Furtiveglance near certain scum by VCs and yesterday. Ranger fake claimed post 1 and later on claiming a cop clear on the 3p. RCE has a "can't kill" result on Ranger.In post 4548, Cephrir wrote: hello
i'm strongly entertaining not reading any of this and would appreciate a summary
Uh, 8-3 and 7-4. Sorry, math is hard.In post 4519, KatyKimFanClub wrote: Ok so apparently it's 10-3 not 9-4 as I imagined, so scum can't win today even with the double elim? Unless we are somehow in double bonus night kill territory?
oh boyIn post 4510, Titus wrote: I knew Ranger was lying. I knew she was survivalistic. Now, we know she's not 3p.
So the question becomes: Is Ranger scum that couldn't expel because she was blocked when RCE investigated her or is she town pissed off that she was caught lying?
Her reads were still survivalistic as fuck but she can't be 3p like I thought. So I'd like input from Ali and NorwegianboyEE.
I'd also like furtiveglance to claim his result (if any).
JAJAJAJAJAJAIn post 4525, Ranger wrote: He also said if he did die to say hi to Norwee.
i don't care about VCs so can i get some clarification on what yesterday meansIn post 4550, Titus wrote:Furtiveglance near certain scum by VCs and yesterday. Ranger fake claimed post 1 and later on claiming a cop clear on the 3p. RCE has a "can't kill" result on Ranger.In post 4548, Cephrir wrote: hello
i'm strongly entertaining not reading any of this and would appreciate a summary
We've limmed a bunch of PRs.
Ranger admitted to faking a power role and faking a town result on Enchant (which was proven by the mod flip)....so we have pretty conclusive proof Ranger was lying.In post 4556, Alisae wrote: Well we have no way to actually prove if Ranger is lying right? We can't really know for sure what Enchant told Ranger.
idunno what to make of this LOL.
Should say voted.In post 4562, Titus wrote:Ranger admitted to faking a power role and faking a town result on Enchant (which was proven by the mod flip)....so we have pretty conclusive proof Ranger was lying.In post 4556, Alisae wrote: Well we have no way to actually prove if Ranger is lying right? We can't really know for sure what Enchant told Ranger.
idunno what to make of this LOL.
@Cephrir, Everyone scumread furtiveglance but the people who scumread furtiveglance were scummy.
your point?In post 4562, Titus wrote:Ranger admitted to faking a power role and faking a town result on Enchant (which was proven by the mod flip)....so we have pretty conclusive proof Ranger was lying.In post 4556, Alisae wrote: Well we have no way to actually prove if Ranger is lying right? We can't really know for sure what Enchant told Ranger.
idunno what to make of this LOL.
@Cephrir, Everyone scumread furtiveglance but the people who scumread furtiveglance were scummy.
Since Ranger was hardconfirmed to not be 3p i’m inclined to just sort them as town, but i’ll keep reading and see what i think.In post 4510, Titus wrote: I knew Ranger was lying. I knew she was survivalistic. Now, we know she's not 3p.
So the question becomes: Is Ranger scum that couldn't expel because she was blocked when RCE investigated her or is she town pissed off that she was caught lying?
Her reads were still survivalistic as fuck but she can't be 3p like I thought. So I'd like input from Ali and NorwegianboyEE.
I'd also like furtiveglance to claim his result (if any).
Not that i know of.In post 4527, KatyKimFanClub wrote:Is there an implication here?In post 4525, Ranger wrote: He also said if he did die to say hi to Norwee.
Btw you just claimed mason. Does that mean you have mason partner that can confirm your claim in theory? (Not that i’m asking u to claim who it is if true)In post 4553, KatyKimFanClub wrote: I got tricked by the earlier VC where it said 13 people alive >:(
