so as a kill occurred, jailkeeper counts as a cop. and tracker is almost a cop. and cop is a cop. i propose we hypoclaim innos to protect our PRs. (we all say "If I'm a PR, I got an inno on ___"). if its mason/mason not much is lost, the only downside i can see is if someone hypos an inno on scum they can deduce that person is not tracker/jailkeeper/cop, but its only a minor loss, I feel? obviously if someone gets a guilty tonight or tomorrow night we still have enough breathing room to win so a guilty should claim. thoughts on hypoclaiming?
In post 1934, ketchup777 wrote:
so as a kill occurred, jailkeeper counts as a cop. and tracker is almost a cop. and cop is a cop. i propose we hypoclaim innos to protect our PRs. (we all say "If I'm a PR, I got an inno on ___"). if its mason/mason not much is lost, the only downside i can see is if someone hypos an inno on scum they can deduce that person is not tracker/jailkeeper/cop, but its only a minor loss, I feel? obviously if someone gets a guilty tonight or tomorrow night we still have enough breathing room to win so a guilty should claim. thoughts on hypoclaiming?
hard pass on the hypoclaiming. it gives scum information on who the vts/non-cops are if they see a vt claiming inno on the scum. this will eliminate some options. if they shot ydrasse, they might be desperate for info.
In post 1939, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
hard pass on the hypoclaiming. it gives scum information on who the vts/non-cops are if they see a vt claiming inno on the scum. this will eliminate some options. if they shot ydrasse, they might be desperate for info.
In post 1934, ketchup777 wrote:
so as a kill occurred, jailkeeper counts as a cop. and tracker is almost a cop. and cop is a cop. i propose we hypoclaim innos to protect our PRs. (we all say "If I'm a PR, I got an inno on ___"). if its mason/mason not much is lost, the only downside i can see is if someone hypos an inno on scum they can deduce that person is not tracker/jailkeeper/cop, but its only a minor loss, I feel? obviously if someone gets a guilty tonight or tomorrow night we still have enough breathing room to win so a guilty should claim. thoughts on hypoclaiming?
What’s hypoclaiming?
afaik we all say "if im a PR, i have an inno on __". then if we have an invetsigative PR that dies tonight we know their hypoclaim is also innocent
In post 1940, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 1926, Dannflor wrote:
Not Voting [1]: Purplemango
theories on purplemango's non-vote towards the end of the day?
I was thinking about this overnight and I'm still not sure. I'm trying to think about what makes sense for purple to do as scum in that situation and I think it would have seemed *more* suspicious to hammer Snivy after being so resistant for so long. But then why would he not hammer the one who was his preference to vote as of 1725? Maybe because Ydrasse said she would do it, but that reasoning doesn't sit right with me. So I'm getting very mixed vibes from the non-vote.
Sure purple is sus but he wasn’t actively working against the correct lim for a week.
HEM still comes across as town to me
So who is most likely to be paired with Snivy/Skitter?
I'm not sure, but Occam's razor says HEM's very strong defence of Snivy was town rather than scum pulling a "too scum to be scum but is actually scum" maneuver. Purple is suspect to me but I can't make out reason for the non-vote. I do feel like HEM cares about the health of the gamestate more than most though I don't want to relitigate the arguments from the end of yesterday.