VOTE: CakezIn post 1574, PenguinPower wrote:why didn't you go back to cakez?In post 1568, Sakura Hana wrote: UNVOTE:
But wait a minute, Dunn's last post was 1313 which was a while ago.
I dont think the Cakez wagon has rematerialized yet at this point has it?
by "2 votes from" do you mean he had 2 more votes on him?In post 1569, Sakura Hana wrote: Nope, according to the previous VC, Cakez was at 2 votes from gamma and BCG, and i voted Cakez for like less than a minute.
In the event that you're town and dunn is scum, then yes, you're basically giving Dunn free reign to nullify your case now.In post 1573, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: i probly should not have actually said anything and just waited to see what dunn would actually do whenever he finally shows up to the thread again
In the VC i checked, the only 2 votes on cakez were from you and BCG, soon after i voted him for like less than a minute and then switched to Ceph, skimmed a few posts after until Dunn's latest post i didnt see any more votes on Cakez which means the wagon on him hadn't re-emerged at that point.In post 1578, Gamma Emerald wrote:by "2 votes from" do you mean he had 2 more votes on him?In post 1569, Sakura Hana wrote: Nope, according to the previous VC, Cakez was at 2 votes from gamma and BCG, and i voted Cakez for like less than a minute.
well if he's mafia and cakez is town then I'm still right that he decided to not post in the thread to defend his townread but yea it is a mistake to say things before people do things.In post 1579, Sakura Hana wrote:In the event that you're town and dunn is scum, then yes, you're basically giving Dunn free reign to nullify your case now.In post 1573, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: i probly should not have actually said anything and just waited to see what dunn would actually do whenever he finally shows up to the thread again
I do want to give you the benefit of the doubt and think that you made an honest mistake in casing Dunn instead of trying to mislead people.
then the VC is wrong because I never voted CakezIn post 1581, Sakura Hana wrote:In the VC i checked, the only 2 votes on cakez were from you and BCG, soon after i voted him for like less than a minute and then switched to Ceph, skimmed a few posts after until Dunn's latest post i didnt see any more votes on Cakez which means the wagon on him hadn't re-emerged at that point.In post 1578, Gamma Emerald wrote:by "2 votes from" do you mean he had 2 more votes on him?In post 1569, Sakura Hana wrote: Nope, according to the previous VC, Cakez was at 2 votes from gamma and BCG, and i voted Cakez for like less than a minute.
you must be misreading this VC; I was on cephrir, not cakez
My mistake, it was Alisae and BCGIn post 1583, Gamma Emerald wrote:then the VC is wrong because I never voted CakezIn post 1581, Sakura Hana wrote:In the VC i checked, the only 2 votes on cakez were from you and BCG, soon after i voted him for like less than a minute and then switched to Ceph, skimmed a few posts after until Dunn's latest post i didnt see any more votes on Cakez which means the wagon on him hadn't re-emerged at that point.In post 1578, Gamma Emerald wrote:by "2 votes from" do you mean he had 2 more votes on him?In post 1569, Sakura Hana wrote: Nope, according to the previous VC, Cakez was at 2 votes from gamma and BCG, and i voted Cakez for like less than a minute.
WhyIn post 1570, Alisae wrote: Sakura is an IC this game btw
what makes you think you're going to get a functional answer to that question?
Would you rather I just not ask the question in the first place?In post 1590, Gamma Emerald wrote:what makes you think you're going to get a functional answer to that question?
Can I not be trying to sort Alisae?In post 1592, Gamma Emerald wrote: Unless you have a reason to disagree, yes
This is the laziest reason ever for townreading AlisaeIn post 1596, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: Alisae's got a lot of town energy feelz
