Micro Normal 1092 [Game Over]

[Aisa]

Votecount 1.02

Random Nurse (2):

bugspray, Nautical Dawn

Nuclear Gandhi (1):

KittyTacky

Flavor Leaf (1):

Skellen

bugspray (1):

Nuclear Gandhi

Not Voting (4):

Random Nurse, oasisshani, Flavor Leaf, TheHoldSteady

With 9 players alive, it takes 5 to eliminate.

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2023-10-05 20:00:00).

[Flavor Leaf]

But sense I was thinking about possible scum Bugspray, you moving from Bugs to focusing on me is a solid scum/scum move

Was this part of your original thinking?
To be frank, this feels like an added rationalization to a previous OMGUS reaction.

(not sure what it means in terms of AI to be completely honest)

It is the explanation for the read and it’s basis.

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

[Flavor Leaf]

i think thats a lot of people.

Way too early solve is One of Bugspray or Ghandi + one of the people in my Null.

Could be Ghandi trying to cut me down early for going on Bugspray, but i think that's too on the nose for it to be true.

Like this is a pure chainsaw explanation of you, if scum, trying to cut me down for targeting your partner.

I really dunno how you can act like it wasn’t there from the beginning, and it’s starting to feel like you’re trying to force a narrative

[Flavor Leaf]

I can see potential town doing that since it’s early game, people don’t have much to push so they gotta push something, but yeah, it’s looking real forced on your end.

I got confbias, I guess, but still

[Nuclear Gandhi]

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

It felt OMGUSy the first time I saw it.
So when you give an idea that's based on something that I pointed out afterwards, I naturally have question of whether or not it was there originally.

This kind of speculation and wondering about would be avoided if elaborated on thoughts/reads in the beginning.

[Nuclear Gandhi]

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

For clarity, we're still talking about the added part because that's what I asked you about, yes?

Could be Ghandi trying to cut me down early for going on Bugspray

you moving from Bugs to focusing on me is a solid scum/scum move

[Flavor Leaf]

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

It felt OMGUSy the first time I saw it.
So when you give an idea that's based on something that I pointed out afterwards, I naturally have question of whether or not it was there originally.

This kind of speculation and wondering about would be avoided if elaborated on thoughts/reads in the beginning.

I mean, what other reason would there be? Imo, it's clearly there.

I'll take the responsibility for assuming players would be able to connect dots when there's only like 3 dots on the paper, though

[Flavor Leaf]

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

For clarity, we're still talking about the added part because that's what I asked you about, yes?

Could be Ghandi trying to cut me down early for going on Bugspray

you moving from Bugs to focusing on me is a solid scum/scum move

the first one is pretty classic chainsaw defense.

The moving part doesn't matter to me, I had already said I don't really care about early votes.

But yeah, both posts are pushing it as chainsaw defense, and I had already stated that 'I think it's too on the nose to be true' which you keep conveniently cutting out.

If you're stuck on the semantics issue of the specifics of 'moving from Bugs', then sure, I'll give ya that one. I just dont really care about that part, as stated with the dont care about early votes line

[Flavor Leaf]

You coulda been on anyone, it was the moving towards me part over the bugspray, not the moving from (blank) part.

It just happened to also be bugspray

[Flavor Leaf]

You're also focusing on a reason that I actively threw out, and trying to force a narrative about it like it was some main reason I was pushing.

and at the end of the day, it's page 5. Even if you both ended up being town, that's a damn valid reason whether you like it or not

[Flavor Leaf]

i think thats a lot of people.

Way too early solve is One of Bugspray or Ghandi + one of the people in my Null.

Could be Ghandi trying to cut me down early for going on Bugspray,

but i think that's too on the nose for it to be true.

like you keep actively omitting this line, and trying to act like I'm pushing it as a reason that you two are both scum, when I'm actually making the exact opposite case saying I specifically don't think you two are aligned.

And if you two are aligned, damn, I'm good, lol. I wouldn't catch it right now right now, but the fact I had a feeling of it this early.

[Flavor Leaf]

aligned as scum*.

you could both be town, im not opposed to that idea. it's page 5. nobody's ruled out of anything on the grand scheme of things

[Flavor Leaf]

What basis is there if it wasn’t there before?

It felt OMGUSy the first time I saw it.

So when you give an idea that's based on something that I pointed out afterwards, I naturally have question of whether or not it was there originally.

This kind of speculation and wondering about would be avoided if elaborated on thoughts/reads in the beginning.

this is also you projecting. I SPECIFICALLY stated that I didn't think that was the case, so how is it OMGUS at all if I thought it was specifically not the case?

[Flavor Leaf]

But keep omitting that line, and misrepping it like I was hard pushing you or something, I'm sure that's gonna work out great for you.

[Nuclear Gandhi]

You coulda been on anyone, it was the moving towards me part over the bugspray, not the moving from (blank) part.

It just happened to also be bugspray

For clarification, I understand your point. Your point is your claim of me chainsaw defending bugspray.
My point, however, was to find out whether or not it's possible that you original thinking didn't have the additional

"NG moved from bugspray to me, typical scum/scum manouver, for chainsaw"

and you felt the need to claim that it was.

(you didn't have a need for it, but if you felt like you did and did lie that it was, that'd be a guilty verdict)

I'll take your not understanding what I was on about as a verdict for innocence, cheers

Even though this whole interaction was good in the sense that I feel better about your slot, I feel bad for my the failed communication

[Flavor Leaf]

as scum, if my original thinking didnt have the additional part, why would i say it

like, i would have the original thinking as scum too.

[Flavor Leaf]

I still feel like you felt me calling you out on the performative questioning + pocketing post hit something which triggered this response, but ill let thread develop, since it's too early for me to flood up the game.

[Nuclear Gandhi]

and at the end of the day, it's page 5. Even if you both ended up being town, that's a damn valid reason whether you like it or not

Putting validity of reasoning was never my intention, sorry if I made that impression.
I'm also sorry you probably still don't get it which part was I scrutinizing, that's my failure.

[Nuclear Gandhi]

as scum, if my original thinking didnt have the additional part, why would i say it

You're asking why would you ever add extra reasonings to your past ideas if you didn't have them originally
I just.. can't.

Not even talking about the "feeling the need to" that I was after.
You're asking how could thoughts and theories ever develop extra reasonings over time.
I mean.. ok. With magic honestly ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Flavor Leaf]

over time, sure, but it was like posts after and literally the same thing as in my post.

you werent asking for 'evolved reads' you were asking to explain the original one.

now you're really forcing a narrative.

[Flavor Leaf]

big ol misreppin.

question is to me now are you insecure town who got overdefensive or threatened scum when i called you out.

[Nuclear Gandhi]

over time, sure, but it was like posts after and literally the same thing as in my post.

The added part was "moved from bugs to me, typically scum/scum".
If you don't see it as an added reasoning to your original idea, that's fine, but I do as I made it perfectly clear. Why can't you look at my viewpoint for even sec, honestly?

[Nuclear Gandhi]

Like, I have to decide whether you're incapable of looking at things from other people's point of view and just judge them by your own logic, or you're pushing a narrative. It'd be avoided if you weren't so [retracted].

[Flavor Leaf]

But since I was thinking about possible scum Bugspray, you moving from Bugs to focusing on me is a solid scum/scum move,

you're talking about this line?!

You, as hypothetical scum, moving onto me after I brought up potential scumBugs IS a solid scum/scum move. It's a Chainsaw or Hatchet.

I didn't say it was a scum/scum move, it's a solid scum move. If you're town, it's not happening.

Keyword in there is

possible

scum Bugspray.

You're using a hypothetical situation, and me saying that would be a solid play 'as scum', while also saying earlier I do not believe that it is true, and trying to fit a narrative into it like I'm not seeing things from your POV?

[Flavor Leaf]

When I look into it from your POV, you're either town hard misreading things or scum trying to force a narrative (or scum misreading things, I guess is possible).

If you see it as an added reasoning, that's your misunderstanding.

If I look at it from your POV, the same words are there.