There was a missing body of work and lack of proactivivity when they said they would check in with a player they suspected and then they consolidated into a scum read of ichirin after they ran off of with Dai’s argument. If I recall.
There was this townread that somehow shifted on a dime to a scumread Kagerou felt comfortable 1v1ing without any real established push from them prior. And that “miswording” feels bizarre on top of that.
In post 1729, Tenshi Hinanawi wrote:
There was this townread that somehow shifted on a dime to a scumread Kagerou felt comfortable 1v1ing without any real established push from them prior. And that “miswording” feels bizarre on top of that.
Ichirin made a towny post wow
*4 real life days happen*
ok maybe Ichirin isn't town let's fight
WOW SO SUDDEN AND UNPRECEDENT OF YOU KAGEROU, YOU MUST B A MMBR OF THE MAFIA
1. Not quite following. I’ll assume you mean to say that it’s convenient that they said they misspoke because that absolves them of having to defend their position.
2. Yes, I’d love to know how their reads have developed.
In post 1729, Tenshi Hinanawi wrote:
There was this townread that somehow shifted on a dime to a scumread Kagerou felt comfortable 1v1ing without any real established push from them prior. And that “miswording” feels bizarre on top of that.
Ichirin made a towny post wow
*4 real life days happen*
ok maybe Ichirin isn't town let's fight
WOW SO SUDDEN AND UNPRECEDENT OF YOU KAGEROU, YOU MUST B A MMBR OF THE MAFIA
God forbid you claim to keep me from flying under the radar again!
In post 1735, Yuuka Kazami wrote:
1. Not quite following. I’ll assume you mean to say that it’s convenient that they said they misspoke because that absolves them of having to defend their position.
2. Yes, I’d love to know how their reads have developed.
1) Kind of? Basically the “misspeak” pushes the same end goal as what was already a sketchy part of the ISO.
Kagerou had voiced that their read on Ichirin was open to change prior to the 1v1.
In post 678, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Clown raises some interesting points in a vaccum, i guess i should probably read Ichirin's ISO
Like I will give you that there was a decided lack of follow up, but [starting to agree with some of the things clown says] + [seeing new content they dont like] + [said new content is directed at them] is believable pivot point to me.
Especially when their first response to Ichirin's "giant fucking wall" was tempered (1301) until Ichirin doubled down with 1318 (which I also found scummy).
In post 1742, Clownpiece wrote:
Kagerou had voiced that their read on Ichirin was open to change prior to the 1v1.
In post 678, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Clown raises some interesting points in a vaccum, i guess i should probably read Ichirin's ISO
Like I will give you that there was a decided lack of follow up, but [starting to agree with some of the things clown says] + [seeing new content they dont like] + [said new content is directed at them] is believable pivot point to me.
Especially when their first response to Ichirin's "giant fucking wall" was tempered (1301) until Ichirin doubled down with 1318 (which I also found scummy).
Would you feel comfortable 1v1ing someone on day one off of someone else’s read?
In post 1683, Eternity Larva wrote:
Kagerou's tunnel is incredibly disingenuous here and i'm confused as to how others are not seeing it
The thing that is making me not feel like it is disingenuous is that almost every thing that Kagerou was pointing out was like exactly my reaction to Ichirin's posts.
Spoiler:
In post 1301, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
I kinda wanna vote Ichirin for this catchup but that would mean admitting clownpiece is probably town
In post 1344, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
i don't have a case prepared but i'll just say that the way you voted me is extremely indicative that you are extremely excited to be voting me / you are projecting this excitement to us, something that town would have no reason for in this gamestate
especially disingenuous considering me being wagoned is nothing new, i'm not OMGUSing random people voting me
In post 1349, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
at best she called me out for inefficiency, which yeah i'll admit i very much was
Again, you'll have to forgive me if I don't particularly trust you on this one. Daiyousei has been putting in the effort, you really haven't.
What do you mean you don't trust me, like this is not a question of trust this is a question of what was our conversation about
In post 1359, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Well, I feel like Ichirin would definetly be more honest about it if sie was actually town and excited about flipping scum!Kagerou
secondly, this scumread being on me at this exact moment just feel extremely convinient? Right as hir wagon threatens to get back on track
In post 1364, Kagerou Imaizumi wrote:
Yeah i think we get it now that's the third time you're saying this, and look, not saying this is impossible for this to come from town!you, just that this is exactly what scum!you needs to do, and your tone certainely isn't making me feel any different
Like, she was in the moment saying the exact things that I was thinking, so much so that I did not even really feel like I was needed to point the things out.
So to me, it felt like we were reading Ichirin's posts with the same set of eye -- so it makes it a little harder to swallow that it was an unfounded position for Kagerou to have.
And to the contrary, I found most of Ichirin's posts during their 1v1 to come across as forced/disingenuous.
In post 1695, Clownpiece wrote:
I have thoughts about eternity and kagerou's conversation, but it seems prudent to let kagerou answer questions before voicing them.