Sorry , post contains 0 mafia solving and all excuses , disregarded.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Cook is obvious town and your confbias is getting on my nerves too.In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
You KNOW why I refuse to interact with a role like thisIn post 2994, Bingle wrote:How is giving you a random neg utility modifer for accountability “feeding” a role?In post 2980, DkKoba wrote:No I don't want to feed this roleIn post 2975, Cook wrote: i'm fine with bingle's plan for my night action
can't see how it could make things worse for koba
koba are you okay with it
Like how can you type so much and have not a single take on anyone's alignment in here. This is all defensive posting.In post 2989, Aureal wrote: Messages are less accountable in the case of Amway having been spread secretly. And I have little hope that we're going to have things all wrapped up nicely enough to consider that possibility minimized.
Imagine I am scum with Ircher, who will likely end day with neighborhoods available still and no ability to message if we have Sky nab a second recruit rather than him doing it. What's to stop him from hitting a scum partner with Amway secretly then I get a roleblock and he sends a message supposedly from me?
Using messages instead of neighborhoods is pointless and flawed because as long as we're all agreed for now not to spread Amway past the point of Theta getting a neighborhood action, it would take bad faith on both parties' ends for it to be spread through a night action neighborhood. And if there's bad faith on both sides, they can just be lying and saying it was just a message.
A neighborhood is a superior choice because it gives easy feedback to both parties and it can't possibly have originated from somewhere else. It has potential fringe benefits of possibly helping detect that Amway has been spread to an unexpected slot that a message doesn't.
for one, i'm scum, apparentlyIn post 3004, DkKoba wrote:Like how can you type so much and have not a single take on anyone's alignment in here. This is all defensive posting.In post 2989, Aureal wrote: Messages are less accountable in the case of Amway having been spread secretly. And I have little hope that we're going to have things all wrapped up nicely enough to consider that possibility minimized.
Imagine I am scum with Ircher, who will likely end day with neighborhoods available still and no ability to message if we have Sky nab a second recruit rather than him doing it. What's to stop him from hitting a scum partner with Amway secretly then I get a roleblock and he sends a message supposedly from me?
Using messages instead of neighborhoods is pointless and flawed because as long as we're all agreed for now not to spread Amway past the point of Theta getting a neighborhood action, it would take bad faith on both parties' ends for it to be spread through a night action neighborhood. And if there's bad faith on both sides, they can just be lying and saying it was just a message.
A neighborhood is a superior choice because it gives easy feedback to both parties and it can't possibly have originated from somewhere else. It has potential fringe benefits of possibly helping detect that Amway has been spread to an unexpected slot that a message doesn't.
Can someone tell me 5 reads that aureal has
someone get dayvigged or delete all the votes or something lmaoIn post 3007, Cook wrote: oh something else... if we can produce 32 more pages in the next 5real-lifedays we can get into the top 8 longest days onsite
Your refusal to answer the question is noted.In post 3000, DkKoba wrote:Sorry , post contains 0 mafia solving and all excuses , disregarded.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Sort the damn game or die
You've yet to explain how Cook is obvious town whereas I have explained why Cook is scum. Maybe you should check your own confirmation bias.In post 3001, DkKoba wrote:Cook is obvious town and your confbias is getting on my nerves too.In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Yeah your confbias "case" did 0 to convince me and you're just so far up your tunnel its pointless to convince you.In post 3010, Ircher wrote:You've yet to explain how Cook is obvious town whereas I have explained why Cook is scum. Maybe you should check your own confirmation bias.In post 3001, DkKoba wrote:Cook is obvious town and your confbias is getting on my nerves too.In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Klick would be the apathy elimination. Klick could flip town, or Klick could flip scum, but it would provide far less information than eliminating Cook since most of the case comes down to "Random Nurse decided not to participate in this game." The meta argument is mostly an extension of that. I'd rather flip Cook here since the odds of scum are at least as good as Klick, but it would also be more informative given the number of non-activity related stances taken there.In post 2998, Meuh wrote:Let's kill Klick? Please?In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
ok LackReads whatever u sayIn post 3009, Aureal wrote:Your refusal to answer the question is noted.In post 3000, DkKoba wrote:Sorry , post contains 0 mafia solving and all excuses , disregarded.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Sort the damn game or die
Actually this is scummy and reminded me I had u in PoE roflIn post 3012, Ircher wrote:Klick would be the apathy elimination. Klick could flip town, or Klick could flip scum, but it would provide far less information than eliminating Cook since most of the case comes down to "Random Nurse decided not to participate in this game." The meta argument is mostly an extension of that. I'd rather flip Cook here since the odds of scum are at least as good as Klick, but it would also be more informative given the number of non-activity related stances taken there.In post 2998, Meuh wrote:Let's kill Klick? Please?In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Look at the actual content RN's posted. It's not just not playing the game. Look at the tone, look at the appeals, look at the things he spents his time on, look at the way he interacts with others, look at his ideas. He's just scum. Maybe it's an apathy lim to you because you haven't gotten anything meaningful from that ISO (or because you're not actually trying to read him) but there is more than enough there to give me a pretty good feeling that he's just scum.In post 3012, Ircher wrote:Klick would be the apathy elimination. Klick could flip town, or Klick could flip scum, but it would provide far less information than eliminating Cook since most of the case comes down to "Random Nurse decided not to participate in this game." The meta argument is mostly an extension of that. I'd rather flip Cook here since the odds of scum are at least as good as Klick, but it would also be more informative given the number of non-activity related stances taken there.In post 2998, Meuh wrote:Let's kill Klick? Please?In post 2997, Ircher wrote:Let's just kill Cook.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Yeah, that's a really sensible take from someone who posted this just a few days ago:In post 3013, DkKoba wrote:ok LackReads whatever u sayIn post 3009, Aureal wrote:Your refusal to answer the question is noted.In post 3000, DkKoba wrote:Sorry , post contains 0 mafia solving and all excuses , disregarded.In post 2993, Aureal wrote: Maybe if Bingle would stop putting out bad takes, I wouldn't feel like my most important task is correcting them!
Who do you see actually "playing Mafia" at this point as opposed to just going "ugh let's kill someone!"?
Sort the damn game or die
"reads make enough sense"In post 2671, DkKoba wrote:went back and reread their progression and it looks good enough for now, they arent like much higher than my current PoEIn post 2669, Bingle wrote: Why do you think Aureal is just badtown now, DK? Cause I still see a complete lack of anything that would make that slot town.