Well you're voting me so presumably you think my PR is also fake?In post 4296, Titus wrote:The only PR that can be fake is Ranger.
And how are you factoring "scum protecting Ranger" into RCE getting an inno on Ranger?
Well you're voting me so presumably you think my PR is also fake?In post 4296, Titus wrote:The only PR that can be fake is Ranger.
I forgot you claimed PR a second. Tired brain.In post 4300, GuiltyLion wrote:Well you're voting me so presumably you think my PR is also fake?In post 4296, Titus wrote:The only PR that can be fake is Ranger.
And how are you factoring "scum protecting Ranger" into RCE getting an inno on Ranger?
Uh let me think.In post 4298, Titus wrote:Where is the flaw in my logic?In post 4297, Enchant wrote: At this point i seriously considering leaving both alive and voting Titus out instead.
I sure do have an interest in which slot leaves.In post 4284, Titus wrote: she's overly invested in which slot leaves.
I just realized the greatest irony; Titus is likely scum acting to me as I acted towards her when I was scum.In post 4290, Titus wrote:No matter the route I take, Ranger is fake.
In post 4284, Titus wrote: I think it should be obvious Ranger is scum siding 3p. She's overly invested as being labeled town when 3p are often invest immune and she's overly invested in which slot leaves.
Hello Titus how can I help youIn post 4285, Titus wrote: I want to work with Ali and NorwegianboyEE.
Bro ur wrongIn post 4312, Alisae wrote: I'll guide through massclaim tomorrow plz we should kill GL
In post 4309, WhemeStar wrote: There’s a fly in my ear that keeps buzzing about KKFC being scum though
so this isn't on logic or anything right?In post 4310, WhemeStar wrote: Everytime I read their posts it’s so annoying
How? If I out it, scum just fakeclaim.In post 4287, KatyKimFanClub wrote:If you don't get a VT result on someone that is still useful later on in the game.In post 4274, furtiveglance wrote: The number of VTs matter because if there were around 50% of town being VTs, I'd be more likely to get a useful result.
Correct.In post 4288, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Also maybe I'm misreading the wording of your claim but if you investigated a town PR who alway studied (and thus never got TPR), you would get a VT result right?
Sure, but its possible for scum to claim VT.In post 4316, furtiveglance wrote:How? If I out it, scum just fakeclaim.In post 4287, KatyKimFanClub wrote:If you don't get a VT result on someone that is still useful later on in the game.In post 4274, furtiveglance wrote: The number of VTs matter because if there were around 50% of town being VTs, I'd be more likely to get a useful result.
EXACTLY.In post 4316, furtiveglance wrote:How? If I out it, scum just fakeclaim.In post 4287, KatyKimFanClub wrote:If you don't get a VT result on someone that is still useful later on in the game.In post 4274, furtiveglance wrote: The number of VTs matter because if there were around 50% of town being VTs, I'd be more likely to get a useful result.
Why would I use logicIn post 4315, Alisae wrote:In post 4309, WhemeStar wrote: There’s a fly in my ear that keeps buzzing about KKFC being scum thoughso this isn't on logic or anything right?In post 4310, WhemeStar wrote: Everytime I read their posts it’s so annoying