micro 1096: planned idea [game over]

[HighPrincessErinys]

Ok, initial thoughts are that the solve is in Black or HPE (one of the two, not both), TL1R and Shadow.

Ausuka is easy Town Lock and Koba's play seems too natural to me. It's been a while, and I'm rusty as hell with a bad streak thus far in the return, so take it all with a grain of salt, and I'll do another reread later today

About your initial thought, why did you think a solve is in Black or HPE? By Ausuka being a town lock, are you saying you normally find it easy to town lock Ausuka or are you town locking Ausuka in this game?

- A

I'm more saying that I think it could be one or the other, but not both, as one of my potential solves (not that it's definitely one of the two).

It was an initial impulse born honestly more from a gut read of their exchange pages 6 and 7:

VOTE: HPE

UNVOTE: Ausuka
RVS E-2... scawy!

Why so afraid?

cause a flip this early is a terrible idea lol

I'm curious why you didn't say this in 87

It feels more like you were riding the fence in that post when I would expect someone with this belief to be more critical of the shadow wagon

Not sure what non-criticality you're reading from "completely and utterly terrifying"

What are you terrified of exactly? Scum getting a quick misfade on someone?

That's a lesser concern compared to a painfully early shot in the dark funny ass flashwagon being basically devoid of info other than "well why did you guys flip them so early" to which everyone shrugs and says "shitpost". NO VCA, NO post-flip recontextualization of interactions, NO seeing who die hard townread the scum flip, nunna that. The longer a day goes, the better it is for town (in the long run atleast).

Do you think scum was pushing the shadow wagon?

Honestly? One scum on that wagon with the plausible deniability of RVS is likely, yes. Ausuka's too, perhaps.

HPE's posting here felt incredibly jumpy, and more concerned with not appearing to be pegged as a wagoner early on, as opposed to someone trying to engage in scum hunting. Black's responses, on the other hand, I can easily see as post hoc justification for the HPE vote which happened here: 127. I don't believe the exchange basically, but I also don't think that this is SvS, which means only one, if any, can be scum.

And like. This slot has to be cursed these are still terrible arguments against me. Jumpy?? Roden called me concerned about appearances too, when this one couldn't care less about them especially now that it has a laser lock on a scum slot.

[HighPrincessErinys]

My gut is saying Margot/Flare Fluff but this one is only really confident about Margot because there hasn't really been an improvement over Roden.

[Flare Fluff]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

[HighPrincessErinys]

My gut is saying Margot/Flare Fluff but this one is only really confident about Margot because there hasn't really been an improvement over Roden.

Also it occurred to me in the shower that ding ding ding this fits into my initial idea of 1 scum in 6 + a hydra as scumteam.

[Flare Fluff]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

And what is it?

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

And what is it?

- A

...A synergy?

[Flare Fluff]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

And what is it?

- A

...A synergy?

What is your synergy with Black? What are you agreeing on and why?

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

And what is it?

- A

...A synergy?

What is your synergy with Black? What are you agreeing on and why?

- A

Aren't you the one who just said this one is piggybacking off of Black? You tell me, friend.

[Flare Fluff]

I'm not liking how HPE is piggy backing off of Black.

- A

We have a synergy going, so what.

And what is it?

- A

...A synergy?

What is your synergy with Black? What are you agreeing on and why?

- A

Aren't you the one who just said this one is piggybacking off of Black? You tell me, friend.

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

[Flare Fluff]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

Do you have your own takes besides wagons? You have been agreeing with Black and talking about wagons. Talking about wagons is not helpful when there has been no scum flip. Elaborate on what is stinky about 323 and 344

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

Do you have your own takes besides wagons? You have been agreeing with Black and talking about wagons. Talking about wagons is not helpful when there has been no scum flip. Elaborate on what is stinky about 323 and 344

- A

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

[HighPrincessErinys]

There is yet to be a good argument made against me.

[Flare Fluff]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

Do you have your own takes besides wagons? You have been agreeing with Black and talking about wagons. Talking about wagons is not helpful when there has been no scum flip. Elaborate on what is stinky about 323 and 344

- A

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

I have read your argument with Roden and I was confused to the point where nothing on there looked like takes to me and it just looked like you were attacking each other. 349 doesn't look like a take and it looks like shading.

- A

[Flare Fluff]

There is yet to be a good argument made against me.

The problem with you is your town lock on Shadow still doesn't make sense to me. You town lock Shadow because the players voting him at rvs can't be scum with him and the players who didn't vote Shadow can't be scum with him because you town read 2 of the players who didn't vote him and the other 2 players who didn't vote Shadow you are not town reading which are the 2 hydras and you didn't explain on why Shadow can't be paired with the 2 hydras.

- A

[Flare Fluff]

It has gotten me wondering if you have been fabricating reads because of this.

- A

[HighPrincessErinys]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

Do you have your own takes besides wagons? You have been agreeing with Black and talking about wagons. Talking about wagons is not helpful when there has been no scum flip. Elaborate on what is stinky about 323 and 344

- A

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

I have read your argument with Roden and I was confused to the point where nothing on there looked like takes to me and it just looked like you were attacking each other. 349 doesn't look like a take and it looks like shading.

- A

If you really can't understand why exactly this one disliked Roden's posts then we don't really have anything to talk about regarding them.

[Flare Fluff]

includes ausuka rvs vote and also doesnt mention the fact that she includes pretty decent reasons for changing votes

ah yes feelings....



~H

[Flare Fluff]

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

if her eyes glaze over, then it seems your truly a boring person... sad

[Flare Fluff]

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

if her eyes glaze over, then it seems your truly a boring person... sad

~H

[HighPrincessErinys]

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

if her eyes glaze over, then it seems your truly a boring person... sad

If you feel the need to say this then this one'll interact just with a slot that operates in good faith instead.

[Flare Fluff]

There is yet to be a good argument made against me.

The only thing against you, is you come off to aggressive/defensive in your tone from what read.



~H

[Flare Fluff]

If you feel the need to say this then this one'll interact just with a slot that operates in good faith instead.

Good faith!? You of all people should not be preaching about good, after you insulted people, even made roden quit with your good faith attitude.. and calling my friend incapable of reading with the glaze over attitude response.

~H

[Flare Fluff]

I didn't like how you piggy backed Black into your suspicion on my slot and the suspicion on my slot was weak. You're not even trying to engage with me to figure out my alignment and I'm asking what other stuff are you agreeing with Black on beside on my slot.

Black or no, 323 and 344 are stinky posts. Also, 291 is an assessment it agrees with in a town!Roden world, and Black helped me get onto the path of actually trying to solve by asking 142. Black's like my buddy of sorts, for the moment.

Do you have your own takes besides wagons? You have been agreeing with Black and talking about wagons. Talking about wagons is not helpful when there has been no scum flip. Elaborate on what is stinky about 323 and 344

- A

Did your eyes just glaze over during me and Roden's argument over very non-wagon things? Did you just not see 349, which by the way don't forget the amounts of time between vote changes, and that we're still pretty damn early in the game and reads are typically fickle anyhow? This one doesn't care to do busywork for you.

I have read your argument with Roden and I was confused to the point where nothing on there looked like takes to me and it just looked like you were attacking each other. 349 doesn't look like a take and it looks like shading.

- A

If you really can't understand why exactly this one disliked Roden's posts then we don't really have anything to talk about regarding them.

You should care on why players don't understand stuff. What you're doing is you're not making it easy for players to get a read on you and you're not making it easy for players to find a town HPE if it is town. You will just be a slot where players don't mind on you getting eliminated.

- A