In post 255, usesPython wrote:
Our experience with Snivy has him making weird reads, but his actual scumtell is when those reads like just don't go anywhere. Like in Weird Dreams we were consensus town d1, he genuinely scumread us, but like he didn't really care to get us limmed if that makes sense? Like there was no worry about us hard "deepwolfing", especially when he claimed 3-shot alignment cop but also didn't even check us n1
In post 259, usesPython wrote:
Yeah that's our point. We were basically unlimmable from a dayplay perspective whereas Titus could have
maybe
been limmable with sheep and I not TRing her, yet you copped her over us because you didn't
really
care about deepwolves as cult
"scum!Snivy does a thing [which he isn't doing here], look at <game> of cult!Snivy"
"I didn't do the thing in <game>, because reasons"
"Yes you did"
What is this. Am I just reading it wrong? Why would Snivy contest a meta that would paint him as not scum
You're reading it wrong, cult!Snivy scumread us (literally completely consensus town outside of Snivy) and copped Titus (Mostly consensus town but had doubters) who I don't even remember if he scumread at like any point during the day
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
Like I think it was tongue in cheek (Didn't check us cause he copped Titus and he couldn't check us both at the same time) but the meta read still holds
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
're saying, what I don't get is the point of ccs posting 257. Which I understand does actually help your point, but it does look like it was trying to be a retort to 255 (while failing to be so); but really only ccs can ponder on that I suppose
In post 273, biancospino wrote:
"scum!Snivy does a thing [which he isn't doing here], look at <game> of cult!Snivy"
"I didn't do the thing in <game>, because reasons"
"Yes you did"
What is this. Am I just reading it wrong? Why would Snivy contest a meta that would paint him as not scum
im so good at mafia that i need to show i could possibly be scum in a setting where im obvtown
(also python even in a town!snivy case there i might not have copped you because of my inability to push, but the no check was not a possibility)
In post 218, heipizhu4 wrote:
Not sure about python, if python enter this game using an alt account, I'd probably townlean them, but 70 makes me hesitate.
In post 254, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
1. she voted for you initially in rvs, and in my recollection she has not elaborated her read on you nor was it ever obvious that she was trying to sort you. and then later she says you had a sizable chance of being scum?
2. she votes for my slot insinuating that alianna's mention of a serial killer after my replace in. she's apparently confident enough of this read to park it. it's a very convenient way to avoid dealing with the game as scum and bank your vote on a modpost.
i elaborated on the first part
also im literally not parked on your slot, i switched to aureal
yes i saw your note about std being fickle with their voting. i just don't believe that you believe it because you then switched your vote on me just because your scumread didn't care?
it also wasn't until you were called out on it that you pivoted to the slot (aureal) your other scumread is voting. (me)
it makes me hard to think there's an actual train of thought when there isn't consistency in how you play. especially because i think the votes are opportunistic. but i do understand that you can just be like this as a person
In post 265, usesPython wrote:
ngl we wouldn't mind a UNOwen wagon at some point just to get some more from the slot but at this point we're staying parked on Aureal until she towntells
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
-furtiveglance
In post 218, heipizhu4 wrote:
Not sure about python, if python enter this game using an alt account, I'd probably townlean them, but 70 makes me hesitate.
In post 917, usesPython wrote:
Like wtf is even the point of quoting a question that's not even for you just to call us an idiot, what the hell's your problem
-A
In post 918, Doctor Drew wrote:
Post Edit: Came off a bit meaner then I meant it, I mean that I get what you are doing as scum, but other scum would keep you alive since you are also misguided(unless this by design?) thinking you have caught scum(me).
It also boggles my mind that this all started because Bulge didn't really comment on me, and somehow that makes me look scummier then them lol.
Pre Edit: Again sorry, wasn't trying to insult you, just your play.
And on phone, didn't feel like editing down the post.
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
The only +town thing about our reads and cases is that they get us townread, people sheeping us tends to cause either town losses or town winning in spite of our play
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 290, usesPython wrote:
Oh Snivy's the first serious wagon that we didn't scumcase today we should probably sheep that at some point
what happened to sk at worst
Also like both Drew and you have said our towncase of you is wrong here so idk why you're so surprised that we're willing to sheep other people when our read was built on faulty premises
In post 273, biancospino wrote:
"scum!Snivy does a thing [which he isn't doing here], look at <game> of cult!Snivy"
"I didn't do the thing in <game>, because reasons"
"Yes you did"
What is this. Am I just reading it wrong? Why would Snivy contest a meta that would paint him as not scum
im so good at mafia that i need to show i could possibly be scum in a setting where im obvtown
(also python even in a town!snivy case there i might not have copped you because of my inability to push, but the no check was not a possibility)
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 295, usesPython wrote:
Also like both Drew and you have said our towncase of you is wrong here so idk why you're so surprised that we're willing to sheep other people when our read was built on faulty premises
In post 273, biancospino wrote:
"scum!Snivy does a thing [which he isn't doing here], look at <game> of cult!Snivy"
"I didn't do the thing in <game>, because reasons"
"Yes you did"
What is this. Am I just reading it wrong? Why would Snivy contest a meta that would paint him as not scum
im so good at mafia that i need to show i could possibly be scum in a setting where im obvtown
(also python even in a town!snivy case there i might not have copped you because of my inability to push, but the no check was not a possibility)
that part was a joke, i kinda forgot that by saying why i had a no check i was proving myself scum
In post 296, camelCasedSnivy wrote:
that part was a joke, i kinda forgot that by saying why i had a no check i was proving myself scum
That took us like 5 minutes trying to figure out what you just said so we're just gonna go back to wagoning Aureal before our brain spontaneously combusts
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
"Yeah after a point it felt like Aureal was the only one talking sense despite being a goose so I just followed."
