In post 517, ceejayvinoya wrote:implosion I don't really vibe with either. I feel like he's engaging for the sake of engaging and I thought sometimes he goes out a bit of his way to make his posts a bit more vague? Granted this could just also be how he posts but I've been feeling like parsing implosion's posts sort of feels a bit harder than parsing other players
is this scummy? am not sure but its what got my attention
I genuinely have no idea how you get "engaging for the sake of engaging" from my ISO. I spent the first day or two doing basically nothing because I wasn't really into the game yet and felt no need to engage. And then yesterday I basically posted a mad dash series of posts immediately before boarding a plane while i was able to. I've searched for specific things from specific people. How the heck are you getting "engaging for the sake of engaging" from my ISO?
If my posts are vague or hard to parse, it's either an issue of the way I write not coming through well to you or possibly just like, me being obtuse for a joke. I'm always happy to clarify or elaborate if there's anything specific.
Gut tells me the hedgy comment by ceejay here and the response by implo followed by the hedgy read from implo feels pretty partnered
I still don't think it makes any sense for me to hammer ceejay before letting him claim or get replaced but I can understand the thought that I would do it for the wifom
In post 682, implosion wrote:
PC is literally the only player in the game who was not explicitly fine with ceejay dying i think
I don't like this post. I think implo including himself in the group that was "explicitly fine" with the ceejay fade (even though he barely talked about ceejay at all) and then casting shade on PC for being an outlier feels agenda driven
As far as I'm concerned I think it should be between me klick and implosion. I don't think scum hammers their pr like that. I think black is clear. Dann being annoyed at the hammer I think that makes dann town.
In post 685, Klick wrote:
@Dann: have your thoughts on the worst changed at all?
I feel about the same
I think it's possible he's scum, I don't think he's had any particularly uber town moments and none of his interactions with CeeJay are clearing. However, while I do think his interactions with CeeJay aren't clearing, I lean towards reading them as a townie who wants CeeJay to be town rather than scum trying to distance. I think the line between those two is kinda thin though.
overall, still in the boat of leaning the worst town, although I wish I had some concrete reasons to slam dunk him as town
In post 517, ceejayvinoya wrote:
implosion I don't really vibe with either. I feel like he's engaging for the sake of engaging and I thought sometimes he goes out a bit of his way to make his posts a bit more vague? Granted this could just also be how he posts but I've been feeling like parsing implosion's posts sort of feels a bit harder than parsing other players
is this scummy? am not sure but its what got my attention
In post 717, Dannflor wrote:
black how do you reconcile klick being possible scum with the way he treated ceejay early in D1? you think the case on him was theatre?
Honestly I haven't even looked over things since the flip. I plan on doing that at some point and I'll get back to you on this
