny lil window on my computer screen. for the actual game you probably need like a tv or espn subscription or a willingness to get nasty letters from your isp

[HighPrincessErinys]

This one honestly thinks it's willing to join team Sus On Pooky, atleast for now. This one has a few reasons, mostly minor ones adding up, but it has a BIG one that it will not be elaborating on at this time. Vote is staying where it is for now though.

[MUSHSHAGANA]

To be clear about my position on Pooky, I'm not married to my townread there. I'm willing to throw him to the fire. It's waaaaay too early to be making hard townreads. Basically the only player I wouldn't ritually sacrifice if it came down to it right this second is HPE, and that's more of a "let's see what someone whose brain makes sense to me sees" thing. I like having a window into the rest of the player list in the early game.

It's more that I think Koba's reasoning on Pooky is crap and the way it was presented to us made Orphee especially spiteful about it and I wasn't a fan either. Just a "No, actually, just out of pure spite" response, rather than a stubborn willingness to defend Pooky to the death.

[HighPrincessErinys]

It's more that I think Koba's reasoning on Pooky is crap and the way it was presented to us made Orphee especially spiteful about it and I wasn't a fan either. Just a "No, actually, just out of pure spite" response, rather than a stubborn willingness to defend Pooky to the death.

Can you break down what Koba said about Pooky exactly for this one because it doesn't have the time to untangle that whole mess.

[MUSHSHAGANA]

It was presented pretty poorly, but seems to be entirely down to… weak, weak meta. “Pooky does this as scum and not as town, except sometimes.” That’s a high level executive summary, and it says very little because very little was said of substance. “Pooky isn’t solving/hunting”, specifically, is the only point I picked out of the meta argument.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

i dont really care i'm even willing to get flipped first this game if I get a commitment from the pl to deadsheep me on my kill list

[HighPrincessErinys]

Yeah this one can agree with a lack of (genuine) solving from Pooky. The main thing it can elaborate on that's worth anything is that some of his posts felt very opportunistic during the thing with me/Ranger/Koba, alongside some really minor meta shit like "wow Pooky is posting very frequently compared to these other random games" but that's almost certainly NAI, but it still stands out just a little. Pooky certainly seems to be a consistent sillyposter in games, though, so it's hard to get a read on em even with what minor meta this one looked at.