In post 1146, Civil Scum wrote:
I still don’t understand why it’s harder to fake claim JK than BG or Cop.
In post 1141, bob3141 wrote:
In post 1125, iamveryhappy wrote:
In post 1123, Civil Scum wrote:
If you were one of the top elimination targets in D-1 as a scum, would you ever consider claiming JK and claim a strong read on a townie based on a lack of vigilantes, such that you would be in essence fishing for two counter claims at once?
Only if I were one.
jk is not an easy role to fakeclaim, bear that in mind
Yep easier for scum just to claim something like doc/bg, so if naerys was scum it would far more likely that it would be a true claim. And if the player was fishing for roles before their flip then there are better claims too. So either naerys is scum 2 shot jk or rookie town 2 shot jk
So let me get this straight, JK can also be a scum role, therefore Naerys might have “truly” claimed complex JK. This means she might have done so without realizing that it ran counter to her assumption about vigilantes.
That’s interesting and might mean that I need to adjust my scum pool for PC-Naerys-X since the third scum no longer need be a mastermind. I think I got on that idea based on how newbie the earlyness of the claim seemed coupled with someone saying they thought the complex modifier running counter to her vigilante assumption was further evidence of her newbie-ness.
being a jailkeeper fakeclaim is 100% harder than being a cop/doc/bg fakeclaim
now
jk does both doc and rb
so basically you are fucked when a investigative pr claims and tells you to rb them to test if you are real, you get turboed if
1. they die
2. they don't get a NO RESULT (action failed)
while cop is easier because you can pull NOT MAFIA/MAFIA inspects out of your ass
doc=I don't care I'm literally going to put I docced this n1 docced that n2 and because doc doesn't know if action failed it's p easy to fakeclaim
tbh I have never seen a mafia jk in my mafia career, not even in closed setups