In post 672, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Such posts are more often than not made by towns than wolves so likeee i don't exactly support it + bell hasnt been too bad lately
Sure, but you are also more likely to be town than scum from a pure probabilistic standpoint as well. I think the ratio if you compare the probability of "perspective slipping" given you are town to the probability of "perspective slipping" given you are scum will be closer to 1:1.
Links: User Page | GTKAS
Do you have questions, ideas, or feedback for the Scummies? Please pm me!
In post 483, Firebringer wrote:
pooky is wrong just because i have a inclination to flirt with female scum doesn't mean I can't flirt with town people who are just scummy.
maria is innocent of the crimes u levy against her sir
fixed
its ok I won't push Maria because i know you enjoy losing to beautiful female scum princesses
In post 676, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Its one of those things you use for reaction baiting and get more reasons to vote said person based on bad response but never as a case argument
See that’s what I thought then he never let up and let it ride and then other players that have no business thinking that based on their level of experiencing nodding there heads and agreeing and then adding on their own horrible ideas for why it’s a good idea to kill me.
In post 672, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Such posts are more often than not made by towns than wolves so likeee i don't exactly support it + bell hasnt been too bad lately
Sure, but you are also more likely to be town than scum from a pure probabilistic standpoint as well. I think the ratio if you compare the probability of "perspective slipping" given you are town to the probability of "perspective slipping" given you are scum will be closer to 1:1.
Im not discussing about this. Is it possible bell could be scum? Sure, but not for this supposed perspective slip.
Well enough venting. Paper. Then weekend tommorrow and I can actually spend time trying to sort through the bullshit for something useful. Without also dealing with constant traffic from children with stuffy noses, nose bleeds and scrapes.
I really shouldn’t have engaged as much as I did today. No mistakes but…bleh.
In post 676, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Its one of those things you use for reaction baiting and get more reasons to vote said person based on bad response but never as a case argument
See that’s what I thought then he never let up and let it ride and then other players that have no business thinking that based on their level of experiencing nodding there heads and agreeing and then adding on their own horrible ideas for why it’s a good idea to kill me.
It’s enough to drive a dog to drink.
i'm assuming you're talking about ircher here.
do you think it's ai for him to act as such?
~rh
In post 676, lemon.tangerine wrote:
Its one of those things you use for reaction baiting and get more reasons to vote said person based on bad response but never as a case argument
See that’s what I thought then he never let up and let it ride and then other players that have no business thinking that based on their level of experiencing nodding there heads and agreeing and then adding on their own horrible ideas for why it’s a good idea to kill me.
It’s enough to drive a dog to drink.
i'm assuming you're talking about ircher here.
do you think it's ai for him to act as such?
~rh
Tldr: Yes and no, it was in reference to Titus, not Ircher.
Insert Ircher meta. I think he's goal oriented when he isn't getting himself killed by trolling and not knowing where people's tolerance lines are.
Tldr: Yes and no, it was in reference to Titus, not Ircher.
Insert Ircher meta. I think he's goal oriented when he isn't getting himself killed by trolling and not knowing where people's tolerance lines are.
Ate my post twice. smh.
In reference to this game, there's a point to what Ircher is doing and it's probably AI, I just don't know how to interpret what he's doing. What was funny to me is that unless I misread what he wrote, his recent response to why he thought I might be scum is that when you controlled for scum v town roll rates it would probably be 50/50 or, in other words, it would be completely random. It was a very weird way to try to justify why they leaned scum on it. Rather, the conclusion doesn't fit their own words.But maybe I misread what they were saying. Back to paper.
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
In post 483, Firebringer wrote:
pooky is wrong just because i have a inclination to flirt with female scum doesn't mean I can't flirt with town people who are just scummy.
maria is innocent of the crimes u levy against her sir
fixed
its ok I won't push Maria because i know you enjoy losing to beautiful female scum princesses
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."