i dont know how to respond to black bc the only thing i can think of is like "well ofc she finds a bunch of stuff when PC says its between black and hellbooks" but i just dont see it that way
i didnt rly scrutinize fire at the start of the game bc i thought i would have a rly hard time sorting him. like that was gonna be the endgame problem for me
In post 2750, hellbooks wrote:
i dont know how to respond to black bc the only thing i can think of is like "well ofc she finds a bunch of stuff when PC says its between black and hellbooks" but i just dont see it that way
If you don't see it this way I find it weird for you to even post it. Feels like shade
In post 2752, tris wrote:
hellbooks specifically looked for interest in voting fire,
black later jumps on with a real possibility that was going to make the wagon viable
Yeah I saw that post too. To me it read more like hellbooks was trying to gauge where everyone stood with fire. That would make sense in a situation where they are trying to determine who to keep alive at the end
In post 2746, hellbooks wrote:
i thought tris reminding me of how i townread her before the flips was just not really a good response like of course i remember that its just that i reconsidered
well im asking you because i want to know why! like what changed in your thinking. none of your posts really aknowledged the town read you had had on me before.
In post 2749, Black wrote:
If I'm wrong, oh well. I didn't really have a good grasp on this game anyway. I'm happy I was right about fire and Ranger though
maybe its clear in the thread but, i dont recall right now. why did you vote pc?
In post 2750, hellbooks wrote:
i dont know how to respond to black bc the only thing i can think of is like "well ofc she finds a bunch of stuff when PC says its between black and hellbooks" but i just dont see it that way
i didnt rly scrutinize fire at the start of the game bc i thought i would have a rly hard time sorting him. like that was gonna be the endgame problem for me
I don't think they said anything compelling the quoted vote count said another way is that they were on the competing wagon of their scumbuddy and couldn't move since you're not voting anyone.
In post 2750, hellbooks wrote:
i dont know how to respond to black bc the only thing i can think of is like "well ofc she finds a bunch of stuff when PC says its between black and hellbooks" but i just dont see it that way
i didnt rly scrutinize fire at the start of the game bc i thought i would have a rly hard time sorting him. like that was gonna be the endgame problem for me
this is what i was assuming your process with fire was
In post 2761, tris wrote:
why did you move away from voting fire to voting for someone who might be fire's partner right as that player was floating the idea of voting fire
I wasn't really convinced fire was scum and I wasn't even thinking about possible partners for anyone. That was the first day I had come back to the game in a few days and I was several pages behind so my thoughts were really foggy. In hindsight it was a bad vote