I’m not going to pay much attention to
3440 and I don’t think anyone else should either. What you’re doing gob is wholly unconvincing. camel was just looking to hammer a player that wasn’t a partner to end the day and escape. I’m also of the view that Scum wouldn’t have been so happy to sit on imaginality for as long as camel did when Titus was getting run up and the slip argument came out if imaginality is camel’s partner, but that’s my view.
Assume gob your way of breaking the game up made some sense (it doesn’t - it discounts context way too much, and can easily be gamed, but for the sake of argument, let’s pretend Scum don’t all push a single wagon through the vast majority of the time, so one stays off-wagon in most situations). In the case of Titus, you could plausibly make the argument that camel
was
off-wagon. Under normal circumstances, camel probably doesn’t hammer Titus there. camel can build Town cred by not doing so, their partners have already done a good chunk of the job, the Town is seemingly imploding, and the other alternative is a player camel clearly doesn’t care to see flipped (or benefits Scum in some way). Yet the mechanics of the game provided a massive incentive for camel to hammer Titus and end the day, since they were the ones intending to escape. That incentive probably overrides any sort of normal cluster rules you would apply as a mental shortcut. At the very least, I wouldn’t ignore this possibility.