i have at least 3 times gone back to page 1 to view your checklist and see which things have gotten crossed off so far and then remembered you can't do that
TO DO LIST for this game: real edition: serious edition: 2024 edition
make at least one post
make at least one post that is good
make at least one post between 5 and 5:15 AM
find a way to use an analogy from the "things to use as the tail end of an analogy" thread
have a good time with everyone
dont make anyone mad at me.... i bet youre mad at me already.... sorry.... just vote me.... whatever i dont even care anymore...
evoke VP Baltar less than 10 times (2024 challenge impossible)
make at least one post that is utterly groundbreakingly bad (2024 challenge extremely easy)
call my mom
refrain from talking about ongoing games with my mom
refrain from talking about ongoing games with VP Baltar
refrain from talking about VP Baltar in this ongoing game
learn something about myself
make a case against myself
make a case for myself
chainsaw someone really passionately
make exactly six readslists
refrain from breaking any site rules, no matter how much I WANT TO!!!! oooo i wanna break em so bad.... WHUH OH.... almost did it then.... just barely stopped myself
In post 600, tris wrote:
well, i don't have scumreads!!!! you've fallen for my trap
In post 601, tris wrote:
i dont even know what a scum read is! is that where i read the game as scum because i am scum?
In post 603, tris wrote:
im trying to find the mafia but im really bad at it
In post 606, tris wrote:
in coalition, the part where i stress about not having scum reads came after the coalition failed
There's an emotional dissonance here, this setup punishes not having scumreads
more
than Coalition so your lightheartedness about not having scumreads when you were apparently stressing about not having scumreads after the coalition failed is offputting
this is weird because in 595, you were saying i was too stressed about like not having scumreads. this new line of attack feels completely contrary to what you were saying before. i feels like you are trying to find seeming contradictions and slap a scumread on it.
in fact, i was stressed when like, i had hellbook's vote in tow, but for various reasons, i wasn't so much last night.
ive like been seeing you do a visible thought process and not having it be too constructed or neatly packaged youre kind of throwing stuff out there in like a really natural way and not being afraid to go like "idk about dannflor. no maybe dannflor is scum. vote: dannflor" which im not convinced is as hard or problematic to do as scum as maybe people think
i would say it is in the gathering information stages of read-forming
there's been a couple things that felt slightly more like scum things but i think they're pretty insubstantial and i think one of them could potentially also be interpreted as a town thing
In post 672, fireisredsir wrote:
there's been a couple places where you avoided/ignored a question someone had about one of your reads. is that on purpose?
