Night Watch Open 95 - Game Over before 703

afatchic · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:53 pm

HAHAHA, we win!!!!

VOTE Camn

afatchic · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:54 pm

BTW scum can just claim and make this go quicker. i won't be hiding tonight, so there is no way scum can win.

camn · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:49 pm

Indeed.

Well played, fatchic.
You forced my hand on the Ortolan kill.
I figured you wouldn't actually hide behind him, but I couldn't afford the risk, and I really needed the double kill.

Here is our QT...
http://www.quicktopic.com/42/H/TK6GCW33xuVF
It is a little one-sided, but I like QT-review for game-enhancement purposes.

I was looking forward to battling Bionic, but sadly, the town could lynch us both at this point.

Congrads, town. I am sorry for my lies.

cameron

afatchic · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:07 pm

Camn well played. i had concerns day one about you, but was more worried about ortolan and bionic day 2.

afatchic · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:12 pm

Wow, whats funny is i almost hid behind SC that night for fun. lol. anyways, you claiming that you would take the lynch since you was VT, but that you would rather lynch an uncertain was nicely played, made me think more townie about you.

camn · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:18 pm

Thank you for your kind words!

I think I could have used some less-lurker scumbuddies....... but I still got off on the wrong foot on this game.
School has proven more work than I anticipated.

afatchic · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:20 pm

camn wrote:I think I could have used some less-lurker scumbuddies.

yeah that def. hurt you. i knew one of the major lurkers (xtoxm, crazy) was scum, and halfway through day 2 i was pretty sure it was crazy.

orangepenguin · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:24 pm

vote: camm

it's not over yet.

afatchic · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:27 pm

orangepenguin wrote:
vote: camm

it's not over yet.

now it is.

orangepenguin · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:35 pm

Well, good game.

Besides the terrible first day, I think we did a really good job. I feel kind of stupid for outing TCS like that. Not sure if the scum caught onto that before I pointed it out. I shouldn't have claimed yet though. afatchic pretty much won this for us. I did little to nothing, even though I didn't really have to.

I must say that this game was pretty enjoyable after I was called out and made into a big suspect.

afatchic · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:37 pm

Yeah i thought this was a really enjoyable game. Probably one of the most enjoyable i have had on MS. i would love to play with everyone here again.

camn · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:42 pm

orangepenguin wrote:I feel kind of stupid for outing TCS like that. Not sure if the scum caught onto that before I pointed it out.

I had my suspicions.. but you were definitely the confirmation...

orangepenguin · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:43 pm

Oh, and I think it's cool that I hammered and actually won in an endgame scenario for a change. Usually, the opposite happens, so it's a nice change.

ortolan · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 6:53 pm

good game guys

I was thinking what bionic wrote in 724 just before he posted it, afatchic was definitely MVP. With the hider WIFOM on last two days he transformed a fairly likely town win into a guaranteed town win, which was good.

I like the setup, perhaps it is a bit town-biased though. We lost one of our watchers night one and still pulled through. Perhaps the addition of a roleblocker to the scum side might help, although it might prove more of a liability as it would be detectable by the role-cop.

And OP, you realise role-copping me as you said you did in Post 722 didn't prove I wasn't scum. And just out of interest what did you think was scummy in my last post?

camn · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 7:02 pm

A quicklynch is almost always scummy, even with a guilty verdict.

Discussion = information = win.

Limiting discussion almost always hurts the town.
Unless the scum have a daykill or something weird like that!

Just a question, fatchic....

did you NOT hide these last 2 nights? or did you target someone?
I couldn't figure out which was more likely.
I think NOT hiding.

c

orangepenguin · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:07 pm

ortolan wrote: And OP, you realise role-copping me as you said you did in Post 722 didn't prove I wasn't scum. And just out of interest what did you think was scummy in my last post?

Oh, yeah, of course. My powers were pretty much useless with no power roles left, besides afatchic. If I investigated anyone besides afatchic, Jex would send me "townie".

orangepenguin · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:08 pm

..and so it wouldn't confirm anything other than you weren't a pro-town powerrole. (or sk)

bionicchop2 · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:12 pm

gg everybody. I played poorly IMO. I was right on Camn all game, but wrong on pretty much everything else.

ISO · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:35 pm

camn wrote:Thank you for your kind words!

I think I could have used some less-lurker scumbuddies....... but I still got off on the wrong foot on this game.
School has proven more work than I anticipated.

Man, I was doomed from the start. As soon as TCS was absolutely confident that either OP or I was scum, I knew I was fucked.

Sorry, team.

afatchic · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:48 pm

camn wrote:Just a question, fatchic....

did you NOT hide these last 2 nights? or did you target someone?
I couldn't figure out which was more likely.
I think NOT hiding.

c

No one. i almost hid for a laugh, but decided not to.

And yeah it does seem one sided now...

But if hider hits scum night 1, or double kill night one, or hider plus watcher die night one. pretty much if watcher didn't find scum night 1 it wouldn't have ended this way.

Great game everyone!

Kmd4390 · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:34 am

Camn, explain yourself on the Night 0 (or Night 1. whatever you want to call it) NK.

Oh, and no one visited Crazy that night.

camn · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:56 am

panda stomper picked you.... I dont know why!
I would have rather you lived, but considering how you rode me last game, I wasn't about to put up much of an argument!
Plus it was election day... and I had my party hat on.

I posted our QT.... not that it is very in depth!

Kmd4390 · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:36 am

Hmm. Panda didn't really say why he picked me in the QT. Oh well. It was a fun game to read. Thanks for modding Jex.

afatchic · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:36 am

Yeah it was a fun game, thanks for everyone playing and not bailing on the game, forcing us to get a bunch of replacements. Thanks for modding Jex!

ortolan · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:09 pm

For the record I don't think the scum played badly, HC's whole asking for a summary thing from me and bio was an interesting move- too bad he was already pretty much doomed to hang.

I was re-reading to find if I thought camn or bionic scummier for the end-game. camn actually seemed more townie when I re-read, the only thing I was suspicious of her for was flip-flopping around around on her vote near the end of day one (I think?). Bio played well for town I thought, especially without a power-role.