In post 1511, Political Clout wrote:that doesn't make sense gamestate wise. If scum I would go for the easy lim instead of doing all this god forsaken work.
Your slot was an elimination candidate before you replaced in. By default, that requires doing "this godforsaken" work.
A part of my scumread on you is the feeling you're doing the bare minimum to shake off the scumread on your slot, rather than genuinely trying to solve.
In post 1511, Political Clout wrote:also I would be more interested in your analysis of the vote count before we replaced in.
My thoughts are reflected in the readslists for the pages. If you have questions about them, you're free to ask.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
Got the feeling you and fire employ more "directly convince people" over "force people to compromise" and was hoping to use rhetorical techniques to make the point that we're specialized in the opposite hit harder
i think im more often not the directly convince people as scum type
i still don't really get it though, it seems like you are making the argument that this has relevance to your alignment in this game, but i don't follow why
Got the feeling you and fire employ more "directly convince people" over "force people to compromise" and was hoping to use rhetorical techniques to make the point that we're specialized in the opposite hit harder
i think im more often not the directly convince people as scum type
i still don't really get it though, it seems like you are making the argument that this has relevance to your alignment in this game, but i don't follow why
In post 1542, fireisredsir wrote:
i have been noticing more and more as a pattern lately that scum have a tendency to believe that town people's reads are more locked in than they actually are
it's a counterpoint to this
Plural | Nameless (They/He) and Alice (She/Her) and C (They/Them) and more
In post 1520, Dannflor wrote:if it helps
I think there's a recent pattern in my scum vs. town games where I tend to start my town games pretty reserved specifically because I think that's the best way to form better reads (basically by pretending im more of a spectator)
And in my scum games I tend to start out more proactive because that's the best way to get thread cred
of course now that I have mentioned that and made it clear I'm aware of that meta difference it is possible I just manipulated that just for this game but yknow whatever
I agree with this characterization, including how your awareness of it means you're skilled enough to manipulate it.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
In post 1490, Ranger wrote:I'll say you're probably never going to top town or top scum for the exact same reason; fear.
I don't believe fear has ever stopped you forming a confident read on me before. What is different about my play this game?
Perhaps fear was the wrong word to use. Healthy caution/paranoia would perhaps be better. If you had spent all of D1 hard-tunneling a slot and being wrong in your last game which ended in a loss, does it not affect your next game with them?
I don't want to not learn; I also don't want to overcompensate. So there's a hesitation to make judgements I otherwise would be inclined to make.
AKA, rBree2. Casual tryhard. I've Quite the RANGE. #pluralgang
"Interestingly though, town winrate in Blitzes has been really high."
Completely irrelevant since then scum can actively bus and still not get a scum lim through
its completely relevant because you were including scum not bussing as an assumption for your calculations of whether a lim on scum could go through ???
if fypov as town you are being wagoned by town and scum are offwagon bussing, then if town switches then scum lim can go through