@ Westbrook:
I meant "catch up" not as in reading the thread, but as in posting as much analysis and reasoning as the rest of us have. It is helpful for two reasons; it helps finding scum due to the analysis itself, and it presents more "data" for the rest of us to analyze later.
@ Xtoxm:
Xtoxm wrote:I've contributed plenty.
To test this claim, I took the liberty of tracking all your posts that were about scumhunting in this game (not about meta-game or general strategy). My words are in italics, added for context. Please let me know if there is something I've missed.
Post 88:
Xtoxm wrote:Asking someone else to create discussion strikes me as silly. I'm not sure if it's scummy.
I will Vote Militant.
I think that last post sounds kind of like he's forcing himself to say something.
Post 91:
Xtoxm wrote:Well, i'm not sure about the validity of your second point
(that militant may be new)
, but it is discounted anyway by the fact Militant has already played in several games, and is ranked goon.
Post 120:
Xtoxm wrote:Inf's recent posts strike me as odd, even coming from someone not used to the pace of games here.
Post 129:
Xtoxm wrote:Inf, what do you think Mafia is about, and why did you sign up for this game? - This is a genuine question
Post 160:
Xtoxm wrote:Bad philosphy.
(Elennaro unvoting RealityFan due to getting replace by militant)
. If a previous owner of a role has earnt a vote, getting replaced should not redeem the role.
Post 220:
Xtoxm wrote:Mmk skimmed through most stuff, not that long, was worried it would be!
On the cop with guilty - I was refering to this game only. Sometimes in larger games he might want to hold onto it.
We do not know, however if a cop has a guilty he certainly wants to get it out there right away. Then other peoples decide...
About Militant - Yes, I did find it a bit forced
(his response to CR's random vote)
, although it was for the most part just trying to start things off. I have been unimpressed with Inf since I brought him up, hence shall change.
Unvote Vote Inf
Post 238:
Xtoxm wrote:Oooh, I take that as a scumtell. Why did you not want to "jump straight in with a vote"?
(referring to _over saying he didn't want to vote CR before reading the entire thread)
Post 260:
Xtoxm wrote:I'm not sus of Ham.
Anyway, i've got my top 2 suspects, and i'm ready to lynch.
Post 263:
Xtoxm wrote:I believe I explained my reasons for finding them suspicous well.
(referring to militant/_over and infamous)
People often moan at me for not giving copius amounts of content in my posts. I don't feel there's anything more to say.
Post 270:
Xtoxm wrote:I have 2 suspects currently, Inf and Over. This implies I think the rest of town are town, and although I have an order of suspicion it is not beneficial to state it.
Post 273:
Xtoxm wrote:
Inf's recent posts strike me as odd, even coming from someone not used to the pace of games here.
About Militant - Yes, I did find it a bit forced, although it was for the most part just trying to start things off. I have been unimpressed with Inf since I brought him up, hence shall change.
Oooh, I take that as a scumtell.
Why did you not want to "jump straight in with a vote"?
Also, it seems I never mentioned, but there was one post from Inf, where he expresses that he is suprised at being voted for not contributing on Day One. It struck me as coming from a surprised scum, who thought he could lurk it
Post 314:
Xtoxm wrote:Yeh, waiting for a claim is a good idea.
All the logic behind your scumhunting can be summed in 30 words: "militant's reply seemed forced, but I'm not sure it's scummy" and "infamous' recent posts strike me as odd, his answers haven't impressed me, and he was surprised at getting voted."
As I said back in
post 262, you were the first to cast suspicion on the two people who are now closest to being lynched, and have provided a very small amount of reasoning to support either lynch. You've repeated more than once how certain you are of the two posters you suspect, and haven't analyzed anything that anyone else has said.
Looking back at just how little analysis you have provided makes me think you are scum trying to start bandwagons but not wanting to follow up on them so you don't seem too involved.
HoS Xtoxm