And why don’t you read me as town?
Why are you leading with “oh if he’s dead then I can still rely on him for commentary therefore he’s currently the best elimination”
Instead of a reason to scum read me?
In post 600, Bell wrote:
And why don’t you read me as town?
Why are you leading with “oh if he’s dead then I can still rely on him for commentary therefore he’s currently the best elimination”
Instead of a reason to scum read me?
I like Pooky's case. Not rocksolid and I asked you for evidence and got crickets.
On my personal reads level, yeah. On a gameplay level, Bell. What's the downside in limming Bell?
If i had to think of a downside it'd probably being unsure abt bell since from what i remember his posts could come from either alignment. I also checked back and i don't really get the slip comment on them.
Meanwhile Joyboy is a much more attractive vote in my eyes, same as Hu Tao maybe
Did you miss Bell can talk after death?
Titus, why would killing a towns person be better than leaving them alive.
I'm not sure if you're town and you can talk after death so we don't really suffer downsides.
Comrade, how could you say such a thing! If we assume that Bell is a noble comrade, the loss of his vote and loss of a potential 3rd, as-yet-unclaimed skill from Bell would be a loss of all of us in the union. While I myself am not wholly convinced of Bell's devotion to our socialist causes, this is a callous statement I would expect not from a forward-thinking comrade, but rather from the selfish bourgeoise and their jackbooted thugs.
On my personal reads level, yeah. On a gameplay level, Bell. What's the downside in limming Bell?
If i had to think of a downside it'd probably being unsure abt bell since from what i remember his posts could come from either alignment. I also checked back and i don't really get the slip comment on them.
Meanwhile Joyboy is a much more attractive vote in my eyes, same as Hu Tao maybe
Did you miss Bell can talk after death?
Titus, why would killing a towns person be better than leaving them alive.
I'm not sure if you're town and you can talk after death so we don't really suffer downsides.
Comrade, how could you say such a thing! If we assume that Bell is a noble comrade, the loss of his vote and loss of a potential 3rd, as-yet-unclaimed skill from Bell would be a loss of all of us in the union. While I myself am not wholly convinced of Bell's devotion to our socialist causes, this is a callous statement I would expect not from a forward-thinking comrade, but rather from the selfish bourgeoise and their jackbooted thugs.
Why would Bell have a third skill? Did scum get yhree skills?
On my personal reads level, yeah. On a gameplay level, Bell. What's the downside in limming Bell?
If i had to think of a downside it'd probably being unsure abt bell since from what i remember his posts could come from either alignment. I also checked back and i don't really get the slip comment on them.
Meanwhile Joyboy is a much more attractive vote in my eyes, same as Hu Tao maybe
Did you miss Bell can talk after death?
Titus, why would killing a towns person be better than leaving them alive.
I'm not sure if you're town and you can talk after death so we don't really suffer downsides.
Comrade, how could you say such a thing! If we assume that Bell is a noble comrade, the loss of his vote and loss of a potential 3rd, as-yet-unclaimed skill from Bell would be a loss of all of us in the union. While I myself am not wholly convinced of Bell's devotion to our socialist causes, this is a callous statement I would expect not from a forward-thinking comrade, but rather from the selfish bourgeoise and their jackbooted thugs.
Why would Bell have a third skill? Did scum get yhree skills?
The very formation of this union had all comrades blessed with
up to
three skills. I do not know how many skills he has, but there is the possibility of one more to be seen.
In post 605, lemon.tangerine wrote:
hey titus, as of now could you maybe look somewhere else that isnt bell?
I have. Joyboy and broccoli are acceptable.
Note comrades, that after I call out Titus's words as being anti-union, she now casts aspersions on my vegeacious self! There is no supporting evidence in her words. Engels himself described this very action in his work
In post 605, lemon.tangerine wrote:
hey titus, as of now could you maybe look somewhere else that isnt bell?
I have. Joyboy and broccoli are acceptable.
Note comrades, that after I call out Titus's words as being anti-union, she now casts aspersions on my vegeacious self! There is no supporting evidence in her words. Engels himself described this very action in his work
Behaviors of the Modern Capitalist
as an "OMGUS"
AS TITUS IS ON MY PIRATE CREW, I COULD TELL U THAT NOTHING IS WRONG!
I concur. It is a natural reaction when one doubts your revolutionary spirit to lash back with harsh words and accusations. But while nai, it should be still noted in the annals of history in case a pattern of desperate flailing occurs.
In post 310, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Anyway inregards to our setup (i read someone posted it about being alot of 1-shot abilities which ofc it is lol) Id say that alot of ppl probably have much more creative abilities than on other forums.
Just a rumour i heard that setups are often more creative on mafiascum, sooo im expecting ppl to be doing more than complain abt union leaders lol
Aka throw nukes everywhere ty <3
Also n1 actions are gonna be p chaotic i assume bc 14 ppl all using joat actions lol (yes 15-1 is 14 after wagon)
So like what happens if everyone just kills another player?
Our noble group is 17 players, not 15. Likewise, we are blessed with a suite of one shots, made abundantly clear in the pre-game literature. Yet, this post is casual, nay, skeptical, about the existence of our one shots. Observe the hedging: "I read someone posted it", "a rumor", "probably have much more creative abilities". Our JOAT abilities were clear from the moment we signed up for the union!
COMRADES! I ask of you, why would a hard-working member of the proletariat ignore their unique skills and abilities? They would not. JOAT abilities are our way of interacting with the world, our way of finding information, our way of aiding and protecting allies, our way of furthering the perpetual march of progress! To ignore our skills is anathema to everything we stand for!
Therefore, there can be only one conclusion. Lemon.tangerine is a perfidious union-buster, as sour as his name. He has ignored his innate skills to focus on another ability, one shared with all scum. Murder.
VOTE: lemon.tangerine
Actually doesn’t this suggest otherwise? Omitting 2 players assumes 3-men team and if my brain still works correctly 17p usually has 4-men team, no?
I would indeed expect a 13-4 split; the foul bourgeoise would have sent no less than that to try, futile though it may be, to shatter our noble spirits. No, Lemon's omission of two comrades is a minor error that I would expect from distraction; instead the smoking gun of their perfidy comes from the skepticism of abilities. Reread their first sentence and tell me that it is not hedging, that is not feigned nonchalance. While the braying of Bell's possible slip still rings in our ears, lemon's words offer a far more damning perspective.
Yup, you and joyboy teamed.
Now maybe Bell, maybe TMI. Still you two are likely scum.
Bell's probably the lim so why fight it?
Was this not Titus' initial reason for calling you mafia? While It's not exactly a thesis paper, I hardly think it's entirely a snap decision to call you mafia NOW with no history of reading you as such prior only after you expressed your own read, Laplacian.
In post 605, lemon.tangerine wrote:
hey titus, as of now could you maybe look somewhere else that isnt bell?
I have. Joyboy and broccoli are acceptable.
Note comrades, that after I call out Titus's words as being anti-union, she now casts aspersions on my vegeacious self! There is no supporting evidence in her words. Engels himself described this very action in his work