Wrong!In post 423, Afrayed Knott wrote: Comet no
Comet's vote on you is townvibe.
Try again.
In post 407, Afrayed Knott wrote:In post 398, Aneninen wrote: *"Am I representing you right if I interpret your..."
Sorry, I was paying attention to something else meanwhileTo answer you yes. To point one above, but I didn’t complete my thought process. I should have gone on to say that there is no one pushing those three atm and so I will wait to see where that goes. Therefore I remain focused on you.
Now in point 2 you say I am miss- quoting you. Well no. I read all you had to say and take up the other points you have included as examples of your play. But it was that one line that stuck.
Do you do that as a GM though?In post 421, Cometbright wrote: It's a lot of fun but also a lot of work. Also it's really expensive when you keep commissioning art of your characters.
AgreedIn post 422, Cometbright wrote: I feel this but subtract VIP with Kittie for me.
is it? or is it opportunistic? So no I dont think that's wrong at allIn post 425, DragonEater70 wrote:Wrong!In post 423, Afrayed Knott wrote: Comet no
Comet's vote on you is townvibe.
Try again.
No I feel that about you, at the posts I have listed above 251, 257 and 356. lots of content but its all pretty much IMO as I have stated - blah blahIn post 408, DragonEater70 wrote:Okay this post makes me completely rescind my townread on Knott.In post 395, Afrayed Knott wrote: The more I read the more the only clear choice for me is one of Kittie, Timmer or Comet. Where to place my vote becomes an issue for me and it seemed to be an issue for VIP for sometime also. I'm still in two minds on this. he does talk a good talk, like a few others here. in fact Comet Dragon and VIP seem to very good at long posts extolling how the game should be played or how scum or town does this or that. I have read them and find some of the posts very interesting. In Dragons posts I noted the following comment to myself "lots of content and some questions but I don't see them pushing anyone or being helpful". And then I still get a good vibe. VIP has been doing the same thing but he has changed in his content as the game has progressed, he seems to be under pressure, why? Not sure. But then is he trying to swing us in his towniness or is it all a bluff and part of his self proclaimed brilliance at faking town when scum. So based on that:
VOTE: VIP
What the actual duck.
Knott when did I do "lots of content and some questions but not pushing anyone or being helpful"? Or are you saying I said that about you? Because I didn't
Also I didn't get how your thought process went from kittie/Timmer/Comet to VIP.
Not wrong but also maths/statistics is the strongest tool I have at this point in the game so I'm willing to use it. That and the fact it felt like the VIP vote was added on at the end as like a 'okay I had this post already written out but I see now that the current leading wagon is VIP and VIP isn't me or my scum partner so I'm totally happy to try and push this wagon to end day 1 with a misexecute so I'm just going to tack on a VIP vote at the end of it'. It seems even more likely when you note the timestamps (#388-#393) cause it shows a lot of it has been written up before and then posted all at once so the idea of then tacking on something at the end of it seems to make sense to me?In post 424, DragonEater70 wrote: Also I disagree on the E-1 thing cause the scum could be inactive or afraid to vote, or just hiding in the shadows
I appreciate this but there's always going to be a bit of suspicion of 'was this actually intended to be there from the start or is this an addition written later after people have raised issues with it?'In post 426, Afrayed Knott wrote: In response to the confusion I have caused in people's minds, this is what is missing from my post prior to voting, I've bolded it for clarity
We swap campaigns weekly so that everyone gets a chance to play.In post 427, DragonEater70 wrote: Do you do that as a GM though?
Funnily enough this is the reason I'm voting you right now.In post 428, Afrayed Knott wrote: is it? or is it opportunistic? So no I dont think that's wrong at all
Yes that's a valid reason to scumread Knott, but it's not what you said.In post 432, Cometbright wrote: Not wrong but also maths/statistics is the strongest tool I have at this point in the game so I'm willing to use it. That and the fact it felt like the VIP vote was added on at the end as like a 'okay I had this post already written out but I see now that the current leading wagon is VIP and VIP isn't me or my scum partner so I'm totally happy to try and push this wagon to end day 1 with a misexecute so I'm just going to tack on a VIP vote at the end of it'. It seems even more likely when you note the timestamps (#388-#393) cause it shows a lot of it has been written up before and then posted all at once so the idea of then tacking on something at the end of it seems to make sense to me?
You think the fake hammer stuff fell under RVS?In post 430, DragonEater70 wrote: Okay I think this is literally the point this game got of RVS and things are getting spicy.
because of my stupidity at not finishing my train of thought and fully explaining why my vote went on VIP and not her or the other two. I feel she has picked up on that, well she has picked up on the comments made by others about it.In post 429, DragonEater70 wrote: Why do you think it's opportunistic?
Ooooh coolIn post 434, Cometbright wrote: We swap campaigns weekly so that everyone gets a chance to play.
Kinda? I didn't feel like anything real was going on, and definitely that "hammer" didn't come from scumreading VIP lol.In post 437, Cometbright wrote: You think the fake hammer stuff fell under RVS?
So you agree that you made a mistake/error but think I'm scummy for voting you because of it?In post 438, Afrayed Knott wrote: because of my stupidity at not finishing my train of thought and fully explaining why my vote went on VIP and not her or the other two. I feel she has picked up on that, well she has picked up on the comments made by others about it.
Yes I started reading and making notes long before I posted those posts, I looked through all the the posts during the weekend period and copied out the quotes to Word then added my thoughts to them , I then posted them into the thread. Why?In post 432, Cometbright wrote:Not wrong but also maths/statistics is the strongest tool I have at this point in the game so I'm willing to use it. That and the fact it felt like the VIP vote was added on at the end as like a 'okay I had this post already written out but I see now that the current leading wagon is VIP and VIP isn't me or my scum partner so I'm totally happy to try and push this wagon to end day 1 with a misexecute so I'm just going to tack on a VIP vote at the end of it'. It seems even more likely when you note the timestamps (#388-#393) cause it shows a lot of it has been written up before and then posted all at once so the idea of then tacking on something at the end of it seems to make sense to me?In post 424, DragonEater70 wrote: Also I disagree on the E-1 thing cause the scum could be inactive or afraid to vote, or just hiding in the shadows
I made a mistake in not finishing my train of thought, I think your vote was opportunistic yes, I found you scummy before your voteIn post 441, Cometbright wrote:So you agree that you made a mistake/error but think I'm scummy for voting you because of it?In post 438, Afrayed Knott wrote: because of my stupidity at not finishing my train of thought and fully explaining why my vote went on VIP and not her or the other two. I feel she has picked up on that, well she has picked up on the comments made by others about it.
So you think I was capitalising on a mistake you made by voting you over it? Would it have been more townie in your eyes for me to ignore/not mention the mistake?In post 444, Afrayed Knott wrote: I made a mistake in not finishing my train of thought, I think your vote was opportunistic yes, I found you scummy before your vote
there is no way I can prove or disprove this, but it is a genuine statement on my part. If you feel its not then why don' t we use your timestamp comparison------ all my pre prepared posts hit the thread at the 55 to 58 minute to the hour point in time. My vote post occurred at the 11 minute past the hour mark, so some 13 minutes...In post 433, Cometbright wrote:I appreciate this but there's always going to be a bit of suspicion of 'was this actually intended to be there from the start or is this an addition written later after people have raised issues with it?'In post 426, Afrayed Knott wrote: In response to the confusion I have caused in people's minds, this is what is missing from my post prior to voting, I've bolded it for clarity