I spent several posts probing into Luka’s logic. I understood his logic and thought it was poor but not scummy, and that his progression on Sakura was good. So, I voted my next strongest scumread, Kawaii.
In post 359, T3 wrote:
I spent several posts probing into Luka’s logic. I understood his logic and thought it was poor but not scummy, and that his progression on Sakura was good. So, I voted my next strongest scumread, Kawaii.
I feel like this is a weak spot to end up after the barrage of posts before this
It feels weird, especially with all the time defending me inadvertently by defending Sakura in 166
I was not defending you inadvertently by defending Sakura. My evaluation of the logic of her defense of you in 49 is entirely separate from both my read of her and my current vote on you. You’re also assuming that I voted you because of Alisae’s reason for voting you, but I had a different, albeit weak reason for scumreading you.
In post 359, T3 wrote:
I spent several posts probing into Luka’s logic. I understood his logic and thought it was poor but not scummy, and that his progression on Sakura was good. So, I voted my next strongest scumread, Kawaii.
What do you find scummy in my play?
At the point I voted you it was because you were clearly present in the thread but had no real depth of analysis. 168 in particular struck me as odd. Really? That’s the only thing you have to say about any of the events in the game so far?
I feel like this is a weak spot to end up after the barrage of posts before this
It feels weird, especially with all the time defending me inadvertently by defending Sakura in 166
I was not defending you inadvertently by defending Sakura. My evaluation of the logic of her defense of you in 49 is entirely separate from both my read of her and my current vote on you. You’re also assuming that I voted you because of Alisae’s reason for voting you, but I had a different, albeit weak reason for scumreading you.
I realize the separation between defending Sakura's defensive logic of me and indirectly defending me. What is the weak reason for scumreading me?
pedit: Yeah it was, I wanted to know the thinking behind voting Gamma so I focused in asking why
I feel like this is a weak spot to end up after the barrage of posts before this
It feels weird, especially with all the time defending me inadvertently by defending Sakura in 166
I was not defending you inadvertently by defending Sakura. My evaluation of the logic of her defense of you in 49 is entirely separate from both my read of her and my current vote on you. You’re also assuming that I voted you because of Alisae’s reason for voting you, but I had a different, albeit weak reason for scumreading you.
I realize the separation between defending Sakura's defensive logic of me and indirectly defending me. What is the weak reason for scumreading me?
pedit: Yeah it was, I wanted to know the thinking behind voting Gamma so I focused in asking why
What conclusions did you arrive at from your questions about the wagon?
In post 368, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:
ok fine i dont have a clearable role, please interact with me, suspect me, idk. im desperate for a crumb of attention
It’s page 17 and you don’t have a solve of 4 players (only one of them is actually scum, 1 is LHF, and the other two are obvtown) that you’ll push for the rest of the game
In post 368, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:
ok fine i dont have a clearable role, please interact with me, suspect me, idk. im desperate for a crumb of attention
It’s page 17 and you don’t have a solve of 4 players (only one of them is actually scum, 1 is LHF, and the other two are obvtown) that you’ll push for the rest of the game
I’m disappointed in you Koba
i do have a solve, i just havent really said it explicitly yet
