I would like to warn that we have much less time than the deadline would indicate; I expect coordination to be difficult if not unlikely over the holiday.
Appassionata:
Did you accept SC’s explanation of how BSW used WIFOM? To you, how does BSW compare to Natirasha or SC?
yorgi:
What do you think about Appassionata, independent of BSW? What are you currently thinking about SC? And anything to say about this?
afatchic [182] wrote:My thoughts on BSW is that if she is scum, 1 of the two people she is accusing of being scum is her scum buddy. Therefore if we followed her, she would bus one scum, somewhat clearing her, and then cause a mislynch later.
SC:
Why do you refer to BSW as “he”?
StrangerCoug [177] wrote:EmpTyger wrote:SC:
BSW said, essentially:
“Observation: If Apassionata is mafia, then I suspect yorgi is too for <reason>.
<reason> = Apassionata seems to be ignoring yorgi.”
1)
That’s not WIFOM.
It makes absolutely no claim about how mafia would not act.
You missed BlondeSoWut's saying "If I were Mafia, I'd do it too", which is where I'm getting the WIFOM.
That’s *still* not WIFOM.
It *still* makes absolutely no claim about how mafia would not act.
EmpTyger wrote:2) I asked you what’s insubstantial about <reason> and all you could say is that the observation is insubstantial. In fact, you don’t deny that <reason> is valid- you admit that to you it’s a valid scumtell!
To me, insubstantial = with little or no backing. There's not much else I see to it. Of course I admitted the tell (in this case, distancing) as valid. However, I don't see anything solid to back it up. Apassionata could be distancing from yorgi by ignoring her, or yorgi simply may not have said anything to catch Apassionata's attention. yorgi is, however, voting BlondeSoWut for roughly the same reason that I am.[/quote]
BSW made 2 observation:
1) She suspects Appassionata is mafia because <reason1>.
2) If Appassionata is mafia, then she suspects yorgi too, because <reason2>.
You argue that BSW is mafia because <reason2> is insubstantial in proving <statement1>. Which, compared to some of your more egregious illogical attacks this game, almost isn’t even worth attacking.
StrangerCoug [cont] wrote:EmpTyger wrote:And, for good measure, how is Natirasha not strictly worse than BSW using your logic?
Natirasha's just plain anti-town. BlondeSoWut is painting two people in a scummy light based on how he claims he would be playing as Mafia.
<snip>
And, once again, how is Natirasha not strictly worse than BSW using that logic?
BSW:
I have better things to do with my time than translate your gimmick. Over 3 people are not following you, so it’s not attributable to alignment. And I do not think this town can afford any more additional unhelpfulness to distract it. So drop it and play for real- or whatever consequence will be your responsibility. Right now, I believe from your play that you want the town to win, and so I suggest you take an amnesty of sort: henceforth drop the persona. Because as it should have become clear by now, regardless of how well your play might be, by handicapping your communication, you will harm the town. So if you persist in acting in a suboptimal way when you clearly have the option of performing better, then there’s really only one reason I can think of for that: deliberately wanting the town to fail. And if I have better things to do than translate for someone I think is protown, I certainly have better things to do than translate for someone I think isn’t. Like, vote them.