Open 104 - The New C9 - Game Over

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So I'm here now. Anyone care to tell me who the scum are?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Yeah... uh... I don't really get the claiming mason and the other guy losing it.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Ugh... fake cop claims just make it harder for the town to diagnose real cop claims and easier for the mafia to gauge who is cop before they claim.

I'm pretty much down to either omg or matrix, omg because of the fakeclaim and matrix because of the vanilla claim.

Of course, if we were going to policy lynch all of those claiming shit right now, the game would be over, scum win.

Be that as it may,

vote: matrix

[The Central Scrutinizer]

all, playing shorthanded while we wait for subs is uber retarted
for all we know, the people needing subs could all be wolves (unlikely they are ALL wolves, but you get the idea) and we are stroking each each other off
i need a sub
have fun

We've got like 20 people in this game and a handful of replacements (5?). At any given time in a large game, you're going to have five people lurking or not contributing much.

Stop making excuses and play mafia.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Fonz:

You are voting me because I "claimed vanilla" and because of my "appeal to emotion"

couple of things.

i) I refer to my role in every game I ever play anwhere as "vanilla" regardless of what my actual role is. Usually I am vanilla (just like everyone else is there are more Townies than any other role in any game) but I don't see why this is anti-town. I've not actually claimed anything.

ii) omg claimed a Town role in clear and unambiguous language, made odd appeals here and there yet you still prefer to lynch me over omg?


Players a and b have both exhibited behavior x - but I know a is nuts, so I'll vote b cos he must be scummy... Is that a fair summation?

I think we are more likely to find scum d1 barring any major slipups from players who are both active in the thread, and "following the herd" and voting for whomever the present fad seems to be for, without sticking their necks out and/or providing any useful reasons for why their vote hapens to be where it is. jmo.

vote: The Central Scrutinizer

oh my god i suck?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Right now I am very confident Hewitt is Town

fairly confident: Atak is Town and Scott is Town.

I am getting scummy vibes from m1ke and CS, more so than I was earlier with CS's rapid one line response to my vote.

Everyone else is in the meh column.

Your scumhunting is breathtaking.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Aww... I think the wittle wobot huwt their feewings...

[The Central Scrutinizer]

you call this game serious? i just checked out another ww site. they play days that are 1 year long. nights are 1 month. they say anything less than 10 month days is hurting the village.

This sounds more like some sort of Buddhist koan than an actual recounting of things that happened.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

This sounds more like some sort of Buddhist koan than an actual recounting of things that happened.

translation of TCS thus far this game:

lurk lurk - post some fluff - lurk lurk - vote for an easy wagon - lurk lurk - post more fluff.

Still very happy with my vote.


Scott:

I think I understand your POV here, but for the good of everyone playing, can you stop with the frequent oh so not very subtle digs at MS please.

thanks.

I was V/LA with limited access until... two days ago. This game was a 20-page explosion of uselessness in like the first three days, and I posted ASAP... hardly lurking.

I voted because I liked the Fonz's contribution... you know, that he actually contributed anything at all to this game. And your response doesn't make me any less likely to vote you.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I like a Wall-E lynch less than a Hitch or Scrutinizer lynch now.

I'm moving him to "neutral" read.Some of his posts seem bad, but he's interacting and says he's high volume poster, so I'll give him a pass for now.

If you tell me what I'm doing substantially different from more than half of the people in this game, I might actually vote for myself at this point.

Otherwise, make a case or shut up. Constantly alluding that a particular person is scummy and might deserve a wagon, but failing to provide any good reasons for doing so, just sounds like scum setting up a crappy vote.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

What are your reads then and why do you only show up when someone mentions you?

Because I'm waiting for a bunch of you fuckers to die so that we can get on with the real game. How am I supposed to scumhunt with 29 pages of fluff?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm sorry, I just woke up and I'm grumpy... I'll reread this idiocy later and try to do something. I just posted the snippiest comment I could.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

What are your reads then and why do you only show up when someone mentions you?

Because I'm waiting for a bunch of you fuckers to die so that we can get on with the real game. How am I supposed to scumhunt with 29 pages of fluff?

This post was my main issue with TCS. It seems so over the top with indignation or anger for a game that it seemed fake to me.

whatever

chill out

My indignation is constant and always over the top... it's a serious personality flaw.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

But I may just have a career in stand-up comedy.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

The fact that OMG is a vanilla townie gives us information.

Who was on his wagon?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Sorry for the continued lack of content... for a while there I was considering replacing out... but I'd rather not slow the game down any more than it has been. I know how a game can get murdered by multiple replacements.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm still trying to come up with a case of my own instead of just following The Fonz.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

No, Fonz, I've thought about it a bit, and I think there's something to be learned from all of this.

If I were the Cop, then zhaorx would be town.

Also, if I were the Doctor, I would have protected The Fonz last night.

But really, I'm the Vig, and I neglected to kill night 0. Tonight I might shoot Hitch.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Cause he's the man, as you can clearly see.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

With a plan for you and me

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Surely you can tell by the way that he uses his walk he's a woman's man, no time to talk.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Not liking the premature claim, TCS.

No... you don't understand at all. If I were scum, I might

bus:Wall-E

But since I'm a mason with zhaorx, I'm going to

vote:Wall-E

instead.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

this game is making my head hurt.

Now I am sure there is some obvious code in TCS' recent posts that I am too dumb to spot.

I am also not liking how quiet the thread has got recently - we have a week to deadline and I'm still not comfortable with a Wall-E lynch for reasons I outlined earlier.

TCS:

Why would a Goon want to bus Wall-E at this point? Simply because he is the leading wagon and there seem to be no other viable alternates? Setting up a n other wagon would arouse more suspicion than jumping onto Wall-E's I spose.

I do hope things start getting a little clearer d2 and the post count jumps up from where it has sunk to now. Some happy medium between the first flurry of posts and recent Dead Air has to be good.

Do MS's use some kind of variant of DADV? (Dead Air Dead Villager) - whenever the thread goes oh so quiet and very little is posted nearing the end of a day it's highly likely that the lead wagon is a villager. I suppose it would be DADT here if at all.

If such a thing is in use, I've never heard of it at all.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'd answer all of matrix's questions instead of picking and choosing, The Central Scrutinizer.

Then I suppose if he asks you any, you'll be very comprehensive and thorough.

If I were the cop, I might investigate strangercoug tonight.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I probably should have made my post clearer, but the only question I meant to direct at TCS specifically was:

Why would a Goon want to bus Wall-E at this point?

tho while I'm here he also missed:

TCS why would you have chosen Fonz for protection n0 had you been able to?

from an earlier post...

So we have TCS claiming two roles, this after many and various posts from Fonz outlining how on MS should a player claim 2 seperate roles in the same game its a reliable scumtell. Both Wall-E and TCS avoiding questions.

Then there is Siesta and Stranger who are both pressuring TCS for an answer - but not so much pressure for Wall-E. They are both voting Wall-E, but don't feel the same need to press Wall-E for answers it seems...

curiouser and curiouser.

If I were a vanilla townie, I would remark that this is quite pertinent and useful analysis.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Then there is Siesta and Stranger who are both pressuring TCS for an answer - but not so much pressure for Wall-E. They are both voting Wall-E, but don't feel the same need to press Wall-E for answers it seems...

I havent seen any questions wall-e has missed recently. He was giving me the scum-vibe when he showed up, and he hasent been able to defend himself at all, while this shouldnt have been a problem since he only had to defend one post.

but I guess the wall-e wagon isnt that well based, and the vote was more of a pressure vote to begin with, so i guess its only fair to unvote him, since hes not responding to the pressure anymore.

unvote

Fos:Wall-e

If I had a pulse, then I would find this post a hop-off.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Then there is Siesta and Stranger who are both pressuring TCS for an answer - but not so much pressure for Wall-E. They are both voting Wall-E, but don't feel the same need to press Wall-E for answers it seems...

I havent seen any questions wall-e has missed recently. He was giving me the scum-vibe when he showed up, and he hasent been able to defend himself at all, while this shouldnt have been a problem since he only had to defend one post.

but I guess the wall-e wagon isnt that well based, and the vote was more of a pressure vote to begin with, so i guess its only fair to unvote him, since hes not responding to the pressure anymore.

unvote

Fos:Wall-e

If I had a pulse, then I would find this post a hop-off.

Well yes.. I do hop off the wagon.. I thought that was fairly obvious

Or is hop-off some ms term im unfamiliar with?

If I were experienced, then I might tell you that your unvote looked like scum trying to get off a partner-wagon.

Hey, this is fun... I might make this a post restriction in a game I mod.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Well, I'm dead probably.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

You'll get more from me today. Just not TODAY. Time to party.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

This game makes so little sense... ridiculous activity followed by mind-numbing boredom.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

If I were town-aligned, then I might have been engaging in a stupid game to try to get the scum NOT to shoot The Fonz. Or I was just being an asshole. You choose.

From now on I think we need to start a new policy... after this point, people who softclaim, or claim without being serious, get lynched. I think this is reasonable and should be the first precondition for scumhunting.

And now I have to get ready for work, but soon I will scumhunt. Hopefully.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

If I were town-aligned, then I might have been engaging in a stupid game to try to get the scum NOT to shoot The Fonz. Or I was just being an asshole. You choose.

Your wording here suggests that you are

NOT

town-aligned. Congratulations on your slip.

Vote: The Central Scrutinizer

vote: StrangerCoug

I've been using that syntactical structure (if I were X, I would do/have done/might do X) for 90% of my posts this game.

You claimed that you read my posts and even pretended to do a little pretty analysis thing. That you would treat something I have done all game as a slip-up indicates that this is clearly a lie on your part. That you chose me to cast suspicion on, when you

clearly haven't read a word I've posted

up to this point is an iron-clad scum tell.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

TCS isn't being very villagery today imo.

How is my posting thus far anti-town? In one post I moved forward with content more than I did all of last day.

Also, lurker-lynching is just awful play right now. If I weren't voting for the skimming scum StrangerCoug, I'd vote you.

I'll settle for

FoS: Hitch

.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

If I were town-aligned, then I might have been engaging in a stupid game to try to get the scum NOT to shoot The Fonz. Or I was just being an asshole. You choose.

Your wording here suggests that you are

NOT

town-aligned. Congratulations on your slip.

Vote: The Central Scrutinizer

vote: StrangerCoug

I've been using that syntactical structure (if I were X, I would do/have done/might do X) for 90% of my posts this game.

You claimed that you read my posts and even pretended to do a little pretty analysis thing. That you would treat something I have done all game as a slip-up indicates that this is clearly a lie on your part. That you chose me to cast suspicion on, when you

clearly haven't read a word I've posted

up to this point is an iron-clad scum tell.

Okay this was a little interesting because I looked back and The Central Scrutinizer did use the whole if I were town, if I were blank quite a few times so it really is kind of funny that Strangercougar would say that. I don't necessarily see it as reason quite yet to vote for him but it certainly does throw him in a whole different light for me.

I also find it kind of amusing that The Central Scrutinizer is the one who claimed vigilante a while back and is now proposing that we lynch those who claim. As long as your playing by your own rules...

From this point on... clearly everything I did day one was me fucking around.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

also, TCS, what is your play for dealing with the players that aren't posting? I've stated mine.

I assume yours is just to let them get to endgame with no way of desciphering their roles. That's pretty anti-town behaviour if you ask me.

Prod, replacement. Then if we still have lurkers, maybe we can lynch them...

if

we have nothing better to do. And I think at this present time we have better things to do.

I honestly think that the mod slapping a 7-day deadline on a game with 1,000,000 lurkers is pretty irresponsible, and that prods/replacements should occur before he does such a thing, because this day is pretty inevitably going to end in no-lynch at this point.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

If I were town-aligned, then I might have been engaging in a stupid game to try to get the scum NOT to shoot The Fonz. Or I was just being an asshole. You choose.

Your wording here suggests that you are

NOT

town-aligned. Congratulations on your slip.

Vote: The Central Scrutinizer

vote: StrangerCoug

I've been using that syntactical structure (if I were X, I would do/have done/might do X) for 90% of my posts this game.

You claimed that you read my posts and even pretended to do a little pretty analysis thing. That you would treat something I have done all game as a slip-up indicates that this is clearly a lie on your part. That you chose me to cast suspicion on, when you

clearly haven't read a word I've posted

up to this point is an iron-clad scum tell.

Welcome to OMGUS land. I was not concerned about that structure because you said nothing to imply you weren't town when I made the analysis—in fact, I did a Ctrl+F on your posts to make sure. Now you have. It is your job to convince us that you are town.

NOT

to hint at otherwise. I have no problems with you saying "if I were a cop", "if I were a doc", "if I were a mason", or "if I were the vig", though I'll read it as you not being the roles in question. "If I were scum" is risking WIFOM and would probably be something I'd call you out for. "If I were town" implies that you are scum.

It's called the subjunctive mood, The Central Scrutinizer. Now, if you said "If I

AM

cop/doc/mason/vig", then it'd be a whole different story as they are not subjunctive and you therefore imply that those are valid possibilities. The same goes for "if I am town/scum", but you shouldn't need the former and should only be using the latter with a good reason to do so.

Do you understand why I'm jumping on you?

No. I'm sorry that your tell-concept failed though. Maybe next game?

I also find it kind of amusing that The Central Scrutinizer is the one who claimed vigilante a while back and is now proposing that we lynch those who claim.

This is noted.

...

None of you read, huh? Ever?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Also, OMGUS votes are

not

a reliable scumtell.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

No. I'm sorry that your tell-concept failed though. Maybe next game?

*facepalm* I hope you don't play like this in a game with Kairyuu in it. That's all I'm going to say anymore.

I also find it kind of amusing that The Central Scrutinizer is the one who claimed vigilante a while back and is now proposing that we lynch those who claim.

This is noted.

...

None of you read, huh? Ever?

Apparently, neither do you. You claimed vig on Day 1; I asked who you killed and why. I don't remember getting an answer. In addition, not only did you dismiss your own claim as you screwing around, but you said that anyone who claims, softclaims, etc. without being serious should be lynched from now on. Therefore, according to yourself, you should be lynched.

Yes... my point was that I was screwing around Day 1, mocking the play of some people on this thread. Now I am playing.

From this point on,

I said, as in "NOT PREVIOUSLY BUT FORWARD IN TIME," we should lynch those who softclaim jokingly.

Also, are you forgetting that a confirmed cop defended me very forcefully when he didn't have to?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

The more I read this thread, the more it confuses me.. And I dont see strong cases against anyone. I really dont have anything to add but well I dont like being modkilled..

FOS: SiestaGuru

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So close to epic lulz.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Mod, could you delay the deadline for the modkills a bit because of the sites crash? Otherwise we might be left with 5 guys

Oh and scrutinizer, whats up with that fos?

Being noncommittal is not pro-town behavior. Essentially you're not helping us hunt scum.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

MASS MURDER IMO

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I was promised mass modkilling and am feeling an epic lack of lulz in my mafiascum.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Yeah, I'm gonna have to reread post-carnage... at least sun and then branch out from who i can relate to sun. I think that's our ticket.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Don't ask me why I'm still here when I've lost interest in this game a long time ago.

Mod: I hereby request replacement.

Sigh.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

somebody just mentioned on 2p2 this game was still going on. I thought for sure it was abandoned. Sorry.
Walle, why are you unhappy with me?

also, fonz is probably a bad vote imo

?!

?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Lol... I like that my vote has probably a 38% chance of hitting scum right now.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Hell, I should say, 43%.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm willing to join you in lynching TCS.

I'm not willing to join the rest of the town in losing.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

The Case Against TCS By Wall-E:

He distanced Sun Tzu in his ISO 9.

He voted for my predecessor for an understandable mistake: His joke posts, (ISO 17 through 21, 23 through 30) were spread out over many pages. SC picked up on a COMMON and STRONG scumtell that, in the longer view, clearly was intended as a joke. However, I'd liken the entire sequence of events to scum setting a trap for a townie (which, if I'm right, makes TCS my hero in so many ways *).

In his ISO 33 he says everything he did D1 was him, "Just fucking around," a provably true statement, but I'd rather he not have said a damn thing than engage in a ten post indulgence - making fun of people who voted The Fonz for his, "If I'm the cop," plays.

Here's the thing, though. He claims the reason he made those prolific "If I'm the X, X is the X" posts was to protect The Fonz, yet he didn't pull the curtain aside until The Fonz was dead. He never even once spoke a word to his defence, merely continued to ape the post The Fonz came under fire for making without saying why. Most of us probably didn't catch on to what he was doing, but viewing his posts in isolation make it clear. * Hence the trap. Now, after the fact, he can say, "Well I tried to save The Fonz, and look how much he protected me!" Of course The Fonz was aware of the absurdity of TCS's actions. The Fonz's neck was on the line. He was reading everything anyone said to try to save himself. We've all been

there

.

In ISO 37 he clings to The Fonz's defence of him despite the odds of his being The Fonz's ONE investigation being VERY slim. More likely, The Fonz saw what TCS was doing with his joke posts and thought it was a strong town-tell (if only for the absurdity of the whole thing).

The rest of his posts have been fluffy non-hunting. He's been purporting since the beginning that he'd turn his act around and suddenly pop out with some newfound scumhunting effort after the fluff was over and the posting levels had gone down significantly. I say that time has come and passed. He was one of those who strongly advocated mass modkills, an action which statistically (if truly random) always helps the scum, and he has provided little to no useful content since his post 30 wherein he claims he was trying to save the cop but somehow was unable to just come out and say, "Guys, leave The Fonz alone. Your case is crap (it had to be, since he really WASN'T scum) and here's why."

I'm sorry for my behavior, but in general, I think this game has been a joke from start to finish and I've had great difficulty beginning to care.

Lurking and posting fluff for me at this present time is

not

a good case for lynching me. I've been lurking and posting fluff everywhere, because my work schedule has been getting jerked around like mad, and I've been mortgaging my mafia games for my life. In general, I'd rather be able to be here and contribute all the time, but right now I'd rather not replace out of a 50-page game that was essentially a scumchat game for 40 pages and has now turned into a lurkfest. So my general plan has been to lurk in my games, and contribute at such time that I can. I have slowly been picking up momentum in my other games, but this game is lagging behind because, frankly, I just can't give a shit about a game that was a joke and is now effectively an auto-scum win.

Also, I can't even believe that you'd think I, as scum, would openly support mass modkills. That's insulting. I'm pretty sure I've called for mass modkills before (though not gotten them, sadly), when I was town and everyone was lurking. Of course, you wouldn't know that. And I don't really care at any rate.

That's all I've got by way of explanation and defense. Next time I post in this thread I'll not use my time allotment posting a long-winded defense that you're not going to buy anyway, because

nobody

buys what I sell, because

nobody

understands how I play, except for the Fonz, and he's dead and now you're focusing on me for some stupid fucking reason that my rat brain can't even begin to comprehend.

<breath>

I'm about to Christian Bale all over this game. Peace.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

So.

At this point in the game, with scum doing as well as they are, I might expect one to be trying to lead a lynch, one to be actively distancing, and the rest lurking as much as possible.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

In process of rereading, but I have to go to work and I'd like to post at least something indicative of my thoughts before I do that. I think that our highest probability lynches would be Wall-E, matrix, or hitch.

More on why later, unless I change my mind, in which case I will tell you why.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

This is it for the moment. I'm doing PBPA's as the spirit moves me... just ticking through the highlights. Trying to get useful info.

PBP Read of

Sun Tzu

- the high points as viewed by TCS. His relationships with other players.

Post 0:

MickeyMike and atakdog are both wolves.

Of course, neither were scum, and so I think we can take this as evidence that Sun was operating at a pretty basic level of deception.

Post 6:

StrangerCoug wrote:
Vote: Sun Tzu for being the serial killer last time we played this setup.


Hey, that's not fair. I hardly got to play since I got night-killed on night 1.

Besides, I took out killa 7 night 0, so you should be grateful.

I'm a big proponent of the idea that there is a better than 50% chance that scum being voted or voting in the earliest stages of the game will be paired with a scumpartner. So scumpoints for SC/Wall-E v2.0.

Post 23:

I like this SiestaGuru already. I have no read yet, but I like him.

This is a low percentage play if SG is scum, and in my experience scum publicly buddies up to town, not to partners. Big town points for SG.

Post 34:

I'm not very good at reading matrix, but this looks like his villager game to me.

Based on post 0, scumpoints for matrix.

Post 44:

Hitch wrote:
Sun Tzu wrote:
vote omg_im_innocent_wtf


wat?

this is awful


Why is it awful?

Null, but I think it's relevant.

Post 58:

I agree about Hitch's post being a possible scum tell too.

So... if we're going with our assumption from 0, then townpoints for Hitch. However, this could begin to look like distancing when combined with the above "relevant" post.

Post 64:

I agree with atak that Hitch is wolfy. I also think we can clear him if Hitch comes up wolf because he wouldn't bus a wolf on day 1 like that.

vote Hitch

Yeah, this is beginning to look like bussing to me. I need to read Hitch in iso next.

Post 80:

Hitch you know I'm a tone player and you know I have your number.

I'm feeling a hint of inside knowledge?

Later Sun goes on to focus on three players--Hitch, Wall-E, and me. I think based on his "level" he's either pointing at 2/3 townies, or 3/3 townies. Hitch may be scum, and there may be distancing, but I'm not sure if he's the lynch for today.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

In process of rereading, but I have to go to work and I'd like to post at least something indicative of my thoughts before I do that. I think that our highest probability lynches would be Wall-E, matrix, or hitch.

More on why later, unless I change my mind, in which case I will tell you why.

Weird how you want to lynch someone active who's not you.

Scum can't all be lurking. Scum is deathly afraid of all doing the same thing.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

In process of rereading, but I have to go to work and I'd like to post at least something indicative of my thoughts before I do that. I think that our highest probability lynches would be Wall-E, matrix, or hitch.

More on why later, unless I change my mind, in which case I will tell you why.

Weird how you want to lynch someone active who's not you.

Scum can't all be lurking. Scum is deathly afraid of all doing the same thing.

Are they?

In my experience, yes. Which is all I have to go by.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I realize I'm not helping this already screwed up game, but I need to be replaced. My schedule is simply too cluttered to focus on multiple mafia games. I will attempt to make it up to you all in the future, but at this present time I am unable to continue.

I am sorry for any damage to the game I may have caused with my inconsistent participation.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Apparently I still haven't been replaced.

vote: Hitch

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Actually

unvote, vote: ScottHoward

. I think Hitch is another scum, but that the Scott wagon petered out to no-lynch yesterday with the support of a townie suggests that he is scum.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Seriously TCS? First of all what is with the vote for Hitch with no explanation? And then with 51 pages of game that's the only reason why you're voting for SH? Can you give a better explanation then that? If you can't I will most definitely be voting for you because it's a little bit ridiculous that we're about to lose and that's all you can say. I call scum.

Hewitt/Hitch/ScottHoward ftl?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

And yea, as mafia, I'm gonna successfully lurk for 51 pages, ask to be replaced, and then stick my neck out in lylo.

*DOINK*

Try again.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'm going to interpret your dumbfounded silence as the ultimate confirmation.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

lololololol

THE CAKE IS A LIE

[The Central Scrutinizer]

TOWNIES. WILL. VOTE. SCOTTHOWARD. NOW.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Mod:

Prods on all townies before we just hand this game to scum, please.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Why don't you feel like bussing ScottHoward, hewitt?

[The Central Scrutinizer]

First of all I wouldn't be bussing ScottHoward and second of all I think you're the most likely scum so that's why I'm voting for you.

I am baffled as to why... but that's beside the point. You should be bussing ScottHoward if you want us to think that you're a townie.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Obvscum is reason.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

[The Central Scrutinizer]

[The Central Scrutinizer]

But I'm not targeting you. At least not right now.

Join me in voting ScottHoward. It's not like anyone is going to come before the deadline anyhow.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

I'll just leave this here.



Townies lynch ANYONE and I post moar tits. Lynching > not lynching at all, which we are... 24 hours away from doing.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

unvote, vote: Matrix

Lynching anyone at all nao.

Scum not posting right now is valid strat. The two townies not posting now are fail.

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Alas, more evidence that I am to

always

be obeyed in endgame, regardless of what has come before it.