You need to play better, thenIn post 371, Kittiesecret wrote: I dont need to defend my game play. tis just the way i play.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
You need to play better, thenIn post 371, Kittiesecret wrote: I dont need to defend my game play. tis just the way i play.
I mean yeah. I gave you the chance to explain your Arko read and you didn't want to cooperate. Now I'm just going to rally everyone to fade youIn post 376, Enchant wrote: Fun fact: If i start talking back you will say i am flailing.
Cringe game
In post 214, Hu Tao wrote: Post Post #214 (ISO) » Thu Nov 23, 2023 10:08 pm
Thoughts on naerys, everyone?
This feels genuine. but I cant tell if its coming from a damn I'm not flying under the radar anymore or a hey in town don't pick on me place.
I could get on board with this.In post 260, Black wrote: I'm wary of Klick
I think i started to put this in my post and took it out cuz it was getting to long but i get the same tingles here.In post 261, Black wrote: No strong case here. I thought ORAM was a little scummy and felt like she could have been frozen from being suspected by a couple of people on page 4
Klick hasn't really done anything I would consider town indicative since he replaced in. It feels like he's more willing to coast than try to solve the game
well there goes that...
I mentioned in my last post about not defending my game play. but here it is, I get an hour or 2 a day if I'm lucky to come in and have a really good read and put together a post. True, I am not always available to live interaction, in fact I believe my time zone is out of sync with a lot of the players here as well. so that really is a moot point please stop trying to push that as scum indicative.In post 273, Gamma Emerald wrote: Hmmm
I’ll acknowledge that but I feel like the walling over active participation issue is relevant so I would like to at least remediate that
In post 379, Kittiesecret wrote: I could get on board with this.
Don't let the replacement sway you from fading scum here. If anything, Enchant replacing in should be even more incentive to vote thereIn post 379, Kittiesecret wrote: well there goes that...
In post 333, Black wrote: You should both consider that you may be voting for limbait and join me on the Enchant wagon. I don't think I would be opposed going Testa or Thomith but I think their activity level and the solving nature of their posts could be useful even if they're scum here. As of right now those are the only 3 players I'd be willing to fade
Enchant likes to troll at D1, so its hard to read them.In post 319, Testarossa wrote:My problem is I have trouble with thinking your tunnel on Black feels like Arko's tunnel on her for example. Your play comes off as more static here, kind of like scum that doesn't know how to find a better target and how to engage with it. While I am no fan of the beetlejuicing argument, it's difficult to ignore how you were more present the very moment the wagon on you was formed. Can you explain why you think Black comes across as more opportunistic and with no intention of scumhunting here?In post 245, Naerys wrote: I am trying to figure out people. My D1 is usually bit weaker, but it gets better.
I am still on Black. I dont like her positioning upon me. She calls it "putting a pressure on me" but to me it feels like pure opportunism.
Also what's your take on Arko, Enchant slot and Thom?
Are you just going to ignore 249 foreverIn post 387, Naerys wrote:Enchant likes to troll at D1, so its hard to read them.In post 319, Testarossa wrote:My problem is I have trouble with thinking your tunnel on Black feels like Arko's tunnel on her for example. Your play comes off as more static here, kind of like scum that doesn't know how to find a better target and how to engage with it. While I am no fan of the beetlejuicing argument, it's difficult to ignore how you were more present the very moment the wagon on you was formed. Can you explain why you think Black comes across as more opportunistic and with no intention of scumhunting here?In post 245, Naerys wrote: I am trying to figure out people. My D1 is usually bit weaker, but it gets better.
I am still on Black. I dont like her positioning upon me. She calls it "putting a pressure on me" but to me it feels like pure opportunism.
Also what's your take on Arko, Enchant slot and Thom?
Arko is thoughtful, feels like town.
I dont like Thom´s jumping on Enchant so null tier for now.
Then why not explain your arko read?In post 378, Enchant wrote: I am tired of pretending i care who we kill d1
Why would you do this as IC? What if someone hammered quickly?In post 385, Enchant wrote: I would say that's too fast, but in fact i managed to get faster previous times.
Shame on you.
I reveal as Innocent Child.
DisagreeIn post 389, Enchant wrote: You can't scumhunt at d1 plox
It's like grabbing dice with your leg, strongly beliving that it raises your chances for favorable result.
I also found mafia D1 once or twice by votign randomly, does it make me good playerIn post 396, Black wrote: Yeah you can scum hunt D1. I've found scum on D1 before.
WhoIn post 394, Hu Tao wrote:Why would you do this as IC? What if someone hammered quickly?In post 385, Enchant wrote: I would say that's too fast, but in fact i managed to get faster previous times.
Shame on you.
I reveal as Innocent Child.