Rereading Dragons' ISO yeah I'm fine sticking there for now. The reads on camel are always null-scum and the vote on camel in contradiction of his readslist was a bit suspect.
It's the challenging without denying aspect of it.
Seems like scum!you knows it's a scum post but you're surprised someone accurately read it as such. Compared with town!you knowing it's not a scum post and curious why someone would think it is.
this feels slimy like a made up reason
In post 348, imaginality wrote:
@Shirou my approach at the moment has been to skim and see what pings me one way or the other. Happy to let people float around null rather than efforting too hard with overanalysing stuff. So yeah I'm not trying to give a comprehensive readslist yet.
It's noteworthy to me that STD voted Camel in a pretty funky way in day 1, then ended up voting Imag in day 2 alongside Camel while still scumreading him
Pedit yeah that
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle
I wonder if camel actually might be scum with jjh trying to create anti-associatives??? Idk how to properly distinguish between anti-associatives and fake anti-associatives
I linked it. You expressed that a part of your vote on camel was becase there was a wagon on camel but not on imaginality.
I still would give anything to know what went on inside your brain in the 5 minutes between my quoted posts that turned you from "CCS - not feeling as good as i normally do about CCS but not entirely bad" to "i think i want this tbh after thinking about it" when the first 3 minutes were spent strengthening your scumread on imaginality. God only knows what the 2 minute interval was spent on.
So you can follow it up with a bunch of posts saying "Look at what I'm doing there's no way scum would do that" and also to attempt distancing in a game that requires it
"As best I can tell, jjh is some kind of wizard with mind control powers." -Jingle
In post 2762, T3 wrote:
I wonder if camel actually might be scum with jjh trying to create anti-associatives??? Idk how to properly distinguish between anti-associatives and fake anti-associatives
While this is plausible, the bigger issue is jjh's push on the slot. As scum he is 100% attuned to the fact I was a likely vote there along with Firebringer. jjh was really playing with fire (hue) by starting to shove camel.
In post 2765, Save The Dragons wrote:yes why would scum me do that instead of trying to create a wagon on imagineality?
To create distance with camel in the event he flipped. You've been playing the game for 19 years but you're asking questions like you've been playing for 2 months. Jesus Christ, dude.
In post 2763, Prism wrote:
I still would give anything to know what went on inside your brain in the 5 minutes between my quoted posts that turned you from "CCS - not feeling as good as i normally do about CCS but not entirely bad" to "i think i want this tbh after thinking about it" when the first 3 minutes were spent strengthening your scumread on imaginality. God only knows what the 2 minute interval was spent on.
i guess you've never given thought or reconsidered a read in your life huh
In post 2765, Save The Dragons wrote:yes why would scum me do that instead of trying to create a wagon on imagineality?
To create distance with camel in the event he flipped. You've been playing the game for 19 years but you're asking questions like you've been playing for 2 months. Jesus Christ, dude.
You're asking very obtuse questions and strawmanning. It is incredibly difficult to believe you are acting in good faith.
You can read. You know that my issue is not that you reconsidered camel. My issue is that you took 5 minutes, and 3 were spent strengthening a scumread on imaginality. The timing does not line up for the voteswitch.
